EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 56 / No 1 (January-February 2022) ESAIM: M2AN, 56 1 (2022) 41-78 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 56, Number 1, January-February 2022
Page(s) 41 - 78
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2021085
Published online 07 February 2022
  1. S. Agmon, Lectures on Elliptic Boundary Value Problems. Providence, RI: AMS Chelsea Publishing (2010) [Google Scholar]
  2. G.A. Baker, Finite element methods for elliptic equations using nonconforming elements. Math. Comp. 31, (1977) 45–59 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  3. H. Blum and R. Rannacher, On the boundary value problem of the biharmonic operator on domains with angular corners. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2, (1980) 556–581 [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Braess, Finite Elements, Theory, Fast Solvers, and Applications in Elasticity Theory, 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. S.C. Brenner, Convergence of nonconforming multigrid methods without full elliptic regularity. Math. Comp. 68, (1999) 25–53 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  6. S.C. Brenner and L.-Y. Sung, C0 interior penalty methods for fourth order elliptic boundary value problems on polygonal domains. J. Sci. Comput. 22, (2005) 83–118 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. S.C. Brenner, T. Gudi and L.-Y. Sung, A weakly over-penalized symmetric interior penalty method for the biharmonic problem. Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal. 37, (2010) 214–238 [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  8. S.C. Brenner, L.-Y. Sung, H. Zhang and Y. Zhang, A Morley finite element method for the displacement obstacle problem of clamped Kirchhoff plates. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 254, (2013) 31–42 [Google Scholar]
  9. C. Carstensen, A unifying theory of a posteriori finite element error control. Numer. Math. 100, (2005) 617–637 [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Carstensen and D. Gallistl, Guaranteed lower eigenvalue bounds for the biharmonic equation. Numer. Math. 126, (2014) 33–51 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Carstensen and F. Hellwig, Constants in discrete Poincaré and Friedrichs inequalities and discrete quasi-interpolation. CMAM 18, (2017) 433–450 [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Carstensen and J. Hu, A unifying theory of a posteriori error control for nonconforming finite element methods. Numer. Math. 107, (2007) 473–502 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Carstensen and C. Merdon, Computational survey on a posteriori error estimators for nonconforming finite element methods for the Poisson problem. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 249, (2013) 74–94 [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Carstensen and N. Nataraj, Adaptive Morley FEM for the von Kármán equations with optimal convergence rates. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 59, (2021) 696–719 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Carstensen and N. Nataraj, Mathematics and computation of plates. Under preparation (2021) [Google Scholar]
  16. C. Carstensen and N. Nataraj, A priori and a posteriori error analysis of the Crouzeix-Raviart and Morley FEM with original and modified right-hand sides. Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 21, (2021) 289–315 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  17. C. Carstensen and S. Puttkammer, How to prove the discrete reliability for nonconforming finite element methods. J. Comput. Math. 38, (2020) 142–175 [Google Scholar]
  18. C. Carstensen and S. Puttkammer, Direct guaranteed lower eigenvalue bounds with optimal a priori convergence rates for the bi-Laplacian. Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.01505 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  19. C. Carstensen and H. Rabus, Axioms of adaptivity with separate marking for data resolution. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 55, (2017) 2644–2665 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  20. C. Carstensen, M. Eigel, R.H.W. Hoppe and C. Löbhard, A review of unified a posteriori finite element error control. Numer. Math. Theory Methods Appl. 5, (2012) 509–558 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  21. C. Carstensen, J. Gedicke and D. Rim, Explicit error estimates for Courant, Crouzeix-Raviart and Raviart-Thomas finite element methods. J. Comput. Math. 30, (2012) 337–353 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  22. C. Carstensen, D. Gallistl and J. Hu, A discrete Helmholtz decomposition with Morley finite element functions and the optimality of adaptive finite element schemes. Comput. Math. Appl. 68, (2014) 2167–2181 [Google Scholar]
