EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 59 / No 6 (November-December 2025) ESAIM: M2AN, 59 6 (2025) 2933-2955 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 59, Number 6, November-December 2025
Page(s) 2933 - 2955
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2025079
Published online 07 November 2025
  1. R. Anderson, A. Barker, J. Bramwell, J.-S. Camier, J. Cerveny, V. Dobrev, Y. Dudouit, A. Fisher, T. Kolev, W. Pazner, M. Stowell, V. Tomov, J. Dahm, D. Medina and S. Zampini, MFEM: a modular finite element library. Comput. Math. App. 81 (2021) 42–74. [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Andrej, N. Atallah, J.-P. B¨acker, J.-S. Camier, D. Copeland, V. Dobrev, Y. Dudoit, T, Duswald, B. Keith, D. Kim, T. Kolev, B. Lazarov, K. Mittal, W. Pazner, S. Petrides, S. Shiraiwa, M. Stowell and V. Tomov, High-performance finite elements with MFEM. Int. J. HPC App. 38 (2024) 447–467. [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Badia, E. Neiva and F. Verdugo, Linking ghost penalty and aggregated unfitted methods. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 388 (2022) 114232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. G.R. Barrenechea, V. John and P. Knobloch, Analysis of algebraic flux correction schemes. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 54 (2016) 2427–2451. [Google Scholar]
  5. G.R. Barrenechea, V. John and P. Knobloch, Monotone Discretizations for Elliptic Second Order Partial Differential Equations. Springer (2025). [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Becker and P. Hansbo, A simple pressure stabilization method for the Stokes equation. Commun. Numer. Methods Eng. 24 (2008) 1421–1430. [Google Scholar]
  7. S.P. Bordas, E.N. Burman, M.G. Larson and M.A. Olshanskii, editors, Geometrically unfitted finite element methods and applications, in Proceedings of the UCL Workshop. Vol. 121. Springer: LNCSE (2018). [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Burman, Ghost penalty. C. R. Math. 348 (2010) 1217–1220. [Google Scholar]
  9. E. Burman and A. Ern, Continuous interior penalty hp-finite element methods for advection and advection-diffusion equations. Math. Comput. 76 (2007) 1119–1140. [Google Scholar]
  10. E. Burman and P. Hansbo, Fictitious domain finite element methods using cut elements: II. A stabilized Nitsche method. Appl. Numer. Math. 62 (2012) 328–341. [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Burman, S. Claus, P. Hansbo, M.G. Larson and A. Massing, CutFEM: Discretizing geometry and partial differential equations. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 104 (2015) 472–501. [Google Scholar]
  12. E. Burman, S. Claus and A. Massing, A stabilized cut finite element method for the three field Stokes problem. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 37 (2025) A1705–A1726. [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Codina and J. Blasco, A finite element formulation for the Stokes problem allowing equal velocity–pressure interpolation. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 143 (1997) 373–391. [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Codina and J. Blasco, Analysis of a stabilized finite element approximation of the transient convection–diffusion–reaction equation using orthogonal subscales. Comput. Visual Sci. 4 (2002) 167–174. [Google Scholar]
  15. GlVis: OpenGL Finite Element Visualization Tool. https://glvis.org. [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Hansbo and A. Hansbo, An unfitted finite element method, based on Nitsche’s method, for elliptic interface problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 191 (2002) 5537–5552. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Hysing, A new implicit surface tension implementation for interfacial flows. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 51 (2006) 659–672. [Google Scholar]
  18. V. John and A. Kindl, A variational multiscale method for turbulent flow simulation with adaptive large scale space. J. Comput. Phys. 229 (2010) 301–312. [Google Scholar]
  19. V. John and P. Knobloch, On spurious oscillations at layers diminishing (SOLD) methods for convection–diffusion equations: Part I – a review. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 196 (2007) 2197–2215. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. V. John, S. Kaya and W. Layton, A two-level variational multiscale method for convection-dominated convection-diffusion equations. Comput. Methods Appl. Methods Eng. 195 (2006) 4594–4603. [Google Scholar]
  21. R.B. Kellogg, On the Poisson equation with intersecting interfaces. Appl. Anal. 4 (1974) 101–129. [Google Scholar]
  22. C. Kublik and R. Tsai, Integration over curves and surfaces defined by the closest point mapping. Res. Math. Sci. 3 (2016) 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  23. C. Kublik and R. Tsai, An extrapolative approach to integration over hypersurfaces in the level set framework. Math. Comput. 87 (2018) 2365–2392. [Google Scholar]
  24. D. Kuzmin, Algebraic flux correction I. Scalar conservation laws, in Flux-Corrected Transport, 2nd edition, edited by D. Kuzmin, R. Löhner and S. Turek. Springer (2012) 145–192. [Google Scholar]
  25. D. Kuzmin and J.-P. B¨acker, An unfitted finite element method using level set functions for extrapolation into deformable diffuse interfaces. J. Comput. Phys. 461 (2022) 111218. [Google Scholar]
  26. D. Kuzmin and H. Hajduk, Property-Preserving Numerical Schemes for Conservation Laws. World Scientific (2023). [Google Scholar]
  27. D. Kuzmin and M. Quezada de Luna, Entropy conservation property and entropy stabilization of high-order continuous Galerkin approximations to scalar conservation laws. Comput. Fluids 213 (2020) 104742. [Google Scholar]
  28. C. Lehrenfeld and M. Olshanskii, An Eulerian finite element method for PDEs in time-dependent domains. ESAIM: M2AN 53 (2019) 585–614. [Google Scholar]
  29. C. Lohmann, D. Kuzmin, J.N. Shadid and S. Mabuza, Flux-corrected transport algorithms for continuous Galerkin methods based on high order Bernstein finite elements. J. Comput. Phys. 344 (2017) 151–186. [Google Scholar]
  30. A. Massing, B. Schott and W.A. Wall, A stabilized Nitsche cut finite element method for the Oseen problem. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 328 (2018) 262–300. [Google Scholar]
  31. J. Nitsche, Über ein Variationsprinzip zur Lösung von Dirichlet-Problemen bei Verwendung von Teilr¨aumen, die keinen Randbedingungen unterworfen sind. Abh. Math. Univ. Hamburg 36 (1971) 9–15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. M. Olshanskii and H. von Wahl, Stability of instantaneous pressures in an Eulerian finite element method for moving boundary flow problems. J. Comput. Phys. 533 (2025) 113983. [Google Scholar]
  33. E.M. Stein, Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions. Princeton Mathematical Series. Vol. 30. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey (1970). [Google Scholar]
  34. J. Vedral, A. Rupp and D. Kuzmin, Strongly consistent low-dissipation WENO schemes for finite elements. Appl. Numer. Math. 210 (2025) 64–81. [Google Scholar]
  35. E. Wadbro, S. Zahedi, G. Kreiss and M. Berggren, A uniformly well-conditioned, unfitted Nitsche method for interface problems. BIT Numer. Math. 53 (2013) 791–820. [Google Scholar]
  36. A. Wathen, Realistic eigenvalue bounds for the Galerkin mass matrix. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 7 (1987) 449–457. [Google Scholar]
  37. S. Zahedi and A.K. Tornberg, Delta function approximations in level set methods by distance function extension. J. Comput. Phys. 229 (2010) 2199–2219. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you