EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 59 / No 6 (November-December 2025) ESAIM: M2AN, 59 6 (2025) 3341-3362 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 59, Number 6, November-December 2025
Page(s) 3341 - 3362
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2025090
Published online 17 December 2025
  1. R.A. Adams and J.J.F. Fournier, Sobolev Spaces. Vol. 140 of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 2nd edition. Academic Press, Amsterdam (2003). [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Akrivis, M. Feischl, B. Kovács and C. Lubich, Higher-order linearly implicit full discretization of the Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equation. Math. Comput. 90 (2021) 995–1038. [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Alouges, A new finite element scheme for Landau–Lifchitz equations. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 1 (2008) 187–196. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  4. F. Alouges and P. Jaisson, Convergence of a finite element discretization for the Landau–Lifshitz equations in micromagnetism. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 16 (2006) 299–316. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Alouges and A. Soyeur, On global weak solutions for Landau–Lifshitz equations: existence and nonuniqueness. Nonlinear Anal. 18 (1992) 1071–1084. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  6. F. Alouges, E. Kritsikis, J. Steiner and J.C. Toussaint, A convergent and precise finite element scheme for Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equation. Numer. Math. 128 (2014) 407–430. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  7. R. An, Optimal error estimates of linearized Crank–Nicolson Galerkin method for Landau–Lifshitz equation. J. Sci. Comput. 69 (2016) 1–27. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  8. R. An and W. Sun, Analysis of backward Euler projection FEM for the Landau–Lifshitz equation. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 42 (2022) 2336–2360. [Google Scholar]
  9. R. An, H. Gao and W. Sun, Optimal error analysis of Euler and Crank–Nicolson projection finite difference schemes for Landau–Lifshitz equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 59 (2021) 1639–1662. [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Badia, F. Guillén-González and J.V. Gutiérrez-Santacreu, Finite element approximation of nematic liquid crystal flows using a saddle-point structure. J. Comput. Phys. 230 (2011) 1686–1706. [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Bartels and A. Prohl, Convergence of an implicit finite element method for the Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 44 (2006) 1405–1419. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Bartels and A. Prohl, Constraint preserving implicit finite element discretization of harmonic map flow into spheres. Math. Comput. 76 (2007) 1847–1859. [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Bartels, C. Lubich and A. Prohl, Convergent discretization of heat and wave map flows to spheres using approximate discrete Lagrange multipliers. Math. Comput. 78 (2009) 1269–1292. [Google Scholar]
  14. S.C. Brenner and L.R. Scott, The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods. Vol. 15 of Texts in Applied Mathematics, 3rd edition. Springer, New York (2008). [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. Cai, J. Chen, C. Wang and C. Xie, Error analysis of a linear numerical scheme for the Landau–Lifshitz equation with large damping parameters. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 46 (2023) 18952–18974. [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Carbou and P. Fabrie, Regular solutions for Landau–Lifschitz equation in a bounded domain. Differ. Integral Equ. 14 (2001) 213–229. [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Chen, C. Wang and C. Xie, Convergence analysis of a second-order semi-implicit projection method for Landau–Lifshitz equation. Appl. Numer. Math. 168 (2021) 55–74. [Google Scholar]
  18. Q. Cheng and J. Shen, A new Lagrange multiplier approach for constructing structure preserving schemes, I. Positivity preserving. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 391 (2022) 114585. [Google Scholar]
  19. Q. Cheng and J. Shen, A new Lagrange multiplier approach for constructing structure preserving schemes, II. Bound preserving. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 60 (2022) 970–998. [Google Scholar]
