Shape optimization and trial methods for free boundary problems
ESAIM: M2AN, 31 7 (1997) 805-825
Published online: 2017-01-31
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Numerical Solution to a Free Boundary Problem for the Stokes Equation Using the Coupled Complex Boundary Method in Shape Optimization Setting
Julius Fergy Tiongson Rabago and Hirofumi NotsuApplied Mathematics & Optimization 89 (1) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-023-10065-7
Multiplicity of solutions for a singular system with sign-changing potential
Wentao Lin and Yilan WeiForum Mathematicum (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1515/forum-2023-0345
A Shape-Newton Method for Free-Boundary Problems Subject to the Bernoulli Boundary Condition
Yiyun Fan, John Billingham and Kristoffer G. van der ZeeSIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 46 (6) A3599 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1137/23M1590263
Numerical solution to the exterior Bernoulli problem using the Dirichlet-Robin energy gap cost functional approach in two and three dimensions
Julius Fergy T. RabagoNumerical Algorithms 94 (1) 175 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11075-023-01497-x
A physics-informed learning approach to Bernoulli-type free boundary problems
Salvatore Cuomo, Fabio Giampaolo, Stefano Izzo, et al.Computers & Mathematics with Applications 128 34 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2022.10.003
On the new coupled complex boundary method in shape optimization framework for solving stationary free boundary problems
Julius Fergy T. RabagoMathematical Control and Related Fields (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3934/mcrf.2022041
A second-order shape optimization algorithm for solving the exterior Bernoulli free boundary problem using a new boundary cost functional
Julius Fergy T. Rabago and Hideyuki AzegamiComputational Optimization and Applications 77 (1) 251 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-020-00199-7
Solving a Bernoulli type free boundary problem with random diffusion
Rahel Brügger, Roberto Croce and Helmut HarbrechtESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations 26 56 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv/2019030
An improved shape optimization formulation of the Bernoulli problem by tracking the Neumann data
Julius Fergy T. Rabago and Hideyuki AzegamiJournal of Engineering Mathematics 117 (1) 1 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-019-10005-x
Shape optimization and subdivision surface based approach to solving 3D Bernoulli problems
Jan Zapletal and Jiří BouchalaComputers & Mathematics with Applications 78 (9) 2911 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2019.02.015
A cut finite element method for the Bernoulli free boundary value problem
Erik Burman, Daniel Elfverson, Peter Hansbo, Mats G. Larson and Karl LarssonComputer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 317 598 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2016.12.021
Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications - ENUMATH 2013
P. F. Antonietti, Nadia Bigoni and Marco VeraniLecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications - ENUMATH 2013 103 125 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10705-9_12
The Second-Order Shape Derivative of Kohn–Vogelius-Type Cost Functional Using the Boundary Differentiation Approach
Jerico Bacani and Gunther PeichlMathematics 2 (4) 196 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.3390/math2040196
Mimetic finite differences for nonlinear and control problems
P. F. Antonietti, L. Beirão da Veiga, N. Bigoni and M. VeraniMathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 24 (08) 1457 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202514400016
On Computation of the Shape Hessian of the Cost Functional Without Shape Sensitivity of the State Variable
H. Kasumba and K. KunischJournal of Optimization Theory and Applications 162 (3) 779 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-013-0520-4
Trends in PDE Constrained Optimization
Helmut Harbrecht and Johannes TauschInternational Series of Numerical Mathematics, Trends in PDE Constrained Optimization 165 213 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05083-6_14
Improved trial methods for a class of generalized Bernoulli problems
Helmut Harbrecht and Giannoula MitrouJournal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 420 (1) 177 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2014.05.059
On the First-Order Shape Derivative of the Kohn-Vogelius Cost Functional of the Bernoulli Problem
Jerico B. Bacani and Gunther PeichlAbstract and Applied Analysis 2013 1 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/384320
A Dirichlet–Neumann cost functional approach for the Bernoulli problem
A. Ben Abda, F. Bouchon, G. H. Peichl, M. Sayeh and R. TouzaniJournal of Engineering Mathematics 81 (1) 157 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-012-9608-3
Numerical approximation of one phase quadrature domains
Mahmoudreza Bazarganzadeh and Farid BozorgniaNumerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations 29 (5) 1709 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1002/num.21773
On a Kohn-Vogelius like formulation of free boundary problems
Karsten Eppler and Helmut HarbrechtComputational Optimization and Applications 52 (1) 69 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-010-9345-3
Constrained Optimization and Optimal Control for Partial Differential Equations
Karsten Eppler and Helmut HarbrechtInternational Series of Numerical Mathematics, Constrained Optimization and Optimal Control for Partial Differential Equations 160 277 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0133-1_15
Two Adjoint-Based Optimization Approaches for a Free Surface Stokes Flow
Sabine Repke, Nicole Marheineke and René PinnauSIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 71 (6) 2168 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1137/100797953
Tracking Neumann Data for Stationary Free Boundary Problems
Karsten Eppler and Helmut HarbrechtSIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 48 (5) 2901 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1137/080733760
Tracking Dirichlet Data in L 2 is an Ill-Posed Problem
K. Eppler and H. HarbrechtJournal of Optimization Theory and Applications 145 (1) 17 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-009-9630-4
An inverse model for a free-boundary problem with a contact line: Steady case
Oleg Volkov and Bartosz ProtasJournal of Computational Physics 228 (13) 4893 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.03.042
A Newton method for Bernoulli’s free boundary problem in three dimensions
Helmut HarbrechtComputing 82 (1) 11 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-008-0260-8
On Convergence in Elliptic Shape Optimization
Karsten Eppler, Helmut Harbrecht and Reinhold SchneiderSIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 46 (1) 61 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1137/05062679X
Efficient treatment of stationary free boundary problems
Karsten Eppler and Helmut HarbrechtApplied Numerical Mathematics 56 (10-11) 1326 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnum.2006.03.017
Control and Estimation of Distributed Parameter Systems
Kazufumi ItoControl and Estimation of Distributed Parameter Systems 203 (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8001-5_13
Shape Optimization and Fictitious Domain Approach for Solving Free Boundary Problems of Bernoulli Type
J. T. Haslinger, K. Kunisch and G. PeichlComputational Optimization and Applications 26 (3) 231 (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026095405906
Free surfaces: shape sensitivity analysis and numerical methods
Kari T. K�rkk�inen and Timo TiihonenInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 44 (8) 1079 (1999)
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990320)44:8<1079::AID-NME543>3.0.CO;2-I