EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 60 / No 1 (January-February 2026) ESAIM: M2AN, 60 1 (2026) 25-50 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 60, Number 1, January-February 2026
Page(s) 25 - 50
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2025094
Published online 30 January 2026
  1. Ahmed E., Ali Hassan S., Japhet C., Kern M. and Vohralík M., A posteriori error estimates and stopping criteria for space-time domain decomposition for two-phase flow between different rock types. SMAI J. Comput. Math. 5 (2019) 195–227. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ainsworth M. and Oden J.T., A Posteriori Error Estimation in Finite Element Analysis. John Wiley & Sons (2000). [Google Scholar]
  3. Alt H.W. and Luckhaus S., Quasilinear elliptic-parabolic differential equations. Math. Z 183 (1983) 311–341. [Google Scholar]
  4. Amestoy P.R., Duff I.S. and L'Excellent J.-Y., Multifrontal parallel distributed symmetric and unsymmetric solvers. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 184 (2000) 501–520. [Google Scholar]
  5. Amestoy P.R., Duff I.S., Koster J. and L'Excellent J.-Y., A fully asynchronous multifrontal solver using distributed dynamic scheduling. SIAM J. Matriz Anal. App. 23 (2001) 15–41. [Google Scholar]
  6. Amestoy P.R., Guermouche A., L'Excellent J.-Y. and Pralet S., Hybrid scheduling for the parallel solution of linear systems. Parallel Comput. 32 (2006) 136–156. [Google Scholar]
  7. Arbogast T., Wheeler M. and Zhang N.-Y., A nonlinear mixed finite element method for a decade parabolic equation arising in flow in porous media. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 33 (1996) 1669–1687. [Google Scholar]
  8. Arnold D.N., Brezzi F., Cockburn B. and Marini L.D., Unified analysis of discontinuous Galerkin methods for elliptic problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 39 (2002) 1749–1779. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Babuška I., Feistauer M. and Šolín P., On one approach to a posteriori error estimates for evolution problems solved by the method of lines. Numer. Math. 89 (2001) 225–256. [Google Scholar]
  10. Baron V., Coudière Y. and Sochala P., Adaptive multistep time discretization and linearization based on a posteriori error estimates for the Richards equation. Appl. Numer. Math. 112 (2017) 104–125. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bastian P., A fully-coupled discontinuous Galerkin method for two-phase flow in porous media with discontinuous capillary pressure. Comput. Geosci. 18 (2014) 779–796. [Google Scholar]
  12. Berardi M. and Difonzo F.V., Strong solutions for Richards' equation with Cauchy conditions and constant pressure gradient. Environ. Fluid Mech. 20 (2020) 165–174. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bernardi C., El Alaoui L. and Mghazli Z., A posteriori analysis of a space and time discretization of a nonlinear model for the flow in partially saturated porous media. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 34 (2014) 1002–1036. [Google Scholar]
  14. Braess D., Pillwein V. and Schöberl J., Equilibrated residual error estimates are p-robust. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 198 (2009) 1189–1197. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cancès C., Nabet F. and Vohralík M., Convergence and a posteriori error analysis for energy-stable finite element approximations of degenerate parabolic equations. Math. Comput. 90 (2021) 517–563. [Google Scholar]
  16. Clément J.-B., Golay F., Ersoy M. and Sous D., An adaptive strategy for discontinuous Galerkin simulations of Richards equation: application to multi-materials dam wetting. Adv. Water Resour. 151 (2021) 103897. [Google Scholar]
  17. Congreve S., Dolejší V. and Sakic S., Error analysis for local discontinuous Galerkin semidiscretization of Richards' equation. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 45 (2025) 580–630. [Google Scholar]
  18. DiBenedetto E., Degenerate Parabolic Equations. Springer, New York (1993). [Google Scholar]
  19. Dolejší V., Ern A. and Vohralík M., A framework for robust a posteriori error control in unsteady nonlinear advection-diffusion problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 51 (2013) 773–793. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dolejší V. and Feistauer M., Discontinuous Galerkin Method: Analysis and Applications to Compressible Flow. Vol. 48. Springer (2015). [Google Scholar]
  21. Dolejší V., Kuraz M. and Solin P., Adaptive higher-order space-time discontinuous Galerkin method for the computer simulation of variably-saturated porous media flows. Appl. Math. Modell. 72 (2019) 276–305. [Google Scholar]
  22. Dolejší V., Roskovec F. and Vlasák M., A posteriori error estimates for higher order space-time Galerkin discretizations of nonlinear parabolic problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 59 (2021) 1486–1509. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dolejší V., Shin H.-G. and Vlasák M., Error estimates and adaptivity of the space-time discontinuous Galerkin method for solving the Richards equation. J. Sci. Comput. 101 (2024) 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ebmeyer C., Error estimates for a class of degenerate parabolic equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 35 (1998) 1095–1112. [Google Scholar]
