EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 60 / No 1 (January-February 2026) ESAIM: M2AN, 60 1 (2026) 1-23 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 60, Number 1, January-February 2026
Page(s) 1 - 23
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2025091
Published online 30 January 2026
  1. Arcangeli R. and Gout J.L., Sur l'évaluation de l'erreur d'interpolation de Lagrange dans un ouvert de Rn. RAIRO Analyse numérique 10 (1976) 5–27. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aurada M., Feischl M., Kemetmüller J., Page M. and Praetorius D., Each H1/2-stable projection yields convergence and quasi-optimality of adaptive FEM with inhomogeneous Dirichlet data in Rd. ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 47 (2013) 1207–1235. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bebendorf M., A note on the Poincaré inequality for convex domains. Z. Anal. Anwendungen 22 (2003) 751–756. [Google Scholar]
  4. Brenner S.C., An optimal-order multigrid method for P1 nonconforming finite elements. Math. Comp. 52 (1989) 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  5. Carstensen C., Quasi-interpolation and a posteriori error analysis in finite element methods. ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 33 (1999) 1187–1202. [Google Scholar]
  6. Carstensen C. and Funken S.A., Constants in Clément-interpolation error and residual based a posteriori error estimates in finite element methods. East-West J. Numer. Math. 8 (2000) 153–175. [Google Scholar]
  7. Carstensen C., Gedicke J. and Rim D., Explicit error estimates for Courant, Crouzeix-Raviart and Raviart-Thomas finite element methods. J. Comput. Math. 30 (2012) 337–353. [Google Scholar]
  8. Carstensen C., Peterseim D. and Schedensack M., Comparison results of finite element methods for the Poisson model problem. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 50 (2012) 2803–2823. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chaumont-Frelet T. and Vohralík M., A stable local commuting projector and optimal hp approximation estimates in H(curl). Numer. Math. 156 (2024) 2293–2342. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ciarlet P.G., The Finite Element Method For Elliptic Problems. SIAM (2002). [Google Scholar]
  11. Clément P., Approximation by finite element functions using local regularization. ESAIM: Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 9 (1975) 77–84. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dobrzynski C., MMG3D: User guide. Tech. Report 422, Inria (2012). [Google Scholar]
  13. Dolejší V., Ern A. and Vohralík M., hp-adaptation driven by polynomial-degree-robust a posteriori error estimates for elliptic problems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 38 (2016) A3220–A3246. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ern A. and Guermond J.-L., Finite element quasi-interpolation and best approximation. ESAIM: Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 51 (2017) 1367–1385. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ern A. and Guermond J.-L., Finite Elements I. Approximation and Interpolation. Texts in Applied Mathematics. Vol. 72. Springer International Publishing, Springer Nature Switzerland AG (2021). [Google Scholar]
  16. Ern A. and Vohralík M., Polynomial-degree-robust a posteriori estimates in a unified setting for conforming, non-conforming, discontinuous Galerkin, and mixed discretizations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 53 (2015) 1058–1081. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ern A., Smears I. and Vohralík M., Discrete p-robust H(div)-liftings and a posteriori estimates for elliptic problems with H−1 source terms. Calcolo 54 (2017) 1009–1025. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ern A., Gudi T., Smears I. and Vohralík M., Equivalence of local and global-best approximations, a simple stable local commuting projector, and optimal hp approximation estimates in H(div). IMA J. Numer. Anal. 42 (2022) 1023–1049. [Google Scholar]
  19. Falk R.S. and Winther R., Local bounded cochain projections. Math. Comp. 83 (2014) 2631–2656. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gawlik E., Holst M.J. and Licht M.W., Local finite element approximation of Sobolev differential forms. ESAIM: Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 55 (2021) 2075–2099. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hao T., Guan X., Mao S. and Chen S., Computable interpolation error constants for the geometric simplex finite elements. J. Sci. Comput. 87 (2021) 21. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hiptmair R. and Pechstein C., Discrete regular decompositions of tetrahedral discrete 1-forms. In collection Maxwell's Equations, De Gruyter (2019) 199–258. [Google Scholar]
  23. Karkulik M. and Melenk J.M., Local high-order regularization and applications to hp-methods. Comput. Math. Appl. 70 (2015) 1606–1639. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kikuchi F. and Liu X., Estimation of interpolation error constants for the P0 and P1 triangular finite elements. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 196 (2007) 3750–3758. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kobayashi K., On the interpolation constants over triangular elements. App. Math. 2015 (2015) 110–124. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kobayashi K. and Tsuchiya T., A Babuška-Aziz proof of the circumradius condition. Jpn. J. Indust. Appl. Math. 31 (2014) 193–210. [Google Scholar]
  27. Licht M.W., Averaging-based local projections in finite element exterior calculus. Preprint arXiv: 2301.03007 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu X. and Kikuchi F., Analysis and estimation of error constants for P0 and P1 interpolations over triangular finite elements. J. Math. Sci. Univ. Tokyo 17 (2010) 27–78. [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu X. and You C., Explicit bound for quadratic Lagrange interpolation constant on triangular finite elements. Appl. Math. Comput. 319 (2018) 693–701. [Google Scholar]
  30. Målqvist A. and Peterseim D., Localization of elliptic multiscale problems. Math. Comp. 83 (2014) 2583–2603. [Google Scholar]
  31. Melenk J.M., hp-interpolation of nonsmooth functions and an aplication to hp-a posteriori error estimation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 43 (2005) 127–155. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nédélec J.C., Mixed finite elements in R3. Numer. Math. 35 (1980) 315–341. [Google Scholar]
  33. Oswald P., On a BPX-preconditioner for P1 elements. Computing 51 (1993) 125–133. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  34. Payne L.E. and Weinberger H.F., An optimal Poincaré inequality for convex domains. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 5 (1960) 1005–1036. [Google Scholar]
  35. Raviart P.A. and Thomas J.M., A mixed finite element method for 2nd order elliptic problems. In Mathematical Aspects of Finite Element Methods. Springer-Verlag (1977). [Google Scholar]
  36. Schöberl J., Commuting quasi-interpolation operators for mixed finite elements. Tech. Report ISC-01-10-MATH, Texas A&M University (2001). [Google Scholar]
  37. Schöberl J., Melenk J.M., Pechstein C. and Zaglmayr S., Additive Schwarz preconditioning for p-version triangular and tetrahedral finite elements. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 28 (2008) 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  38. Scott L.R. and Zhang S., Finite element interpolation of nonsmooth functions satisfying boundary conditions. Math. Comp. 54 (1990) 483–493. [Google Scholar]
  39. Veeser A., Approximating gradients with continuous piecewise polynomial functions. Found. Comput. Math. 16 (2016) 723–750. [Google Scholar]
  40. Veeser A. and Verfürth R., Explicit upper bounds for dual norms of residuals. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47 (2009) 2387–2405. [Google Scholar]
  41. Veeser A. and Verfürth R., Poincaré constants for finite element stars. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 32 (2012) 30–47. [Google Scholar]
  42. Verfürth R., Error estimates for some quasi-interpolation operators. ESAIM: Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 33 (1999) 695–713. [Google Scholar]
  43. Vohralík M., Analysis and approximation of partial differential equations by finite elements. Lecture notes, ENSTA, Institut Polytechnique de Paris (2025). [Google Scholar]
  44. Vohralík M., p-robust equivalence of global continuous and local discontinuous approximation, a p-stable local projector, and optimal elementwise hp approximation estimates in H1. HAL Preprint 04436063, submitted for publication (2025). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you