Issue |
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 56, Number 1, January-February 2022
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 79 - 104 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2021070 | |
Published online | 07 February 2022 |
Convergence bounds for empirical nonlinear least-squares
1
Weierstrass Institute, Mohrenstrasse 39, D-10117 , Berlin, Germany
2
TU Berlin, Straße des 17 Juni 136, D-10623 , Berlin, Germany
* Corresponding author: ptrunschke@mail.tu-berlin.de
Received:
2
April
2020
Accepted:
20
October
2021
We consider best approximation problems in a nonlinear subset ℳ of a Banach space of functions (𝒱,∥•∥). The norm is assumed to be a generalization of the L 2-norm for which only a weighted Monte Carlo estimate ∥•∥n can be computed. The objective is to obtain an approximation v ∈ ℳ of an unknown function u ∈ 𝒱 by minimizing the empirical norm ∥u − v∥n. We consider this problem for general nonlinear subsets and establish error bounds for the empirical best approximation error. Our results are based on a restricted isometry property (RIP) which holds in probability and is independent of the specified nonlinear least squares setting. Several model classes are examined and the analytical statements about the RIP are compared to existing sample complexity bounds from the literature. We find that for well-studied model classes our general bound is weaker but exhibits many of the same properties as these specialized bounds. Notably, we demonstrate the advantage of an optimal sampling density (as known for linear spaces) for sets of functions with sparse representations.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 62J02 / 41A25 / 41A65 / 41A30
Key words: Weighted nonlinear least squares / error analysis / convergence rates / weighted sparsity / tensor networks
© The authors. Published by EDP Sciences, SMAI 2022
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.