Free access
Issue
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 43, Number 3, May-June 2009
Page(s) 507 - 522
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2009004
Published online 07 February 2009
  1. G. Aletti, G. Naldi and G. Toscani, First-order continuous models of opinion formation. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 67 (2007) 837–853 (electronic). [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  2. E. Ben-Naim, Opinion dynamics: rise and fall of political parties. Europhys. Lett. 69 (2005) 671–677. [CrossRef]
  3. G.A. Bird, Molecular gas dynamics and the direct simulation of gas flows, Oxford Engineering Science Series 42. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York (1995). Corrected reprint of the 1994 original, Oxford Science Publications.
  4. M. Campiti, G. Metafune and D. Pallara, Degenerate self-adjoint evolution equations on the unit interval. Semigroup Forum 57 (1998) 1–36. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  5. J.A. Carrillo, S. Cordier and G. Toscani, Over-populated tails for conservative in the mean, inelastic Maxwell models. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. A (to appear). Available at http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00206273/fr/.
  6. S. Cordier, L. Pareschi and G. Toscani, On a kinetic model for a simple market economy. J. Stat. Phys. 120 (2005) 253–277. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  7. G. Deffuant, D. Neau, F. Amblard and G. Weisbuch, Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Adv. Complex Systems 3 (2000) 87–98. [CrossRef]
  8. M.R. Feix, D. Lepelley, V. Merlin and J.-L. Rouet, The probability of conflicts in a U.S. presidential type election. Econom. Theory 23 (2004) 227–257. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  9. S. Galam, Rational group decision making: A random field Ising model at Formula . Phys. A 238 (1997) 66–80. [CrossRef]
  10. S. Galam, Contrarian deterministic effects on opinion dynamics: the hung elections scenario. Phys. A 333 (2004) 453–460. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  11. S. Galam, Heterogeneous beliefs, segregation, and extremism in the making of public opinions. Phys. Rev. E 71 (2005) 046123. [CrossRef]
  12. S. Galam and S. Moscovici, Towards a theory of collective phenomena: consensus and attitude changes in groups. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 21 (1991) 49–74. [CrossRef]
  13. S. Galam and J.-D. Zucker, From individual choice to group decision-making. Phys. A 287 (2000) 644–659. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  14. S. Galam, Y. Gefen and Y. Shapir, Sociophysics: A new approach of sociological collective behaviour. I. Mean-behaviour description of a strike. J. Math. Sociol. 9 (1982) 1–23. [CrossRef]
  15. R. Hegselmann and U. Krause, Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Sim. 5 (2002).
  16. F. Slanina, Inelastically scattering particles and wealth distribution in an open economy. Phys. Rev. E 69 (2004) 046102. [CrossRef]
  17. F. Slanina and H. Lavicka, Analytical results for the Sznajd model of opinion formation. Eur. Phys. J. B 35 (2003) 279–288. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  18. K. Sznajd-Weron and J. Sznajd, Opinion evolution in closed community. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 11 (2000) 1157–1166. [CrossRef]
  19. G. Toscani, Kinetic models of opinion formation. Commun. Math. Sci. 4 (2006) 481–496. [MathSciNet]

Recommended for you