  23. C. Carstensen, D. Gallistl and N. Nataraj, Comparison results of nonstandard P2 finite element methods for the biharmonic problem. ESAIM: M2AN 49, (2015) 977–990 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  24. C. Carstensen, G. Mallik and N. Nataraj, A priori and a posteriori error control of discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods for the von Kármán equations. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 39, (2019) 167–200 [Google Scholar]
  25. C. Carstensen, N. Nataraj, C.R. Gopikrishnan and S. Devika, Unifying a priori and a posteriori error analysis for the lowest-order FEMs in fourth-order semi-linear problems with trilinear nonlinearity. Under preparation, (2021) [Google Scholar]
  26. P.G. Ciarlet, The Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems. Amsterdam: North-Holland (1978) [Google Scholar]
  27. G. Engel, K. Garikipati, T.J.R. Hughes, M.G. Larson, L. Mazzei and R.L. Taylor, Continuous/discontinuous finite element approximations of fourth-order elliptic problems in structural and continuum mechanics with applications to thin beams and plates, and strain gradient elasticity. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 191, (2002) 3669–3750 [Google Scholar]
  28. X. Feng and O.A. Karakashian, Fully discrete dynamic mesh discontinuous Galerkin methods for the Cahn-Hilliard equation of phase transition. Math. Comp. 76, (2007) 1093–1117 (electronic) [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  29. D. Gallistl, Morley finite element method for the eigenvalues of the biharmonic operator. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 35, (2015) 1779–1811 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  30. E.H. Georgoulis and P. Houston, Discontinuous Galerkin methods for the biharmonic problem. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 29, (2009) 573–594 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  31. E.H. Georgoulis, P. Houston and J. Virtanen, An a posteriori error indicator for discontinuous Galerkin approximations of fourth-order elliptic problems. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 31, (2011) 281–298 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  32. D. Gilbarg and N.S. Trudinger, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order. Classics in Mathematics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag (2001). Reprint of the 1998 edition [Google Scholar]
  33. P. Grisvard, Singularities in Boundary Value Problems, Vol. RMA 22. Masson& Springer-Verlag (1992) [Google Scholar]
  34. T. Gudi, A new error analysis for discontinuous finite element methods for linear elliptic problems. Math. Comp. 79, (2010) 2169–2189 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  35. J.-L. Lions, E. Magenes, Non-homogeneous Boundary Value Problems and Applications. Vol. I. Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg (1972). Translated from the French by P. Kenneth, Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 181. (1972), 181 [Google Scholar]
  36. I. Mozolevski and E. Süli, A priori error analysis for the hp-version of the discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for the biharmonic equation. Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 3, (2003) 596–607 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  37. I. Mozolevski, E. Süli and P.R. Bösing, hp-version a priori error analysis of interior penalty discontinuous Galerkin finite element approximations to the biharmonic equation. J. Sci. Comput. 30, (2007) 465–491 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  38. J. Nečas, Les méthodes directes en théorie des équations elliptiques. Masson et Cie, Éditeurs: Paris; Academia, Éditeurs, Prague (1967) [Google Scholar]
  39. E. Süli and I. Mozolevski, hp-version interior penalty DGFEMs for the biharmonic equation. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 196, (2007) 1851–1863 [Google Scholar]
  40. L. Tartar, An Introduction to Sobolev Spaces and Interpolation Spaces. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer (2010) [Google Scholar]
  41. A. Veeser and P. Zanotti, Quasi-optimal nonconforming methods for symmetric elliptic problems. I - Abstract theory. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 56, (2018) 1621–1642 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  42. A. Veeser and P. Zanotti, Quasi-optimal nonconforming methods for symmetric elliptic problems. III - Discontinuous Galerkin and other interior penalty methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 56, (2018) 2871–2894 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  43. A. Veeser and P. Zanotti, Quasi-optimal nonconforming methods for symmetric elliptic problems. II - Overconsistency and classical nonconforming elements. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 57, (2019) 266–292 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  44. R. Verfürth, A Posteriori Error Estimation Techniques for Finite Element Methods. Oxford: Numerical Mathematics and Scientific Computation. Oxford University Press (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you