EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 47 / No 6 (November-December 2013) ESAIM: M2AN, 47 6 (2013) 1797-1820 References
Free Access
Issue
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 47, Number 6, November-December 2013
Page(s) 1797 - 1820
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2013089
Published online 07 October 2013
  1. Y. Achdou, C. Bernardi and F. Coquel, A priori and a posteriori analysis of finite volume discretizations of Darcy’s equations. Numer. Math. 96 (2003) 17–42. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Azaïez, F. Ben Belgacem and C. Bernardi, The mortar spectral element method in domains of operators, Part I: The divergence operator and Darcy’s equations. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 26 (2006) 131–154. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Azaïez, F. Ben Belgacem, C. Bernardi and N. Chorfi, Spectral discretization of Darcy’s equations with pressure dependent porosity. Appl. Math. Comput. 217 (2010) 1838–1856. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Azaïez, F. Ben Belgacem, M. Grundmann and H. Khallouf, Staggered grids hybrid-dual spectral element method for second-order elliptic problems, Application to high-order time splitting methods for Navier–Stokes equations. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 166 (1998) 183–199. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Bernardi, Indicateurs d’erreur en h − N version des éléments spectraux. Modél. Math. et Anal. Numér. 30 (1996) 1–38. [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Bernardi, A. Blouza, N. Chorfi and N. Kharrat, A penalty algorithm for the spectral element discretization of the Stokes problem. Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 45 (2011) 201–216. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Bernardi, T. Chacón Rebollo, F. Hecht and R. Lewandowski, Automatic insertion of a turbulence model in the finite element discretization of the Navier–Stokes equations. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 19 (2009) 1139–1183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Bernardi, F. Coquel and P.-A. Raviart, Automatic coupling and finite element discretization of the Navier–Stokes and heat equations, Internal Report R10001, Labotatoire Jacques-Louis Lions, Paris (2010). [Google Scholar]
  9. C. Bernardi, M. Dauge and Y. Maday, Polynomials in Sobolev Spaces and Application to the Mortar Spectral Element Method, in preparation. [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Bernardi and Y. Maday, Spectral Methods, in the Handbook of Numerical Analysis V, edited by P.G. Ciarlet and J.-L. Lions. North-Holland (1997) 209–485. [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Bernardi, Y. Maday and F. Rapetti, Discrétisations variationnelles de problèmes aux limites elliptiques, Collection Mathématiques et Applications vol. 45. Springer-Verlag (2004). [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Braack and A. Ern, A posteriori control of modeling errors and discretization errors. Multiscale Model. Simul. 1 (2003) 221–238. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Brezis and P. Mironescu, Gagliardo–Nirenberg, composition and products in fractional Sobolev spaces, J. Evol. Equ. 1 (2001), 387–404. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  14. F. Brezzi, J. Rappaz and P.-A. Raviart, Finite dimensional approximation of nonlinear problems, Part I: Branches of nonsingular solutions. Numer. Math. 36 (1980) 1–25. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  15. T. Chacón Rebollo, S. Del Pino and D. Yakoubi, An iterative procedure to solve a coupled two-fluids turbulence model. Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 44 (2010) 693–713. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  16. A.L. Chaillou and M. Suri, Computable error estimators for the approximation of nonlinear problems by linearized models. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 196 (2006) 210–224. [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Daadaa, Discrétisation spectrale et par éléments spectraux des équations de Darcy, Ph.D. Thesis, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris (2009). [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Dauge, Neumann and mixed problems on curvilinear polyhedra. Integr. Equ. Oper. Th. 15 (1992) 227–261. [Google Scholar]
  19. L. El Alaoui, A. Ern and M. Vohralík, Guaranteed and robust a posteriori error estimates and balancing discretization and linearization errors for monotone nonlinear problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 200 (2011) 2782–2795. [Google Scholar]
  20. V. Girault and P.-A. Raviart, Finite Element Methods for Navier–Stokes Equations, Theory and Algorithms. Springer–Verlag (1986). [Google Scholar]
  21. J.-L. Lions and E. Magenes, Problèmes aux limites non homogènes et applications, Vol. I. Dunod, Paris (1968). [Google Scholar]
  22. N.G. Meyers, An Lp-estimate for the gradient of solutions of second order elliptic divergence equations. Ann. Sc. Norm. Sup. Pisa 17 (1963) 189–206. [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Pousin and J. Rappaz, Consistency, stability, a priori and a posteriori errors for Petrov-Galerkin methods applied to nonlinear problems. Numer. Math. 69 (1994) 213–231. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  24. K.R. Rajagopal, On a hierarchy of approximate models for flows of incompressible fluids through porous solid. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 17 (2007) 215–252. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  25. G. Talenti, Best constant in Sobolev inequality. Ann. Math. Pura ed Appl. Serie IV 110 (1976) 353–372. [Google Scholar]
  26. R. Verfürth, A Review of A Posteriori Error Estimation and Adaptive Mesh-Refinement Techniques. Wiley ans Teubner (1996). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you