Free Access
Volume 41, Number 2, March-April 2007
Special issue on Molecular Modelling
Page(s) 333 - 350
Published online 16 June 2007
  1. H.C. Andersen, Molecular dynamics simulations at constant pressure and/or temperature. J. Chem. Phys. 72 (1980) 2384–2393. [CrossRef]
  2. E.J. Barth, B.B. Laird and B.J. Leimkuhler, Generating generalized distributions from dynamical simulation. J. Chem. Phys. 118 (2003) 5759–5768. [CrossRef]
  3. E. Barth, B. Leimkuhler and C. Sweet, Approach to thermal equilibrium in biomolecular simulation, in New Algorithms for Macromolecular Simulation, B. Leimkuhler, C. Chipot, R. Elber, A. Laaksonen, A. Mark, T. Schlick, C. Schütte and R. Skeel Eds., Springer Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering 49 (2006).
  4. L. Boltzmann, On certain questions of the theory of gases. Nature 51 (1895) 413–415. [CrossRef]
  5. S.D. Bond, B.J. Leimkuhler and B.B. Laird, The Nosé-Poincaré method for constant temperature molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 151 (1999) 114–134. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  6. A.C. Branka and K.W. Wojciechowski, Generalization of Nosé and Nosé-Hoover isothermal dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 62 (2000) 3281–3292. [CrossRef]
  7. A. Bulgac and D. Kusnezov, Canonical ensemble averages from pseudomicrocanonical dynamics. Phys. Rev. A 42 (1990) 5045–5048. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. E. Cancés, F. Legoll and G. Stoltz, Theoretical and numerical comparison of some sampling methods for molecular dynamics. ESAIM: M2AN (to appear).
  9. R. Car and M. Parinello, Unified approach for molecular dynamics and density function theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (1985) 2471–2475. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. C. Chipot, Free energy calculations in biological systems: how useful are they in practice, in New Algorithms for Macromolecular Simulation, B. Leimkuhler, C. Chipot, R. Elber, A. Laaksonen, A. Mark, T. Schlick, C. Schütte and R. Skeel Eds., Springer Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering 49 (2006).
  11. J. Delhommelle, Correspondence between configurational temperature and molecular kinetic temperature thermostats. J. Chem. Phys. 117 (2002) 6016–602. [CrossRef]
  12. E.G. Flekkøy and P.V. Coveney, From molecular dynamics to dissipative particle dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 1775–1778. [CrossRef]
  13. D. Frenkel and B. Smith, Understanding Molecular Simulation. Academic, London (1996).
  14. S.P.A. Gill, Z. Jia, B. Leimkuhler and A.C.F. Cocks, Rapid thermal equilibration in coarse-grained molecular dynamics. Phys. Rev. B 73 (2006) 184304. [CrossRef]
  15. E. Hernandez, Metric-tensor flexible-cell for isothermal-isobaric molecular dynamics simulation. J. Chem. Phys. 115 (2001) 10282–10290. [CrossRef]
  16. W.G. Hoover, Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys. Rev. A 31 (1985) 1695–1697. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. W.G. Hoover, K. Aoki, C.G. Hoover and S.V. De Groot, Time reversible deterministic thermostats. Physica D (2004) 253–267.
  18. J.H. Jeans, On the vibrations set up in molecules by collisions. Phil. Mag. 6 (1903) 279–286.
  19. J.H. Jeans, On the partition of energy between matter and ether. Phil. Mag. 10 (1905) 91–97.
  20. O.G. Jepps, G. Ayton and D.J. Evans, Microscopic expressions for the thermodynamic temperature. Phys. Rev. E, 62 (2000) 4757–4763.
  21. Z. Jia and B.J. Leimkuhler, A projective thermostatting dynamics technique. Multiscale Model. Simul. 4 (2005) 563–583. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [PubMed]
  22. D. Kusnezov, Diffusive aspects of global demons. Phys. Lett. A 166 (1992) 315–320. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  23. F. Legoll, M. Luskin and R. Moeckel, Non-ergodicity of the Nosé-Hoover thermostatted harmonic oscillator, arXiv preprint (November 2005, math.DS/0511178). ARMA (to appear).
  24. B.J. Leimkuhler and C.R. Sweet, The canonical ensemble via symplectic integrators using Nosé and Nosé-Poincaré chains. J. Chem. Phys. 121 (2004) 108–116. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. B.J. Leimkuhler and C.R. Sweet, A Hamiltonian formulation for recursive multiple thermostats in a common timescale. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Sys. 4 (2005) 187–216. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  26. W.K. Liu, E.G. Karpov, S. Zhang and H.S. Park, An introduction to computational nano-mechanics and materials. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 193 (2004) 1529–1578. [CrossRef]
  27. Y. Liu and M.E. Tuckerman, Generalized Gaussian Moment Thermostatting: A new continuous dynamical approach to the canonical ensemble. J. Chem. Phys. 112 (2000) 1685–1700. [CrossRef]
  28. G.J. Martyna, M.E. Tuckerman and M.L. Klein, Nosé-Hoover chains: The canonical ensemble via continuous dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 97 (1992) 2635–2643. [CrossRef]
  29. S. Nosé, A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. J. Chem. Phys. 81 (1984) 511–519. [CrossRef]
  30. J. Powles, G. Rickayzen and D.M. Heyes, Temperature: old, new and middle-aged. Mol. Phys. 103 (2005) 1361–1373. [CrossRef]
  31. L. Rosso, P. Mináry, Z. Zhu and M.E. Tuckerman, On the use of the adiabatic molecular dynamics technique in the calculation of free energy profiles. J. Chem. Phys. 116 (2002) 4389–4402. [CrossRef]
  32. H.H. Rugh, Dynamical approach to temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 772–774. [CrossRef]
  33. T. Schneider and E. Stoll, Molecular-dynamics study of a three-dimensional one-component model for distortive phase transitions. Phys. Rev. B 17 (1978) 1302–1322. [CrossRef]
  34. J.B. Sturgeon and B.B. Laird, Symplectic algorithm for constant-pressure molecular-dynamics using a Nosé-Poincare thermostat. J. Chem. Phys. 112 (2000) 3474–3482. [CrossRef]
  35. E.B. Tadmor, M. Ortiz and R. Phillips, Quasicontinuum analysis of defects in solids. Philos. Mag. A 73 (1996) 1529–1563. [CrossRef]
  36. R.G. Winkler, V. Kraus and P. Reineker, Time-reversible and phase-conserving molecular dynamics at constant temperature. J. Chem. Phys. 102 (1995) 9018–9025. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you