  25. El Alaoui L., An adaptive finite volume box scheme for solving a class of nonlinear parabolic equations. Appl. Math. Lett. 22 (2009) 291–296. [Google Scholar]
  26. Epshteyn Y. and Rivière B., Analysis of hp discontinuous Galerkin methods for incompressible two-phase flow. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 225 (2009) 487–509. [Google Scholar]
  27. Eriksson K. and Johnson C., Adaptive finite element methods for parabolic problems IV: nonlinear problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 32 (1995) 1729–1749. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ern A. and Vohralík M., A posteriori error estimation based on potential and flux reconstruction for the heat equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 48 (2010) 198–223. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ern A., Smears I. and Vohralík M., Guaranteed, locally space-time efficient, and polynomial-degree robust a posteriori error estimates for high-order discretizations of parabolic problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 55 (2017) 2811–2834. [Google Scholar]
  30. Eymard R., Gutnic M. and Hilhorst D., The finite volume method for Richards equation. Comput. Geosci. 3 (1999) 259–294. [Google Scholar]
  31. Eymard R., Hilhorst D. and Vohralík M., A combined finite volume-nonconforming/mixed-hybrid finite element scheme for degenerate parabolic problems. Numer. Math. 105 (2006) 73–131. [Google Scholar]
  32. Farthing M.W. and Ogden F.L., Numerical solution of Richards' equation: a review of advances and challenges. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 81 (2017) 1257–1269. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gardner W.R., Some steady-state solutions of the unsaturated moisture flow equation with application to evaporation from a water table. Soil Sci. 85 (1958) 228–232. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kim I.C. and Požár N., Nonlinear elliptic-parabolic problems. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 210 (2013) 975–1020. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kreuzer C., Reliable and efficient a posteriori error estimates for finite element approximations of the parabolic-Laplacian. Calcolo 50 (2013) 79–110. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  36. Li H., Farthing M. and Miller C., Adaptive local discontinuous Galerkin approximation to Richards' equation. Adv. Water Resour. 30 (2007) 1883–1901. [Google Scholar]
  37. List F. and Radu F.A., A study on iterative methods for solving Richards' equation. Comput. Geosci. 20 (2016) 341–353. [Google Scholar]
  38. Mitra K. and Vohralík M., A posteriori error estimates for the Richards equation. Math. Comput. 93 (2024) 1053–1096. [Google Scholar]
  39. Nochetto R.H. and Verdi C., Approximation of degenerate parabolic problems using a numerical integration. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 25 (1988) 784–814. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ohlberger M., Convergence of a mixed finite elements-finite volume method for the two phase flow in porous media. East-West J. Numer. Math. 5 (1997) 183–210. [Google Scholar]
  41. Radu F., Pop I. and Knabner P., Error estimates for a mixed finite element discretization of some degenerate parabolic equations. Numer. Math. 109 (2008) 285–311. [Google Scholar]
  42. Richards L.A., Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums. J. Appl. Phys. 1 (1931) 318–333. [Google Scholar]
  43. Sakic S., Numerical solution of degenerate parabolic problems. Ph.D. thesis, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (2024). [Google Scholar]
  44. Shin H.-G., A posteriori error estimates and adaptivity for solving the Richards equation. Ph.D. thesis, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (2025). [Google Scholar]
  45. Solin P. and Kuraz M., Solving the nonstationary Richards equation with adaptive hp-FEM. Adv. Water Resour. 34 (2011) 1062–1081. [Google Scholar]
  46. Tracy F.T., Clean two- and three-dimensional analytical solutions of Richards' equation for testing numerical solvers. Water Resour. Res. 42 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  47. Tran T. and Duong T.-B., A complete analysis for some a posteriori error estimates with the finite element method of lines for a nonlinear parabolic equation. Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 23 (2002) 891–909. [Google Scholar]
  48. Verfürth R., A Posteriori Error Estimation Techniques for Finite Element Methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (2013). [Google Scholar]
  49. Woodward C.S. and Dawson C.N., Analysis of expanded mixed finite element methods for a nonlinear parabolic equation modeling flow into variably saturated porous media. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 37 (2000) 701–724. [Google Scholar]
  50. Yotov I., Mixed finite element discretization on non-matching multiblock grids for a degenerate parabolic equation arising in porous media flow. East-West J. Numer. Math. 5 (1997) 211–230. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you