EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 59 / No 6 (November-December 2025) ESAIM: M2AN, 59 6 (2025) 2991-3020 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 59, Number 6, November-December 2025
Page(s) 2991 - 3020
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2025081
Published online 07 November 2025
  1. B. Andreianov, C. Cancès and A. Moussa, A nonlinear time compactness result and applications to discretization of degenerate parabolic–elliptic PDEs. J. Funct. Anal. 273 (2017) 3633–3670. [Google Scholar]
  2. J.D. Audu, F.A. Fairag and S.A. Messaoudi, On the well-posedness of generalized Darcy–Forchheimer equation. Bound. Value Prob. 2018 (2018) 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Brunk and M. Fritz, Analysis and discretization of the Ohta–Kawasaki equation with forcing and degenerate mobility. Preprint arXiv:2411.09498 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Brunk and M. Fritz, Structure-preserving approximation of the Cahn–Hilliard–Biot system. Numer. Methods Part. Differ. Equ. 41 (2025) e23159. [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Brunk, H. Egger, O. Habrich and M. Lukacova-Medvidova, A second-order fully-balanced structure-preserving variational discretization scheme for the Cahn–Hilliard–Navier–Stokes system. Math. Model Methods Appl. Sci. 33 (2023) 2587–2627. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Brunk, H. Egger, O. Habrich and M. Lukáčová-Medviˇdová, Stability and discretization error analysis for the Cahn–Hilliard system via relative energy estimates. ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 57 (2023) 1297–1322. [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Brunk, O. Habrich, T.D. Oyedeji, Y. Yang and B.-X. Xu, Variational approximation for a non-isothermal coupled phase-field system: structure-preservation & nonlinear stability. Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 25 (2025) 373–396. [Google Scholar]
  8. A.E. Diegel, C. Wang, X. Wang and S.M. Wise, Convergence analysis and error estimates for a second order accurate finite element method for the Cahn–Hilliard–Navier–Stokes system. Numer. Math. 137 (2017) 495–534. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Ebenbeck and H. Garcke, Analysis of a Cahn–Hilliard–Brinkman model for tumour growth with chemotaxis. J. Differ. Equ. 266 (2019) 5998–6036. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Ebenbeck and H. Garcke, On a Cahn–Hilliard–Brinkman Model for tumor growth and its Singular Limits. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 51 (2019) 1868–1912. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Ebenbeck and K.F. Lam, Weak and stationary solutions to a Cahn–Hilliard–Brinkman model with singular potentials and source terms. Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 10 (2020) 24–65. [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Egger, Structure preserving approximation of dissipative evolution problems. Numer. Math. 143 (2019) 85–106. [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Fabrie, Regularity of the solution of Darcy–Forchheimer’s equation. Nonlinear Anal. Theory Methods Appl. 13 (1989) 1025–1049. [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Fritz, Tumor evolution models of phase-field type with nonlocal effects and angiogenesis. Bull. Math. Biol. 85 (2023) 44. [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Fritz, E. Lima, V. Nikolić, J.T. Oden and B. Wohlmuth, Local and nonlocal phase-field models of tumor growth and invasion due to ECM degradation. Math. Model Methods Appl. Sci. 29 (2019) 2433–2468. [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Fritz, E. Lima, J.T. Oden and B. Wohlmuth, On the unsteady Darcy–Forchheimer–Brinkman equation in local and nonlocal tumor growth models. Math. Model Methods Appl. Sci. 29 (2019) 1691–1731. [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Fritz, P.K. Jha, T. Köppl, J.T. Oden and B. Wohlmuth, Analysis of a new multispecies tumor growth model coupling 3D phase-fields with a 1D vascular network. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 61 (2021) 103331. [Google Scholar]
  18. G. Galdi, An Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of the Navier–Stokes Equations: Steady-State Problems. Springer Science & Business Media (2011). [Google Scholar]