  20. Q. Cheng and J. Shen, Length preserving numerical schemes for Landau–Lifshitz equation based on Lagrange multiplier approaches. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 45 (2023) A530–A553. [Google Scholar]
  21. M.J.S. Chin-Joe-Kong, W.A. Mulder and M. Van Veldhuizen, Higher-order triangular and tetrahedral finite elements with mass lumping for solving the wave equation. J. Eng. Math. 35 (1999) 405–426. [Google Scholar]
  22. I. Cimrák, Error estimates for a semi-implicit numerical scheme solving the Landau–Lifshitz equation with an exchange field. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 25 (2005) 611–634. [Google Scholar]
  23. I. Cimrák, A survey on the numerics and computations for the Landau–Lifshitz equation of micromagnetism. Arch. Comput. 15 (2008) 277–309. [Google Scholar]
  24. I. Cimrák and R. Van Keer, Higher order regularity results in 3D for the Landau–Lifshitz equation with an exchange field. Nonlinear Anal. 68 (2008) 1316–1331. [Google Scholar]
  25. G. Cohen, P. Joly, J.E. Roberts and N. Tordjman, Higher order triangular finite elements with mass lumping for the wave equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 38 (2001) 2047–2078. [Google Scholar]
  26. W. E and X.-P. Wang, Numerical methods for the Landau–Lifshitz equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 38 (2000) 1647–1665. [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Feischl and T. Tran, Existence of regular solutions of the Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equation in 3D with natural boundary conditions. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 49 (2017) 4470–4490. [Google Scholar]
  28. M. Feischl and T. Tran, The eddy current–LLG equations: FEM-BEM coupling and a priori error estimates. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 55 (2017) 1786–1819. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  29. H. Gao, Optimal error estimates of a linearized backward Euler FEM for the Landau–Lifshitz equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 52 (2014) 2574–2593. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  30. T.L. Gilbert, A Lagrangian formulation of the gyromagnetic equation of the magnetization field. Phys. Rev. D 100 (1955) 1243. [Google Scholar]
  31. X. Gui, B. Li and J. Wang, Convergence of renormalized finite element methods for heat flow of harmonic maps. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 60 (2022) 312–338. [Google Scholar]
  32. B. Guo and S. Ding, Landau–Lifshitz Equations. Vol. 1 of Frontiers of Research with the Chinese Academy of Sciences. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ (2008). [Google Scholar]
  33. J.V. Gutiérrez-Santacreu and M. Restelli, Inf-sup stable finite element methods for the Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert and harmonic map heat flow equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 55 (2017) 2565–2591. [Google Scholar]
  34. D.A. Ham, P.H.J. Kelly, L. Mitchell, C.J. Cotter, R.C. Kirby, K. Sagiyama, N. Bouziani, S. Vorderwuelbecke, T.J. Gregory, J. Betteridge, D.R. Shapero, R.W. Nixon-Hill, C.J. Ward, P.E. Farrell, P.D. Brubeck, I. Marsden, T.H. Gibson, M. Homolya, T. Sun, A.T.T. McRae, F. Luporini, A. Gregory, M. Lange, S.W. Funke, F. Rathgeber, G.-T. Bercea and G.R. Markall, Firedrake User Manual, 1st edition. Imperial College London and University of Oxford and Baylor University and University of Washington (2023). [Google Scholar]
  35. J.G. Heywood and R. Rannacher, Finite-element approximation of the nonstationary Navier–Stokes problem part IV: error analysis for second-order time discretization. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 27 (1990) 353–384. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  36. M. Kruzík and A. Prohl, Recent developments in the modeling, analysis, and numerics of ferromagnetism. SIAM Rev. 48 (2006) 439–483. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  37. L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, On the theory of the dispersion of magnetic permeability in ferromagnetic bodies. Phys. Zeitsch. der Sow. 8 (1935) 153–169. [Google Scholar]
  38. C. Liu and N.J. Walkington, Approximation of liquid crystal flows. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 37 (2000) 725–741. [Google Scholar]
  39. F. Pistella and V. Valente, Numerical stability of a discrete model in the dynamics of ferromagnetic bodies. Numer. Methods Part. Differ. Equ. 15 (1999) 544–557. [Google Scholar]
  40. A. Prohl, Computational Micromagnetism. Advances in Numerical Mathematics. B.G. Teubner, Stuttgart (2001). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you