A Roe-type scheme for two-phase shallow granular flows over variable topography
ESAIM: M2AN, 42 5 (2008) 851-885
Published online: 2008-07-30
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
A series of two-phase models for grain–fluid flows with dilatancy
François Bouchut, Elias Drach, Enrique D. Fernández-Nieto, Anne Mangeney and Gladys Narbona-ReinaJournal of Fluid Mechanics 1008 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2025.131
High-Order Well-Balanced Methods for the Euler Equations of Gas Dynamics with Gravitational Forces and the Ripa Model
I. Gómez-Bueno, M. J. Castro and C. ParésJournal of Scientific Computing 102 (3) (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-024-02781-1
A three-layer model for the flow of particulate suspensions driven by sedimentation
Andrea Bondesan, Laurence Girolami, François James and Loïc RousseauPhysics of Fluids 37 (4) (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0261889
Recasting an operator splitting solver into a standard finite volume flux-based algorithm. The case of a Lagrange-projection-type method for gas dynamics
Rémi Bourgeois, Pascal Tremblin, Samuel Kokh and Thomas PadioleauJournal of Computational Physics 496 112594 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2023.112594
A scalable well-balanced numerical scheme for the modeling of two-phase shallow granular landslide consolidation
Federico Gatti, Carlo de Falco, Simona Perotto, Luca Formaggia and Manuel PastorJournal of Computational Physics 501 112798 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2024.112798
Mixing-phase model for shear-induced contractive/dilative effects in unsteady water-sediment mixture flows
S. Martínez-Aranda, J. Fernández-Pato and P. García-NavarroAdvances in Water Resources 188 104710 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2024.104710
Modeling Phase Separation in Grain‐Fluid Mixture Flows by a Depth‐Averaged Approach With Dilatancy Effects
Weihang Sun and Yongqi WangJournal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 129 (12) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JF007416
Efficient Finite Difference WENO Scheme for Hyperbolic Systems with Non-conservative Products
Dinshaw S. Balsara, Deepak Bhoriya, Chi-Wang Shu and Harish KumarCommunications on Applied Mathematics and Computation 6 (2) 907 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42967-023-00275-9
Numerical Modeling of Downstream Morphological Evolution during Mount Polley Tailings Dam Failure
Uthra Sreekumar, Ioan Nistor, Colin Rennie and Abdolmajid MohammadianJournal of Hydraulic Engineering 150 (1) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1061/JHEND8.HYENG-13497
Granular-fluid avalanches: the role of vertical structure and velocity shear
X. Meng, A.M. Taylor-Noonan, C.G. Johnson, W.A. Take, E.T. Bowman and J.M.N.T. GrayJournal of Fluid Mechanics 980 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2023.1023
Tailings Dam Breach Outflow Modelling: A Review
Uthra Sreekumar, Hossein Kheirkhah Gildeh, Abdolmajid Mohammadian, Colin Rennie and Ioan NistorMine Water and the Environment 43 (4) 563 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-024-01015-y
Efficient Alternative Finite Difference WENO Schemes for Hyperbolic Systems with Non-conservative Products
Dinshaw S. Balsara, Deepak Bhoriya, Chi-Wang Shu and Harish KumarCommunications on Applied Mathematics and Computation (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42967-024-00374-1
Particle-size segregation in self-channelized granular flows
A.N. Edwards, F.M. Rocha, B.P. Kokelaar, C.G. Johnson and J.M.N.T. GrayJournal of Fluid Mechanics 955 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2022.1089
A central-upwind scheme for two-phase shallow granular flow model
Hossam A. Nabwey, Shahid Mehmood, Saqib Zia, Asad Rehman, Muhammad Ashraf and A.M. RashadAlexandria Engineering Journal 82 291 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.09.079
Implicit and semi-implicit well-balanced finite-volume methods for systems of balance laws
I. Gómez-Bueno, S. Boscarino, M.J. Castro, C. Parés and G. RussoApplied Numerical Mathematics 184 18 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnum.2022.09.016
A Depth‐Averaged Description of Submarine Avalanche Flows and Induced Surface Waves
W. Sun, X. Meng, Y. Wang, S. S. Hsiau and Z. YouJournal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 128 (4) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JF006893
Formation of dry granular fronts and watery tails in debris flows
Xiannan Meng, C.G. Johnson and J.M.N.T. GrayJournal of Fluid Mechanics 943 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2022.400
Pressure-Tight and Non-stiff Volume Penalization for Compressible Flows
Julius ReissJournal of Scientific Computing 90 (3) (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-021-01747-x
A GPU-accelerated Efficient Simulation Tool (EST) for 2D variable-density mud/debris flows over non-uniform erodible beds
S. Martínez-Aranda, J. Murillo and P. García-NavarroEngineering Geology 296 106462 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106462
