EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 58 / No 2 (March-April 2024) ESAIM: M2AN, 58 2 (2024) 723-757 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 58, Number 2, March-April 2024
Page(s) 723 - 757
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2024012
Published online 19 April 2024
  1. A.-J.-C. Barré de Saint-Venant, Théorie du mouvement non permanent des eaux, avec application aux crues des rivières et à l’introduction des marées dans leur lit. Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l’Académie des sciences (1871). [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Benzoni-Gavage and D. Serre, Multi-dimensional Hyperbolic Partial Differential Equations: First-order Systems and Applications. Oxford University Press on Demand (2007). [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Bermudez and M.E. Vazquez, Upwind methods for hyperbolic conservation laws with source terms. Comput. Fluids 23 (1994) 1049–1071. [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Bryson, Y. Epshteyn, A. Kurganov and G. Petrova, Well-balanced positivity preserving central-upwind scheme on triangular grids for the Saint-Venant system. ESAIM: Math. Modell. Numer. Anal. 45 (2011) 423–446. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Chen, C. Dawson and E. Valseth, Cross-mode stabilized stochastic shallow water systems using stochastic finite element methods. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 405 (2023) 115873. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Chertock, S. Cui, A. Kurganov and T. Wu, Well-balanced positivity preserving central-upwind scheme for the shallow water system with friction terms. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 78 (2015) 355–383. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Chertock, S. Jin and A. Kurganov, A well-balanced operator splitting based stochastic Galerkin method for the one-dimensional Saint-Venant system with uncertainty. Preprint https://chertock.wordpress.ncsu.edu/files/2019/10/CJK2.pdf (2015). [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Cohen and R. Moussa, Approximation of high-dimensional parametric PDEs. Acta Numer. 24 (2015) 1–159. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  9. N. Črnjarić-Žic, S. Vuković and L. Sopta, Balanced finite volume WENO and central WENO schemes for the shallow water and the open-channel flow equations. J. Comput. Phys. 200 (2004) 512–548. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  10. C.M. Dafermos, Hyperbolic Conservation Laws in Continuum Physics. Springer (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Dai, Y. Epshteyn and A. Narayan, Hyperbolicity-preserving and well-balanced stochastic Galerkin method for shallow water equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 43 (2021) A929–A952. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Dai, Y. Epshteyn and A. Narayan, Hyperbolicity-preserving and well-balanced stochastic Galerkin method for two-dimensional shallow water equations. J. Comput. Phys. 452 (2022) 110901. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. B.J. Debusschere, H.N. Najm, P.P. Pébay, O.M. Knio, R.G. Ghanem and O.P. Le Maître, Numerical challenges in the use of polynomial chaos representations for stochastic processes. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 26 (2004) 698–719. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  14. Y. Epshteyn and T. Moussa, Adaptive central-upwind scheme on triangular grids for the Saint-Venant system. Commun. Math. Sci. 21 (2023) 671–708. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  15. O.G. Ernst, A. Mugler, H.-J. Starkloff and E. Ullmann, On the convergence of generalized polynomial chaos expansions. ESAIM: Math. Modell. Numer. Anal. 46 (2012) 317–339. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  16. U. Fjordholm, S. Mishra and E. Tadmor, Energy Preserving and Energy Stable Schemes for the Shallow Water Equations. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series. Cambridge University Press (2009) 93–139. [Google Scholar]
  17. U.S. Fjordholm, S. Mishra and E. Tadmor, Well-balanced and energy stable schemes for the shallow water equations with discontinuous topography. J. Comput. Phys. 230 (2011) 5587–5609. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  18. U.S. Fjordholm, S. Mishra and E. Tadmor, Arbitrarily high-order accurate entropy stable essentially nonoscillatory schemes for systems of conservation laws. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 50 (2012) 544–573. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Gerster and M. Moussa, Entropies and symmetrization of hyperbolic stochastic Galerkin formulations. Commun. Comput. Phys. 27 (2020) 639–671. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Gerster, A. Sikstel and G. Visconti, Haar-type stochastic Galerkin formulations for hyperbolic systems with Lipschitz continuous flux function. Preprint arXiv:2203.11718 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Gottlieb, C.-W. Shu and E. Tadmor, Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods. SIAM Rev. 43 (2001) 89–112. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Jin, D. Xiu and X. Zhu, A well-balanced stochastic galerkin method for scalar hyperbolic balance laws with random inputs. J. Sci. Comput. 