Free Access
Issue
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 43, Number 1, January-February 2009
Page(s) 53 - 80
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2008042
Published online 16 October 2008
  1. Y. Achdou, O. Pironneau and F. Valentin, Effective boundary conditions for laminar flows over periodic rough boundaries. J. Comp. Phys. 147 (1998) 187–218. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  2. Y. Assou, D. Joyeux, A. Azouni and F. Feuillebois, Mesure par interférométrie laser du mouvement d'une particule proche d'une paroi. J. Phys. III 1 (1991) 315–330.
  3. L. Bocquet and J.-L. Barrat, Hydrodynamic boundary conditions, correlation functions, and Kubo relations for confined fluids. Phys. Rev. E 49 (1994) 3079–3092. [CrossRef]
  4. J.F. Brady and G. Bossis, Stokesian dynamics. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20 (1988) 111–157. [CrossRef]
  5. D. Bresh and V. Milisic, High order multi-scale wall-laws, part I: The periodic case. Quat. Appl. Math. (to appear) ArXiv:math/0611083v2.
  6. R.G. Cox, The motion of suspended particles almost in contact. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 1 (1974) 343–371. [CrossRef]
  7. R.G. Cox and H. Brenner, The slow motion of a sphere through a viscous fluid towards a plane surface – II – Small gap width, including inertial effects. Chem. Engng. Sci. 22 (1967) 1753–1777. [CrossRef]
  8. S.L. Dance and M.R. Maxey, Incorporation of lubrication effects into the force-coupling method for particulate two-phase flow. J. Comp. Phys. 189 (2003) 212–238. [CrossRef]
  9. B. Desjardin and M.J. Esteban, Existence of weak solutions for the motion of rigid bodies in a viscous fluid. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 146 (1999) 59–71. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  10. A. Einstein, A new method of determining molecular dimensions. Ann. Phys. Leipsig 19 (1906) 289–306. [CrossRef]
  11. A. Einstein, Correction to my work: a new determination of molecular dimensions. Ann. Phys. Leipsig 34 (1911) 591–592. [CrossRef]
  12. E. Feireisl, On the motion of rigid bodies in a viscous incompressible fluid. J. Evol. Equ. 3 (2003) 419–441. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  13. R. Glowinski, T.-W. Pan, T.I. Heslaand and D.D. Joseph, A distributed Lagrange multiplier/fictitious domain method for particulate flows. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 25 (1999) 755–794. [CrossRef]
  14. M. Hillairet, Lack of collision between solid bodies in a 2D constant-density incompressible viscous flow. Comm. Partial Diff. Eq. 32 (2007) 1345–1371. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  15. H.H. Hu, Direct simulation of flows of solid-liquid mixtures. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 22 (1996) 335–352. [CrossRef]
  16. A.A. Johnson and T.E. Tezduyar, Simulation of multiple spheres falling in a liquid-filled tube. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 134 (1996) 351–373. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  17. S. Labbé, J. Laminie and V. Louvet, CSiMoon. Calcul scientifique, méthodologie orientée objet et environnement: de l'analyse mathématique à la programmation. Technical report RT 2001-01, Laboratoire de Mathématiques, Université Paris-Sud, France (2004).
  18. N. Lecocq, F. Feuillebois, N. Anthore, R. Anthore, F. Bostel and C. Petipas, Precise measurement of particle-wall hydrodynamic interactions at low Reynolds number using laser interferometry. Phys. Fluids A 5 (1993) 3–12. [CrossRef]
  19. N. Lecoq, R. Anthore, B. Cichocki, P. Szymczak and F. Feuillebois, Drag force on a sphere moving towards a corrugated wall. J. Fluid Mech. 513 (2004) 247–264. [CrossRef]
  20. A. Lefebvre, Fluid-Particle simulations with FreeFem++, in ESAIM: Proceedings 18, J.-F. Gerbeau and S. Labbé Eds. (2007) 120–132.
  21. A. Lefebvre, Simulation numérique d'écoulements fluide/particules. Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris-Sud XI, Orsay, France (Nov. 2007).
  22. B. Maury, A many-body lubrication model. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 325 (1997) 1053–1058.
  23. B. Maury, Direct simulation of 2D fluid-particle flows in biperiodic domains. J. Comp. Phys. 156 (1999) 325–351. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  24. B. Maury, A time-stepping scheme for inelastic collisions. Numer. Math. 102 (2006) 649–679. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  25. B. Maury, A gluey particle model, in ESAIM: Proceedings 18, J.-F. Gerbeau and S. Labbé Eds. (2007) 133–142.
  26. S. Nasseri, N. Phan-Thien and X.J. Fan, Lubrication approximation in completed double layer boundary element method. Comput. Mech. 26 (2000) 388–397. [CrossRef]
  27. N.A. Patankar, P. Singh, D.D. Joseph, R. Glowinski and T.-W. Pan, A new formulations for the distributed Lagrange multiplier/fictitious domain method for particulate flows. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 26 (2000) 1509–1524. [CrossRef]
  28. S. Richardson, A model for the boundary condition of a porous material. Part 2. J. Fluid Mech. 49 (1971) 327–336. [CrossRef]
  29. J.A. San Matín, V. Starovoitov and M. Tucsnak, Global weak solutions for the two-dimensional motion of several rigid bodies in an incompressible viscous fluid. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 161 (2002) 113–147. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  30. P. Singh, T.I. Hesla and D.D. Joseph, Distributed Lagrange multiplier method for particulate flows with collisions. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 29 (2003) 495–509. [CrossRef]
  31. J.R. Smart and D.T. Leighton, Measurement of the hydrodynamic roughness of non colloidal spheres. Phys. Fluids A 1 (1989) 52. [CrossRef]
  32. D.E. Stewart, Rigid-body dynamics with friction and impact. SIAM Rev. 42 (2000) 3–39. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  33. T. Takahashi, Analysis of strong solutions for the equations modeling the motion of a rigid-fluid system in a bounded domain. Adv. Differential Equations 8 (2003) 1499–1532. [MathSciNet]
  34. T. Takahashi, Existence of strong solutions for the problem of a rigid-fluid system. C.R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 336 (2003) 453–458. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  35. G.I. Taylor, A model for the boundary condition of a porous material. Part 1. J. Fluid Mech. 49 (1971) 319–326. [CrossRef]
  36. O.I. Vinogradova and G.E. Yacubov, Surface roughness and hydrodynamic boundary conditions. Phys. Rev. E 73 (2006) 045302(R).
  37. D. Wan and S. Turek, Direct numerical simulation of particulate flow via multigrid FEM techniques and the fictitious boundary method. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 51 (2006) 531–566. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you