A Quasi-Single-Phase Model for Debris Flows Incorporating Non-Newtonian Fluid Behavior
Chunchen Xia and Haoyong TianWater 14 (9) 1369 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3390/w14091369
An overview of debris-flow mathematical modelling
Mario Germán Trujillo-Vela, Alfonso Mariano Ramos-Cañón, Jorge Alberto Escobar-Vargas and Sergio Andrés Galindo-TorresEarth-Science Reviews 232 104135 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104135
Solving geophysical flow problems in Luxembourg: SPH constitutive review
Kennedy C Onyelowe, Evangelin Ramani Sujatha, Frank I Aneke and Ahmed M EbidCogent Engineering 9 (1) (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2022.2122158
A Predictor–corrector scheme for simulation of two-phase granular flows over a moved bed with a variable topography
Kamel Mohamed, Slah Sahmim and Mahmoud A.E. AbdelrahmanEuropean Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids 96 39 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2022.07.001
A Hydrodynamic-Based Robust Numerical Model for Debris Hazard and Risk Assessment
Yongde Kang, Jingming Hou, Yu Tong and Baoshan ShiSustainability 13 (14) 7955 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147955
Well-Balanced High-Order Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Systems of Balance Laws
Ernesto Guerrero Fernández, Cipriano Escalante and Manuel J. Castro DíazMathematics 10 (1) 15 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3390/math10010015
Asymptotic analysis of the eigenstructure of the two-layer model and a new family of criteria for evaluating the model hyperbolicity
L. Sarno, Y. Wang, Y.-C. Tai, R. Martino and A. CarravettaAdvances in Water Resources 154 103966 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.103966
A well-posed multilayer model for granular avalanches with μ(I) rheology
L. Sarno, Y.-C. Tai, Y. Wang and M. OberlackPhysics of Fluids 33 (10) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0065697
Numerical Approximation of Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws
Edwige Godlewski and Pierre-Arnaud RaviartApplied Mathematical Sciences, Numerical Approximation of Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws 118 627 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1344-3_7
A mathematical framework for modelling rock–ice avalanches
Stefania Sansone, D. Zugliani and G. RosattiJournal of Fluid Mechanics 919 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2021.348
A fifth order WENO scheme for numerical simulation of shallow granular two-phase flow model
Omar Rabbani, Saqib Zia and Asad RehmanAdvances in Mechanical Engineering 13 (9) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1177/16878140211045240
High-order well-balanced methods for systems of balance laws: a control-based approach
Irene Gómez-Bueno, Manuel J. Castro and Carlos ParésApplied Mathematics and Computation 394 125820 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2020.125820
Collocation Methods for High-Order Well-Balanced Methods for Systems of Balance Laws
Irene Gómez-Bueno, Manuel Jesús Castro Díaz, Carlos Parés and Giovanni RussoMathematics 9 (15) 1799 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3390/math9151799
Geometrically intrinsic modeling of shallow water flows
Elena Bachini and Mario PuttiESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis 54 (6) 2125 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2020031
Multilayer models for shallow two-phase debris flows with dilatancy effects
J. Garres-Díaz, F. Bouchut, E.D. Fernández-Nieto, A. Mangeney and G. Narbona-ReinaJournal of Computational Physics 419 109699 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109699
Grain‐energy release governs mobility of debris flow due to solid–liquid mass release
Zhixian Cao, Ji Li, Alistair Borthwick, Qingquan Liu and Gareth PenderEarth Surface Processes and Landforms 45 (12) 2912 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4939
Well-Balanced High-Order Finite Volume Methods for Systems of Balance Laws
Manuel J. Castro and Carlos ParésJournal of Scientific Computing 82 (2) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-020-01149-5
A simple diffuse interface approach for compressible flows around moving solids of arbitrary shape based on a reduced Baer–Nunziato model
Friedemann Kemm, Elena Gaburro, Ferdinand Thein and Michael DumbserComputers & Fluids 204 104536 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2020.104536
Re-evaluating efficiency of first-order numerical schemes for two-layer shallow water systems by considering different eigenvalue solutions
Nino KrvavicaAdvances in Water Resources 137 103508 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103508
Discontinuous Galerkin method for solving incompressible two-phase shallow granular flow model
Muhammad Rehan Saleem, Ubaid Ahmed Nisar and Shamsul QamarAdvances in Mechanical Engineering 11 (9) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814019874908
The Lituya Bay landslide-generated mega-tsunami – numerical simulation and sensitivity analysis
