EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 56 / No 2 (March-April 2022) ESAIM: M2AN, 56 2 (2022) 617-650 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 56, Number 2, March-April 2022
Page(s) 617 - 650
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2022013
Published online 08 March 2022
  1. P. Benner, D. Kressner and V. Mehrmann, Skew-Hamiltonian and Hamiltonian eigenvalue problems: theory, algorithms and applications. Springer, Dordrecht (2005) 3–39. [Google Scholar]
  2. N. Cagniart, Y. Maday and B. Stamm, Model order reduction for problems with large convection effects. In: Contributions to partial differential equations and applications. Vol. 47 of Comput. Methods Appl. Sci. Springer, Cham (2019) 131–150. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. J.G. Caputo, N.K. Efremidis and C. Hang, Fourier-mode dynamics for the nonlinear schrödinger equation in one-dimensional bounded domains. Phys. Rev. E 84 (2011) 036601. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. K. Carlberg, Adaptive h-refinement for reduced-order models, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 102 (2015) 1192–1210. [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Celledoni and B. Owren, A class of intrinsic schemes for orthogonal integration. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 40 (2002) 2069–2084. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Chaturantabut and D.C. Sorensen, Nonlinear model reduction via discrete empirical interpolation. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 32 (2010) 2737–2764. [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Cheng, T.Y. Hou and Z. Zhang, A dynamically bi-orthogonal method for time-dependent stochastic partial differential equations II: adaptivity and generalizations. J. Comput. Phys. 242 (2013) 753–776. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Couplet, P. Sagaut and C. Basdevant, Intermodal energy transfers in a proper orthogonal decomposition–Galerkin representation of a turbulent separated flow. J. Fluid Mech. 491 (2003) 275–284. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  9. V. Ehrlacher, D. Lombardi, O. Mula and F.-X. Vialard, Nonlinear model reduction on metric spaces. application to one-dimensional conservative PDEs in Wasserstein spaces. ESAIM: M2AN 54 (2020) 2159–2197. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  10. F. Feppon and P.F.J. Lermusiaux, A geometric approach to dynamical model order reduction. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 39 (2018) 510–538. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Frénod, F. Salvarani and E. Sonnendrücker, Long time simulation of a beam in a periodic focusing channel via a two-scale pic-method. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 19 (2009) 175–197. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  12. A. George and J.W. Liu, Computer Solution of Large Sparse Positive Definite Systems. Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference (1981). [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Giraud and J. Langou, A robust criterion for the modified Gram-Schmidt algorithm with selective reorthogonalization. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 25 (2003) 417–441. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  14. W. Givens, Computation of plane unitary rotations transforming a general matrix to triangular form. J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 6 (1958) 26–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M.A. Grepl and A.T. Patera, A posteriori error bounds for reduced-basis approximations of parametrized parabolic partial differential equations. ESAIM: M2AN 39 (2005) 157–181. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  16. T.H. Gronwall, Note on the derivatives with respect to a parameter of the solutions of a system of differential equations. Ann. Math. 20 (1919) 292–296. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  17. E. Hairer, C. Lubich and G. Wanner, Structure-preserving algorithms for ordinary differential equations. In: Geometric Numerical Integration, 2nd edition. Vol. 31 of Springer Series in Computational Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2006). [Google Scholar]
  18. E. Hairer, S.P. Nørsett and G. Wanner, Solving Ordinary Differential Equations I. Nonstiff Problems, 2nd edition. Vol. 8 of Springer Series in Computational Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1993). [Google Scholar]
  19. S.A. Hirstoaga, Design and performant implementation of numerical methods for multiscale problems in plasma physics. Habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université de Strasbourg, IRMA UMR 7501 (April , 2019). [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Iollo and D. Lombardi, Advection modes by optimal mass transfer, Phys. Rev. E 89 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. O. Koch and C. Lubich, Dynamical low-rank approximation. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 29 (2007) 434–454. [Google Scholar]
  22. K. Lee and K.T. Carlberg, Model reduction of dynamical systems on nonlinear manifolds using deep convolutional autoencoders. J. Comput. Phys. 404 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Meyer and H.G. Matthies, Efficient model reduction in non-linear dynamics using the karhunen-loève expansion and dual-weighted-residual methods. Comput. Mech. 31 (2003) 179–191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. E. Musharbash and F. Nobile, Symplectic dynamical low rank approximation of wave equations with random parameters. Technical Report 18.2017, EPFL, Switzerland (2017). [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Ohlberger and S. Rave, Nonlinear reduced basis approximation of parameterized evolution equations via the method of freezing. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 351 (2013) 901–906. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  26. C. Pagliantini, Dynamical reduced basis methods for Hamiltonian systems. Numer. Math. 148 (2021) 409–448. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  27. C. Paige and C. Van Loan, A Schur decomposition for Hamiltonian matrices. Linear Algebra Appl. 41 (1981) 11–32. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  28. B. Peherstorfer and K. Willcox, Online adaptive model reduction for nonlinear systems via low-rank updates. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 37 (2015) A2123–A2150. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. L. Peng and K. Mohseni, Symplectic model reduction of Hamiltonian systems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 38 (2016) A1–A27. [Google Scholar]
  30. A. Quarteroni, A. Manzoni and F. Negri, Reduced Basis Methods for Partial Differential Equations: An Introduction. Vol. 92 of Unitext. Springer, Cham (2016) La Matematica per il 3+2. [Google Scholar]
  31. J. Reiss, P. Schulze, J. Sesterhenn and V. Mehrmann, The shifted proper orthogonal decomposition: a mode decomposition for multiple transport phenomena. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 40 (2018) A1322–A1344. [Google Scholar]
  32. D. Rim, B. Peherstorfer and K.T. Mandli, Manifold approximations via transported subspaces: model reduction for transport-dominated problems. Preprint arXiv:1912.13024 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Salam, On theoretical and numerical aspects of symplectic Gram–Schmidt-like algorithms. Numer. Algorithms 39 (2005) 437–462. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  34. T.P. Sapsis and P.F.J. Lermusiaux, Dynamical criteria for the evolution of the stochastic dimensionality in flows with uncertainty. Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenomena 241 (2012) 60–76. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  35. A. Spantini, Preconditioning techniques for stochastic partial differential equations. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2013). [Google Scholar]
  36. R. Ştefănescu, A. Sandu and I.M. Navon, Comparison of pod reduced order strategies for the nonlinear 2d shallow water equations. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 76 (2014) 497–521. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. S. Sultana and Z. Rahman, Hamiltonian formulation for water wave equation. Open J. Fluid Dyn. 03 (2013) 75–81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. T. Taddei, A registration method for model order reduction: data compression and geometry reduction. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 42 (2020) A997–A1027. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. K. Urban and A. Patera, An improved error bound for reduced basis approximation of linear parabolic problems. Math. Comput. 83 (2014) 1599–1615. [Google Scholar]
  40. C.F. Van Loan, A symplectic method for approximating all the eigenvalues of a Hamiltonian matrix. Linear Algebra Appl. 61 (1984) 233–251. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  41. G. Welper, Interpolation of functions with parameter dependent jumps by transformed snapshots. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 39 (2017) A1225–A1250. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you