67 (2016) 1198–1218. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Kurganov, Finite-volume schemes for shallow-water equations. Acta Numer. 27 (2018) 289–351. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Kurganov and D. Moussa, Central-upwind schemes for the Saint-Venant system. ESAIM: Math. Modell. Numer. Anal. 36 (2002) 397–425. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Kurganov and G. Moussa, A second-order well-balanced positivity preserving central-upwind scheme for the Saint-Venant system. Commun. Math. Sci. 5 (2007) 133–160. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  26. J. Kusch, R.G. McClarren and M. Frank, Filtered stochastic Galerkin methods for hyperbolic equations. J. Comput. Phys. 403 (2020) 109073. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  27. R.J. LeVeque, Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws. Springer (1992). [Google Scholar]
  28. R.J. LeVeque, Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems. Cambridge University Press (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. X. Liu, J. Albright, Y. Epshteyn and A. Kurganov, Well-balanced positivity preserving central-upwind scheme with a novel wet/dry reconstruction on triangular grids for the Saint-Venant system. J. Comput. Phys. 374 (2018) 213–236. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  30. G. Poëtte, B. Després, and D. Lucor, Uncertainty quantification for systems of conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 228 (2009) 2443–2467. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  31. R. Pulch and D. Moussa, Generalised polynomial chaos for a class of linear conservation laws. J. Sci. Comput. 51 (2012) 293–312. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  32. B.D. Rogers, A.G.L. Borthwick and P.H. Taylor, Mathematical balancing of flux gradient and source terms prior to using Roe’s approximate Riemann solver. J. Comput. Phys. 192 (2003) 422–451. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  33. L. Schlachter and F. Moussa, A hyperbolicity-preserving stochastic Galerkin approximation for uncertain hyperbolic systems of equations. J. Comput. Phys. 375 (2018) 80–98. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  34. R.C. Smith, Uncertainty Quantification: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. SIAM-Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. T.J. Sullivan. Introduction to Uncertainty Quantification. Vol. 63. Springer (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. E. Tadmor, The numerical viscosity of entropy stable schemes for systems of conservation laws. I. Math. Comput. 49 (1987) 91–103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. E. Tadmor, Entropy stability theory for difference approximations of nonlinear conservation laws and related time-dependent problems. Acta Numer. 12 (2003) 451–512. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  38. K. Wu, H. Tang and D. Xiu, A stochastic Galerkin method for first-order quasilinear hyperbolic systems with uncertainty. J. Comput. Phys. 345 (2017) 224–244. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  39. Y. Xing, High order finite volume WENO schemes for the shallow water flows through channels with irregular geometry. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 299 (2016) 229–244. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  40. Y. Xing, Chapter 13 – numerical methods for the nonlinear shallow water equations, in Handbook of Numerical Analysis. Vol. 18 of Handbook of Numerical Methods for Hyperbolic Problems, edited by R. Abgrall and C.-W. Shu. (2017) 361–384. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Y. Xing and C.-W. Shu, High order finite difference WENO schemes with the exact conservation property for the shallow water equations. J. Comput. Phys. 208 (2005) 206–227. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  42. Y. Xing and C.-W. Shu, High order well-balanced finite volume WENO schemes and discontinuous Galerkin methods for a class of hyperbolic systems with source terms. J. Comput. Phys. 214 (2006) 567–598. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  43. Y. Xing and C.-W. Shu, A new approach of high order well-balanced finite volume WENO schemes and discontinuous Galerkin methods for a class of hyperbolic systems with source terms. Commun. Comput. Phys. 1 (2006) 100–134. [Google Scholar]
  44. D. Xiu, Numerical Methods for Stochastic Computations: A Spectral Method Approach. Princeton University Press (2010). [Google Scholar]
  45. X. Zhong and C.-W. Shu, Entropy stable Galerkin methods with suitable quadrature rules for hyperbolic systems with random inputs. J. Sci. Comput. 92 (2022) 14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. T. Zhou and T. Moussa, Galerkin methods for stochastic hyperbolic problems using bi-orthogonal polynomials. J. Sci. Comput. 51 (2012) 274–292. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  47. J.G. Zhou, D.M. Causon, C.G. Mingham and D.M. Ingram, The surface gradient method for the treatment of source terms in the shallow-water equations. J. Comput. Phys. 168 (2001) 1–25. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you