José Manuel González-Vida, Jorge Macías, Manuel Jesús Castro, Carlos Sánchez-Linares, Marc de la Asunción, Sergio Ortega-Acosta and Diego ArcasNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 19 (2) 369 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-369-2019
A regularization strategy for modeling mixed-sediment river morphodynamics
Víctor Chavarrías, Guglielmo Stecca, Annunziato Siviglia and Astrid BlomAdvances in Water Resources 127 291 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.04.001
Numerical simulation of mud-flows impacting structures
Massimo Greco, Cristiana Di Cristo, Michele Iervolino and Andrea VaccaJournal of Mountain Science 16 (2) 364 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-5279-5
A depth-averaged two-phase model for fluvial sediment-laden flows over erodible beds
Ji Li, Zhixian Cao, Honglu Qian, Qingquan Liu and Gareth PenderAdvances in Water Resources 129 338 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.08.014
The space–time CESE scheme for shallow water equations incorporating variable bottom topography and horizontal temperature gradients
M. Rehan Saleem, Saqib Zia, Waqas Ashraf, Ishtiaq Ali and Shamsul QamarComputers & Mathematics with Applications 75 (3) 933 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2017.10.021
A two‐phase SPH model for debris flow propagation
M. Pastor, A. Yague, M.M. Stickle, D. Manzanal and P. MiraInternational Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 42 (3) 418 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2748
Advances in Hydroinformatics
Ilaria Fent, Sylvie Van Emelen and Sandra Soares-FrazãoSpringer Water, Advances in Hydroinformatics 1133 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7218-5_78
A quasi single-phase model for debris flows and its comparison with a two-phase model
Chun-chen Xia, Ji Li, Zhi-xian Cao, Qing-quan Liu and Kai-heng HuJournal of Mountain Science 15 (5) 1071 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-4886-5
Analytical implementation of Roe solver for two-layer shallow water equations with accurate treatment for loss of hyperbolicity
Nino Krvavica, Miran Tuhtan and Gordan JelenićAdvances in Water Resources 122 187 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.10.017
Stabilizing local boundary conditions for two-dimensional shallow water equations
Ben Mansour Dia and Jesper OppelstrupAdvances in Mechanical Engineering 10 (3) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814017726953
A depth‐averaged two‐phase model for debris flows over erodible beds
Ji Li, Zhixian Cao, Kaiheng Hu, Gareth Pender and Qingquan LiuEarth Surface Processes and Landforms 43 (4) 817 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4283
A depth-averaged two-phase model for debris flows over fixed beds
Ji Li, Zhixian Cao, Kaiheng Hu, Gareth Pender and Qingquan LiuInternational Journal of Sediment Research 33 (4) 462 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2017.06.003
Granular flows in a rotating drum and on an inclined plane: Analytical and numerical solutions
Xiannan Meng, Yongqi Wang, Feng Feng, Chun Wang and Yunlai ZhouPhysics of Fluids 30 (10) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5045308
A discrete Boltzmann equation model for two-phase shallow granular flows
Michele La Rocca, Andrea Montessori, Pietro Prestininzi and Lakshmanan ElangoComputers & Mathematics with Applications 75 (8) 2814 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2018.01.010
A two-layer model for the intrusion of two-phase debris flow into a river
Wei Liu and Siming HeQuarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology 51 (1) 113 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2017-071
A well-balanced path conservative SPH scheme for nonconservative hyperbolic systems with applications to shallow water and multi-phase flows
Giulia Rossi, Michael Dumbser and Aronne ArmaniniComputers & Fluids 154 102 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.05.034
Non-Hydrostatic Free Surface Flows
Oscar Castro-Orgaz and Willi H. HagerAdvances in Geophysical and Environmental Mechanics and Mathematics, Non-Hydrostatic Free Surface Flows 563 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47971-2_6
A new solver for granular avalanche simulation: Indoor experiment verification and field scale case study
XiaoLiang Wang and JiaChun LiScience China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 60 (12) (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-017-9093-y
Granular and particle-laden flows: from laboratory experiments to field observations
R Delannay, A Valance, A Mangeney, O Roche and P RichardJournal of Physics D: Applied Physics 50 (5) 053001 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/50/5/053001
Numerical simulation of the 30–45 ka debris avalanche flow of Montagne Pelée volcano, Martinique: from volcano flank collapse to submarine emplacement
Morgane Brunet, Laurent Moretti, Anne Le Friant, et al.Natural Hazards 87 (2) 1189 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2815-5
Shallow Water Hydro-Sediment-Morphodynamic Equations for Fluvial Processes
Zhixian Cao, Chunchen Xia, Gareth Pender and Qingquan LiuJournal of Hydraulic Engineering 143 (5) (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001281
