EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 59 / No 5 (September-October 2025) ESAIM: M2AN, 59 5 (2025) 2447-2490 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 59, Number 5, September-October 2025
Page(s) 2447 - 2490
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2025056
Published online 17 September 2025
  1. P. Amodio and L. Brugnano, The conditioning of Toeplitz band matrices. Math. Comput. Modell. 23 (1996) 29–42. [Google Scholar]
  2. L. Bales and I. Lasiecka, Continuous finite elements in space and time for the nonhomogeneous wave equation. Comput. Math. Appl. 27 (1994) 91–102. [Google Scholar]
  3. L. Banjai, E.H. Georgoulis and O. Lijoka, A Trefftz polynomial space–time discontinuous Galerkin method for the second order wave equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 55 (2017) 63–86. [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Bansal, A. Moiola, I. Perugia and C. Schwab, Space–time discontinuous Galerkin approximation of acoustic waves with point singularities. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 41 (2021) 2056–2109. [Google Scholar]
  5. H. Barucq, H. Calandra, J. Diaz and E. Shishenina, Space–time Trefftz-DG approximation for elasto-acoustics. Appl. Anal. 99 (2020) 747–760. [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Bignardi and A. Moiola, A space–time continuous and coercive formulation for the wave equation. arXiv:2312.07268 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  7. B.D. Bojanov, H. Hakopian and B. Sahakian, Spline Functions and Multivariate Interpolations. Mathematics and its Applications. Springer (1993). [Google Scholar]
  8. H. Brezis, Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations. Universitext, Springer New York (2010). [Google Scholar]
  9. C.K. Chui, An Introduction to Wavelets. Vol. 1 of Wavelet Analysis and its Applications. Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA (1992). [Google Scholar]
  10. N. Collier, D. Pardo, L. Dalcin, M. Paszynski and V.M. Calo, The cost of continuity: a study of the performance of isogeometric finite elements using direct solvers. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 213/216 (2012) 353–361. [Google Scholar]
  11. C. de Boor, On calculating with B-splines. J. Approximation Theory 6 (1972) 50–62. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  12. C. de Falco, A. Reali and R. Vásquez, GeoPDEs: a research tool for isogeometric analysis of PDEs. Adv. Eng. Softw. 42 (2011) 1020–1034. [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Donatelli, C. Garoni, C. Manni, S. Serra-Capizzano and H. Speleers, Symbol-based multigrid methods for Galerkin B-spline isogeometric analysis. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 55 (2017) 31–62. [Google Scholar]
  14. W. Dörfler, S. Findeisen and C. Wieners, Space–time discontinuous Galerkin discretizations for linear first-order hyperbolic evolution systems. Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 16 (2016) 409–428. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  15. S.-E. Ekström, I. Furci, C. Garoni, C. Manni, S. Serra-Capizzano and H. Speleers, Are the eigenvalues of the B-spline isogeometric analysis approximation of −Δu = λu known in almost closed form? Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 25 (2018) e2198. [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Ferrari, Some properties of symbols associated with maximal regularity splines. In preparation (2025). [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Ferrari and S. Fraschini, Stability of conforming space–time isogeometric methods for the wave equation. Math. Comput. (2025). Published online 12 Feb. 2025. [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Ferrari, S. Fraschini, G. Loli, A. Moiola, I. Perugia and G. Sangalli, XTIgA-Waves. https://github.com/XTIgA-Waves/XTIgA-Waves.git (2024). [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Fraschini, G. Loli, A. Moiola and G. Sangalli, An unconditionally stable space–time isogeometric method for the acoustic wave equation. Comput. Math. Appl. 169 (2024) 205–222. [Google Scholar]
  20. D.A. French, A space-time finite element method for the wave equation. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 107 (1993) 145–157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. D.A. French and T.E. Peterson, A continuous space–time finite element method for the wave equation. Math. Comput. 65 (1996) 491–506. [Google Scholar]
