EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Sciengine logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 60 / No 2 (March-April 2026) ESAIM: M2AN, 60 2 (2026) 871-908 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 60, Number 2, March-April 2026
Page(s) 871 - 908
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2026021
Published online 09 April 2026
  1. A. Ern and J.L. Guermond, Finite Elements I. Vol. 1084. Springer (2021). [Google Scholar]
  2. G.S. Beavers and D.D. Joseph, Boundary conditions at a naturally permeable wall. J. Fluid. Mech. 30 (1967) 197–207. [Google Scholar]
  3. S.C. Brenner, Poincaré-Friedrichs inequalities for piecewise H1 functions. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 41 (2003) 306–324. [Google Scholar]
  4. F. Brezzi and M. Fortin, Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods. Vol. 15. Springer Science & Business Media (2012). [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Brezzi, J. Douglas and L.D. Marini, Two families of mixed finite elements for second order elliptic problems. Numer. Math. 47 (1985) 217–235. [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Castanon Quiroz and D.A. Di Pietro, A hybrid high-order method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes problem robust for large irrotational body forces. Comput. Math. Appl. 79 (2020) 2655–2677. [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Caucao, M. Discacciati, G.N. Gatica and R. Oyarzúa, A conforming mixed finite element method for the Navier-Stokes/Darcy-Forchheimer coupled problem. ESAIM-Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 54 (2020) 1689–1723. [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Cesmelioglu and S. Rhebergen, A hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin method for the coupled Navier-Stokes and Darcy problem. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 422 (2023) 114923. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Cesmelioglu, S. Rhebergen and G.N. Wells, An embedded–hybridized discontinuous Galerkin method for the coupled Stokes–Darcy system. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 367 (2020) 112476. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Cesmelioglu, J.J. Lee and S. Rhebergen, A strongly conservative hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin method for the coupled time-dependent Navier–Stokes and Darcy problem. ESAIM-Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 58 (2024) 273–302. [Google Scholar]
  11. N. Chaabane, V. Girault, C. Puelz and B. Riviere, Convergence of IPDG for coupled time-dependent Navier–Stokes and Darcy equations. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 324 (2017) 25–48. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  12. E.T. Chung and B. Engquist, Optimal discontinuous Galerkin methods for the acoustic wave equation in higher dimensions. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47 (2009) 3820–3848. [Google Scholar]
  13. P.G. Ciarlet, Linear and Nonlinear Functional Analysis with Applications. SIAM (2025). [Google Scholar]
  14. D.A. Di Pietro and A. Ern, Mathematical Aspects of Discontinuous Galerkin Methods. Vol. 69. Springer Science & Business Media (2011). [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Discacciati and R. Oyarzáu, A conforming mixed finite element method for the Navier–Stokes/Darcy coupled problem. Numer. Math. 135 (2017) 571–606. [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Discacciati, A. Quarteroni and A. Valli, Robin–Robin domain decomposition methods for the Stokes–Darcy coupling. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 45 (2007) 1246–1268. [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Ern and J.-L. Guermond, Finite Elements II. Springer (2021). [Google Scholar]
  18. P.H. Forchheimer, Wasserbewegung durch boden. z. vereines dtsch. Ingenieur 45 (1901) 1792–1788. [Google Scholar]
  19. G. Galdi, An Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of the Navier–Stokes Equations: Steady-State Problems. Springer Science & Business Media (2011). [Google Scholar]
  20. G.N. Gatica, A simple introduction to the mixed finite element method, in Theory and Applications. Springer Briefs in Mathematics. Springer, London (2014). [Google Scholar]
  21. G.N. Gatica, S. Meddahi and R. Oyarzáu, A conforming mixed finite-element method for the coupling of fluid flow with porous media flow. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 29 (2009) 86–108. [Google Scholar]
  22. G.N. Gatica, G.C. Hsiao and S. Meddahi, A coupled mixed finite element method for the interaction problem between an electromagnetic field and an elastic body. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 48 (2010) 1338–1368. [Google Scholar]
  23. G.N. Gatica, R. Oyarzáu and F.-J. Sayas, Convergence of a family of Galerkin discretizations for the Stokes–Darcy coupled problem. Numer. Meth. Part Differ. Equ. 27 (2011) 721–748. [Google Scholar]
  24. G.N. Gatica, R. Oyarzáu and N. Valenzuela, A five-field augmented fully-mixed finite element method for the Navier–Stokes/Darcy coupled problem. Comput. Math. Appl. 80 (2020) 1944–1963. [Google Scholar]
  25. V. Girault and B. Rivière, DG approximation of coupled Navier–Stokes and Darcy equations by Beaver–Joseph– Saffman interface condition. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47 (2009) 2052–2089. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  26. V. Girault and M.F. Wheeler, Numerical discretization of a Darcy–Forchheimer model. Numer. Math. 110 (2008) 161–198. [Google Scholar]
  27. P. Houston, D. Schötzau and X. Wei, A mixed DG method for linearized incompressible magnetohydrodynamics. J. Sci. Comput. 40 (2009) 281–314. [Google Scholar]
  28. D. Kim, L. Zhao, E.T. Chung and E.-J. Park, Pressure-robust staggered DG methods for the Navier–Stokes equations on general meshes. Preprint arXiv:2107.09226 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Linke, On the role of the Helmholtz decomposition in mixed methods for incompressible flows and a new variational crime. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 268 (2014) 782–800. [Google Scholar]
  30. A. Linke and C. Merdon, On velocity errors due to irrotational forces in the Navier–Stokes momentum balance. J. Comput. Phys. 313 (2016) 654–661. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  31. J. Liu, Y. Liu and L. Zhao, Analysis of the staggered DG method for the quasi-Newtonian Stokes flows. J. Sci. Comput. 102 (2025) 14. [Google Scholar]
  32. G.J. Minty, On a monotonicity method for the solution of nonlinear equations in Banach spaces. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 50 (1963) 1038–1041. [Google Scholar]
  33. P.A. Nguyen and J.-P. Raymond, Boundary stabilization of the Navier–Stokes equations in the case of mixed boundary conditions. SIAM J. Control Optim. 53 (2015) 3006–3039. [Google Scholar]
  34. G. Roland and A. Marroco, Sur l’approximation, par éléments finis d’ordre un, et la résolution, par pénalisationdualit é d’une classe de problèmes de Dirichlet non linéaires. Anal. Numer. 9 (1975) 41–76. [Google Scholar]
  35. P.G. Saffman, On the boundary condition at the surface of a porous medium. Stud. Appl. Math. 50 (1971) 93–101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. L. Zhao and E.-J. Park, A lowest-order staggered DG method for the coupled Stokes–Darcy problem. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 40 (2020) 2871–2897. [Google Scholar]
  37. L. Zhao and S. Sun, A strongly mass conservative method for the coupled Brinkman–Darcy flow and transport. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 45 (2023) B166–B199. [Google Scholar]
  38. L. Zhao, E.T. Chung and M.F. Lam, A new staggered DG method for the Brinkman problem robust in the Darcy and Stokes limits. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 364 (2020) 112986. [Google Scholar]
  39. L. Zhao, E.T. Chung, E.-J. Park and G. Zhou, Staggered DG method for coupling of the Stokes and Darcy– Forchheimer problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 59 (2021) 1–31. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you