  19. H. Garcke and K.F. Lam, Global weak solutions and asymptotic limits of a Cahn–Hilliard–Darcy system modelling tumour growth. AIMS Math. 1 (2016) 318–360. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Garcke and K.F. Lam, Analysis of a Cahn–Hilliard system with non-zero Dirichlet conditions modeling tumor growth with chemotaxis. Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst. A 37 (2017) 4277–4308. [Google Scholar]
  21. H. Garcke and K.F. Lam, Well-posedness of a Cahn–Hilliard system modelling tumour growth with chemotaxis and active transport. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 28 (2017) 284–316. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. H. Garcke and K.F. Lam, On a Cahn–Hilliard–Darcy system for tumour growth with solution dependent source terms, in Trends in Applications of Mathematics to Mechanics, edited E. Rocca, U. Stefanelli, L. Truskinovsky and A. Visintin. Springer (2018) 243–264. [Google Scholar]
  23. H. Garcke, K.F. Lam, E. Sitka and V. Styles, A Cahn–Hilliard–Darcy model for tumour growth with chemotaxis and active transport. Math. Model Methods Appl. Sci. 26 (2016) 1095–1148. [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Giorgini, K.F. Lam, E. Rocca and G. Schimperna, On the existence of strong solutions to the Cahn–Hilliard–Darcy system with mass source. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 54 (2022) 737–767. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  25. V. Girault and M.F. Wheeler, Numerical discretization of a Darcy–Forchheimer model. Numer. Math. 110 (2008) 161–198. [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Hawkins-Daarud, K.G. van der Zee and J. Tinsley Oden, Numerical simulation of a thermodynamically consistent four-species tumor growth model. Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng. 28 (2012) 3–24. [Google Scholar]
  27. J.G. Heywood and R. Rannacher, Finite element approximation of the nonstationary Navier–Stokes problem. I. Regularity of solutions and second-order error estimates for spatial discretization. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 19 (1982) 275–311. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  28. J. Hu and G. Zhou, The well-posedness and discontinuous Galerkin approximation for the Non-Newtonian Stokes–Darcy–Forchheimer coupling system. J. Sci. Comput. 97 (2023) 24. [Google Scholar]
  29. J. Jiang, H. Wu and S. Zheng, Well-posedness and long-time behavior of a non-autonomous Cahn–Hilliard–Darcy system with mass source modeling tumor growth. J. Differ. Equ. 259 (2015) 3032–3077. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. T. Kieu, Existence of a solution for generalized Forchheimer flow in porous media with minimal regularity conditions. J. Math. Phys. 61 (2020) 013507. [Google Scholar]
  31. P. Knabner and J.E. Roberts, Mathematical analysis of a discrete fracture model coupling Darcy flow in the matrix with Darcy–Forchheimer flow in the fracture. ESAIM: Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 48 (2014) 1451–1472. [Google Scholar]
  32. P. Knabner and G. Summ, Sovability of the mixed formulation for Darcy–Forchheimer flow in porous media. Preprint arXiv:1608.08829 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  33. P. Knopf and A. Signori, Existence of weak solutions to multiphase Cahn–Hilliard–Darcy and Cahn–Hilliard–Brinkman models for stratified tumor growth with chemotaxis and general source terms. Commun. Part. Differ. Equ. 47 (2022) 233–278. [Google Scholar]
  34. H. Pan and H. Rui, Mixed element method for two-dimensional Darcy–Forchheimer model. J. Sci. Comput. 52 (2012) 563–587. [Google Scholar]
  35. T. Roubíček, Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations with Applications. Springer (2013). [Google Scholar]
  36. J. Schöberl, C++11 implementation of finite elements in NGSolve. Technical Report 30, ASC (Institute for Analysis and Scientific Computing) Report, TU Wien (2014). [Google Scholar]
  37. J. Sprekels and H. Wu, Optimal distributed control of a Cahn–Hilliard–Darcy system with mass sources. Appl. Math. Optim. 83 (2021) 489–530. [Google Scholar]
  38. S. Srinivasan and K.R. Rajagopal, A thermodynamic basis for the derivation of the darcy, forchheimer and brinkman models for flows through porous media and their generalizations. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 58 (2014) 162–166. [Google Scholar]
  39. S. Whitaker, The Forchheimer equation: a theoretical development. Transp. Porous Media 25 (1996) 27–61. [Google Scholar]
  40. E. Zeidler, Nonlinear Functional Analysis and its Applications I: Fixed-Point Theorems. Springer (1986). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you