Handbook of Numerical Methods for Hyperbolic Problems - Applied and Modern Issues
M.J. Castro, T. Morales de Luna and C. ParésHandbook of Numerical Analysis, Handbook of Numerical Methods for Hyperbolic Problems - Applied and Modern Issues 18 131 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hna.2016.10.002
Two‐dimensional Dynamics Simulation of Two‐phase Debris Flow
Wei LIU, Siming HE and Chaojun OUYANGActa Geologica Sinica - English Edition 91 (5) 1873 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-6724.13416
Finite Volumes for Complex Applications VIII - Methods and Theoretical Aspects
E. D. Fernández-NietoSpringer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, Finite Volumes for Complex Applications VIII - Methods and Theoretical Aspects 199 15 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57397-7_2
A space–time CESE scheme for shallow water magnetohydrodynamics equations with variable bottom topography
M. Rehan Saleem, Saqib Zia and Shamsul QamarJournal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 39 (5) 1563 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-016-0678-4
A Numerical Model for the Analysis of Rapid Landslide Motion
Teuku Faisal Fathani, Djoko Legono and Dwikorita KarnawatiGeotechnical and Geological Engineering 35 (5) 2253 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0241-9
Some considerations on numerical schemes for treating hyperbolicity issues in two-layer models
L. Sarno, A. Carravetta, R. Martino, M.N. Papa and Y.-C. TaiAdvances in Water Resources 100 183 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.12.014
Effects of coarse grain size distribution and fine particle content on pore fluid pressure and shear behavior in experimental debris flows
Roland Kaitna, Marisa C. Palucis, Bereket Yohannes, Kimberly M. Hill and William E. DietrichJournal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 121 (2) 415 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JF003725
Two-Dimensional Two-Phase Depth-Integrated Model for Transients over Mobile Bed
Cristiana Di Cristo, Massimo Greco, Michele Iervolino, Angelo Leopardi and Andrea VaccaJournal of Hydraulic Engineering 142 (2) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001024
Modelling and numerical simulation of two-phase debris flows
Xiannan Meng and Yongqi WangActa Geotechnica 11 (5) 1027 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-015-0418-4
A two-phase two-layer model for fluidized granular flows with dilatancy effects
François Bouchut, Enrique D. Fernández-Nieto, Anne Mangeney and Gladys Narbona-ReinaJournal of Fluid Mechanics 801 166 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2016.417
Adaptation of f-wave finite volume methods to the Boonkasame–Milewski non-Boussinesq two-layer shallow interfacial sloshing equations coupled to the vessel motion
Hamid Alemi ArdakaniEuropean Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids 60 33 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2016.04.012
On weak solutions to the 2D Savage–Hutter model of the motion of a gravity-driven avalanche flow
Eduard Feireisl, Piotr Gwiazda and Agnieszka Świerczewska-GwiazdaCommunications in Partial Differential Equations 41 (5) 759 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1080/03605302.2015.1127968
Solving two-phase shallow granular flow equations with a well-balanced NOC scheme on multiple GPUs
Jian Zhai, Wei Liu and Li YuanComputers & Fluids 134-135 90 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.04.032
Coupled Model of Two‐phase Debris Flow, Sediment Transport and Morphological Evolution
Siming HE, Chaojun OUYANG, Wei LIU and Dongpo WANGActa Geologica Sinica - English Edition 90 (6) 2206 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-6724.13031
A new efficient formulation of the HLLEM Riemann solver for general conservative and non-conservative hyperbolic systems
Michael Dumbser and Dinshaw S. BalsaraJournal of Computational Physics 304 275 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2015.10.014
TITAN2F: a pseudo-3-D model of 2-phase debris flows
G. Córdoba, M. F. Sheridan and E. B. PitmanNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussions 3 (6) 3789 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhessd-3-3789-2015
A Physics-Based Emulator for the Simulation of Geophysical Mass Flows
Asif Mahmood, Robert L. Wolpert and E. Bruce PitmanSIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification 3 (1) 562 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1137/130909445
Weak-strong uniqueness for measure-valued solutions of some compressible fluid models
Piotr Gwiazda, Agnieszka Świerczewska-Gwiazda and Emil WiedemannNonlinearity 28 (11) 3873 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/28/11/3873
Numerical modeling of the Mount Meager landslide constrained by its force history derived from seismic data
L. Moretti, K. Allstadt, A. Mangeney, Y. Capdeville, E. Stutzmann and F. BouchutJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 120 (4) 2579 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011426
Nonhydrostatic granular flow over 3-D terrain: New Boussinesq-type gravity waves?