  22. D.A. French and J.W. Schaeffer, Continuous finite element methods which preserve energy properties for nonlinear problems. Appl. Math. Comput. 39 (1990) 271–295. [Google Scholar]
  23. T. Führer, R. González and M. Karkulik, Well-posedness of first-order acoustic wave equations and space-time finite element approximation. IMA J. Numer. Anal. (2025) drae104. [Google Scholar]
  24. C. Garoni, C. Manni, F. Pelosi, S. Serra-Capizzano and H. Speleers, On the spectrum of stiffness matrices arising from isogeometric analysis. Numer. Math. 127 (2014) 751–799. [Google Scholar]
  25. C. Garoni, H. Speleers, S.-E. Ekström, A. Reali, S. Serra-Capizzano and T.J.R. Hughes, Symbol-based analysis of finite element and isogeometric B-spline discretizations of eigenvalue problems: exposition and review. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 26 (2019) 1639–1690. [Google Scholar]
  26. J. Henning, D. Palitta, V. Simoncini and K. Urban, An ultraweak space–time variational formulation for the wave equation: analysis and efficient numerical solution. ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 56 (2022) 1173–1198. [Google Scholar]
  27. T.J.R. Hughes and G.M. Hulbert, Space–time finite element methods for elastodynamics: formulations and error estimates. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 66 (1988) 339–363. [Google Scholar]
  28. C. Johnson, Discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods for second order hyperbolic problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 107 (1993) 117–129. [Google Scholar]
  29. V. Lakshmikantham and D. Trigiante, Theory of Difference Equations Numerical Methods and Applications. Vol. 181 of Mathematics in Science and Engineering. Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA (1988). [Google Scholar]
  30. U. Langer and M. Zank, Efficient direct space-time finite element solvers for parabolic initial-boundary value problems in anisotropic Sobolev spaces. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 43 (2021) A2714–A2736. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. R. Löscher, O. Steinbach and M. Zank, Numerical results for an unconditionally stable space–time finite element method for the wave equation, in Domain Decomposition Methods in Science and Engineering XXVI. Springer (2023) 625–632. [Google Scholar]
  32. R. Löscher, O. Steinbach and M. Zank, On a modified Hilbert transformation, the discrete inf-sup condition, and error estimates. Comput. Math. Appl. 171 (2024) 114–138. [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Moiola and I. Perugia, A space-time Trefftz discontinuous Galerkin method for the acoustic wave equation in first-order formulation. Numer. Math. 138 (2018) 389–435. [Google Scholar]
  34. P. Monk and G.R. Richter, A discontinuous Galerkin method for linear symmetric hyperbolic systems in inhomogeneous media. J. Sci. Comput. 22/23 (2005) 443–477. [Google Scholar]
  35. I. Perugia, J. Schöberl, P. Stocker and C. Wintersteiger, Tent pitching and Trefftz-DG method for the acoustic wave equation. Comput. Math. Appl. 79 (2020) 2987–3000. [Google Scholar]
  36. F. Qi, A double inequality for the ratio of two non-zero neighbouring Bernoulli numbers. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 351 (2019) 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  37. O. Steinbach and M. Zank, A stabilized space–time finite element method for the wave equation. Vol. 128 of Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Eng. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2019). [Google Scholar]
  38. O. Steinbach and M. Zank, Coercive space–time finite element methods for initial boundary value problems. Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal. 52 (2020) 154–194. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  39. M. Tani, A preconditioning strategy for linear systems arising from nonsymmetric schemes in isogeometric analysis. Comput. Math. Appl. 74 (2017) 1690–1702. [Google Scholar]
  40. M. Zank, Inf-sup Stable Space–Time Methods For Time-Dependent Partial Differential Equations. Verlag der Technischen Universit¨at Graz (2020). [Google Scholar]
  41. M. Zank, Higher-order space–time continuous Galerkin methods for the wave equation, in 14th WCCM-ECCOMAS Congress 2020, Vol. 700 (2021). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you