Issue |
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 59, Number 1, January-February 2025
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 553 - 578 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2024084 | |
Published online | 16 January 2025 |
Error inhibiting methods for finite elements
1
School of Mathematical Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
2
Department of Geophysics, Porter school of Environment and Earth Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
3
Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
* Corresponding author: anneleb@tauex.tau.ac.il
Received:
12
May
2024
Accepted:
16
December
2024
Finite Difference methods (FD) are one of the oldest and simplest methods for solving partial differential equations (PDE). Block Finite Difference methods (BFD) are FD methods in which the domain is divided into blocks, or cells, containing two or more grid points, with a different scheme used for each grid point, unlike the standard FD method. It was shown in recent works that BFD schemes might be one to three orders more accurate than their truncation errors. Due to these schemes’ ability to inhibit the accumulation of truncation errors, these methods were called Error Inhibiting Schemes (EIS). This manuscript shows that our BFD schemes can be viewed as a particular type of Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) method. Then, we prove the BFD scheme’s stability using the standard DG procedure while using a Fourier-like analysis to establish its optimal convergence rate. We present numerical examples in one and two dimensions to demonstrate the efficacy of these schemes.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 65M06 / 65M12 / 65M60
Key words: Finite difference / block finite difference / finite elements / discontinuous Galerkin / heat equation
© The authors. Published by EDP Sciences, SMAI 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.