Oscar Castro-Orgaz, Kolumban Hutter, Juan V. Giraldez and Willi H. HagerJournal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 120 (1) 1 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JF003279
Recent Advances in Modeling Landslides and Debris Flows
Xiannan Meng and Yongqi WangSpringer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering, Recent Advances in Modeling Landslides and Debris Flows 119 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11053-0_11
A two-phase shallow debris flow model with energy balance
F. Bouchut, E.D. Fernández-Nieto, A. Mangeney and G. Narbona-ReinaESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis 49 (1) 101 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2014026
A two-phase model for numerical simulation of debris flows
S. He, W. Liu, C. Ouyang and X. LiNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussions 2 (3) 2151 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhessd-2-2151-2014
Novel Numerical Approach for 1D Variable Density Shallow Flows over Uneven Rigid and Erodible Beds
Luca Cozzolino, Luigi Cimorelli, Carmine Covelli, Renata Della Morte and Domenico PianeseJournal of Hydraulic Engineering 140 (3) 254 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000821
Advances in Numerical Simulation in Physics and Engineering
Enrique D. Fernández-Nieto and Paul VigneauxSEMA SIMAI Springer Series, Advances in Numerical Simulation in Physics and Engineering 3 51 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02839-2_2
Application of a SPH depth-integrated model to landslide run-out analysis
M. Pastor, T. Blanc, B. Haddad, et al.Landslides 11 (5) 793 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0484-y
An exponential time-differencing method for monotonic relaxation systems
Peder Aursand, Steinar Evje, Tore Flåtten, Knut Erik Teigen Giljarhus and Svend Tollak MunkejordApplied Numerical Mathematics 80 1 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnum.2014.01.003
The space–time CE/SE method for solving single and two-phase shallow flow models
Shamsul Qamar, Saqib Zia and Waqas AshrafComputers & Fluids 96 136 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.03.015
A kinetic flux-vector splitting method for single-phase and two-phase shallow flows
Saqib Zia and Shamsul QamarComputers & Mathematics with Applications 67 (6) 1271 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2014.01.015
A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy. I. Physical basis
Richard M. Iverson and David L. GeorgeProceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 470 (2170) 20130819 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2013.0819
A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy. II. Numerical predictions and experimental tests
David L. George and Richard M. IversonProceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 470 (2170) 20130820 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2013.0820
Exponential stability of shallow water equations with arbitrary time dependent action
Ben Mansour DiaInternational Journal of Dynamics and Control 2 (3) 247 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-014-0056-y
Simulation of Initiation, Transport, and Deposition of Granular Avalanches: Current Progress and Future Challenges
Roger P. DenlingerProcedia IUTAM 10 363 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.piutam.2014.01.031
High‐resolution bathymetry reveals contrasting landslide activity shaping the walls of the Mid‐Atlantic Ridge axial valley
Mathilde Cannat, Anne Mangeney, Hélène Ondréas, Yves Fouquet and Alain NormandGeochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 14 (4) 996 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1002/ggge.20056
A two-phase model for dry density-varying granular flows
L.T. Sheng, Y.C. Tai, C.Y. Kuo and S.S. HsiauAdvanced Powder Technology 24 (1) 132 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2012.04.001
Two-dimensional simulation of debris flows over mobile bed: Enhancing the TRENT2D model by using a well-balanced Generalized Roe-type solver
Giorgio Rosatti and Lorenzo BegnudelliComputers & Fluids 71 179 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.10.006
Computational Challenges in the Geosciences
D. L. GeorgeThe IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications, Computational Challenges in the Geosciences 156 25 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7434-0_2
Shallow two-component gravity-driven flows with vertical variation
Julia Kowalski and Jim N. McElwaineJournal of Fluid Mechanics 714 434 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2012.489
Two phase simulations of glacier lake outburst flows
E. Bruce Pitman, Abani K. Patra, Dinesh Kumar, Kouichi Nishimura and Jiro KomoriJournal of Computational Science 4 (1-2) 71 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2012.04.007
A closure-independent Generalized Roe solver for free-surface, two-phase flows over mobile bed
Giorgio Rosatti and Lorenzo BegnudelliJournal of Computational Physics 255 362 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2013.08.020