Free Access
Issue
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 27, Number 5, 1993
Page(s) 515 - 534
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/1993270505151
Published online 31 January 2017
  1. E. AARTS and J. KORST, 1989, Simulated Annealing and Boltzmann Machines, John Wiley and Sons. [MR: 983115] [Zbl: 0674.90059] [Google Scholar]
  2. A. J. BAYES, 1973, A dynamic programming algorithm to optimize decision table code, Australian Computer Journal, 5, 77-79. [Google Scholar]
  3. L. BREIMAN, J. FRIEDMAN, R. OLSHEN and C. STONE, 1984, Classification and Regression Trees, EDMAN, R. OLSH Wadsworth Int. [MR: 726392] [Zbl: 0541.62042] [Google Scholar]
  4. R. S. BUCY and R. S. DIESPOSTI, 1991, Classification Tree Optimization by Simulated Annealing The Aerospace Corp., P.O. Box 92957, Los Angeles,California, USA 90009-2957, ATR No 91 (8073)-l. [Google Scholar]
  5. A. CORANA, M. MARCHESI, C. MARTINI, S. RIDELLA, 1987, Minimizing multimodal functions of continuous variables with the simulated annealing algorithm, ACM Trans, on Mathematical Software, 13, 262-280. [MR: 918580] [Zbl: 0632.65075] [Google Scholar]
  6. G. DEWEY, 1950, Relative Frequency of English Speech Sounds, Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  7. A. EL GAMAL, L. HEMACHANDRA, I. SHPERLING and V. WEI, 1987, Using simulated annealing to design good codes, IEEE Trans. on Information Theory 33, 116-123. [Google Scholar]
  8. R. G. GALLAGER, 1968, Information Theory and Reliable Communication, John Wiley and Sons. [Zbl: 0198.52201] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. R. GAREY, 1970, Optimal Binary Decision Trees for Diagnostic Identification Problems, Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. of Wisconsin. [Google Scholar]
  10. M. R. GAREY and R. L. GRAHAM, 1974, Performance bounds on the splitting algorithm for binary testing, Acta Informatica, 3, 347-355. [Zbl: 0276.68023] [Google Scholar]
  11. C. R. P. HARTMANN, P. K. VARSHNEY, K. G. MEHROTRA and C. L. GERBERICH, 1982, Application of information theory to the construction of efficient decision trees, IEEE Trans, on Information Theory, 28, 565-577. [Zbl: 0483.68064] [Google Scholar]
  12. J. A. HERRERA-BALL, 1988, Theoretical Foundations and Algorithms for the Generation of Optimal Decision Trees, Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. of Tennessee. [Google Scholar]
  13. S. KIRKPATRICK, C. D. Jr. GELATT and M. P. VECCHI, 1983, Optimization by simulated annealing, Science, 220, 671-680. [Zbl: 1225.90162] [MR: 702485] [Google Scholar]
  14. N. METROPOLIS, A. ROSENBLUTH, M. ROSENBLUTH, A. TELLER and E. TELLER, 1953, Equation of state calculation by fast Computing machines, J. of Chem. Physics, 21, 1087-1092. [Google Scholar]
  15. B. MORET, 1982, Decision trees and diagrams, Computing Surveys 14, 593-623. [Google Scholar]
  16. O. MURPHY, 1990, A unifying framework for trie design heuristics, Information Processing Letters 34, 243-249. [MR: 1059987] [Zbl: 0696.68035] [Google Scholar]
  17. L. T. REINWALD, R. M. SOLAND, 1966, Conversion of limited entry décision tables to optimal computer programs I : minimum average processing time, J.Ass. Comput. Mach. 13, 339-358. [Zbl: 0173.19505] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you