EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Sciengine logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 60 / No 1 (January-February 2026) ESAIM: M2AN, 60 1 (2026) 445-471 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 60, Number 1, January-February 2026
Page(s) 445 - 471
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2026006
Published online 11 March 2026
  1. A. Abdulle and Y. Bai, Reduced basis finite element heterogeneous multiscale method for high-order discretizations of elliptic homogenization problems. J. Comput. Phys. 231 (2012) 7014–7036. [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Abdulle, E. Weinan, B. Engquist and E. Vanden-Eijnden, The heterogeneous multiscale method. Acta Numer. 21 (2012) 1–87. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Allaire and R. Brizzi, A multiscale finite element method for numerical homogenization. Multiscale Model. Simul. 4 (2005) 790–812. [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Altmann, P. Henning and D. Peterseim, Numerical homogenization beyond scale separation. Acta Numer. 30 (2021) 1–86. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Araya, C. Harder, D. Paredes and F. Valentin, Multiscale hybrid-mixed method. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 51 (2013) 3505–3531. [Google Scholar]
  6. I. Babuška and R. Lipton, Optimal local approximation spaces for generalized finite element methods with application to multiscale problems. Multiscale Model. Simul. 9 (2011) 373–406. [Google Scholar]
  7. I. Babuška and J.E. Osborn, Generalized finite element methods: their performance and their relation to mixed methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 20 (1983) 510–536. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  8. I.M. Babuška and S.A. Sauter, Is the pollution effect of the FEM avoidable for the Helmholtz equation considering high wave numbers? SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 34 (1997) 2392–2423. [Google Scholar]
  9. I. Babuška and M. Suri, The optimal convergence rate of the p-version of the finite element method. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 24 (1987) 750–776. [Google Scholar]
  10. I. Babuška, G. Caloz and J.E. Osborn, Special finite element methods for a class of second order elliptic problems with rough coefficients. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 31 (1994) 945–981. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  11. W. Bao and Y. Cai, Mathematical theory and numerical methods for Bose-Einstein condensation. Kinet. Relat. Models 6 (2013) 1–135. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Bernkopf, T. Chaumont-Frelet and J. Melenk, Wavenumber-explicit stability and convergence analysis of hp finite element discretizations of Helmholtz problems in piecewise smooth media. Math. Comput. 94 (2024) 73–122. [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Boffi, F. Brezzi and M. Fortin, Mixed Finite Element Methods and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). [Google Scholar]
  14. D.L. Brown, D. Gallistl and D. Peterseim, Multiscale Petrov Galerkin method for high-frequency heterogeneous Helmholtz equations, in Meshfree Methods for Partial Differential Equations VIII. Springer International Publishing (2017) 85–115. [Google Scholar]
  15. E. Cancès, R. Chakir and Y. Maday, Numerical analysis of nonlinear eigenvalue problems. J. Sci. Comput. 45 (2010) 90–117. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  16. C. Carstensen, Quasi-interpolation and a posteriori error analysis in finite element methods. M2AN Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 33 (1999) 1187–1202. [Google Scholar]
  17. T. Chaumont-Frelet and E.A. Spence, Scattering by finely layered obstacles: frequency-explicit bounds and homogenization. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 55 (2023) 1319–1363. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Cicuttin, A. Ern and S. Lemaire, A hybrid high-order method for highly oscillatory elliptic problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 19 (2019) 723–748. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  19. C. Döding, Localized orthogonal decomposition methods vs. classical FEM for the Gross-Pitaevskii equation, in Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications ENUMATH 2023. Vol. 153 of Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Eng. Springer, Cham (2025) 268–277. [Google Scholar]
  20. Z. Dong, M. Hauck and R. Maier, An improved high-order method for elliptic multiscale problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 61 (2023) 1918–1937. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  21. Y. Du and H. Wu, Preasymptotic error analysis of higher order FEM and CIP-FEM for Helmholtz equation with high wave number. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 53 (2015) 782–804. [Google Scholar]
  22. Y. Efendiev, J. Galvis and T.Y. Hou, Generalized multiscale finite element methods (GMsFEM). J. Comput. Phys. 251 (2013) 116–135. [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Ern and J.-L. Guermond, Theory and Practice of Finite Elements. Vol. 159 of Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer New York (2004). [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Ern and J.-L. Guermond, Finite element quasi-interpolation and best approximation. ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 51 (2017) 1367–1385. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  25. S. Esterhazy and J.M. Melenk, On Stability of Discretizations of the Helmholtz Equation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2011) 285–324. [Google Scholar]
  26. P. Freese, M. Hauck, T. Keil and D. Peterseim, A super-localized generalized finite element method. Numer. Math. 156 (2024) 205–235. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  27. P. Freese, M. Hauck and D. Peterseim, Super-localized orthogonal decomposition for high-frequency Helmholtz problems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 46 (2024) A2377–A2397. [Google Scholar]
  28. L.G. Graham and S.A. Sauter, Stability and finite element error analysis for the Helmholtz equation with variable coefficients. Math. Comput. 89 (2019) 105–138. [Google Scholar]
  29. C. Harder, D. Paredes and F. Valentin, A family of multiscale hybrid-mixed finite element methods for the Darcy equation with rough coefficients. J. Comput. Phys. 245 (2013) 107–130. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Hauck and A. Lozinski, A high-order localized orthogonal decomposition method for heterogeneous Stokes problems. Preprint arXiv:2511.22684 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Hauck and D. Peterseim, Multi-resolution localized orthogonal decomposition for Helmholtz problems. Multiscale Model. Simul. 20 (2022) 657–684. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  32. M. Hauck and D. Peterseim, Super-localization of elliptic multiscale problems. Math. Comput. 92 (2023) 981–1003. [Google Scholar]
  33. M. Hauck, A. Målqvist and M. Mosquera, A localized orthogonal decomposition method for heterogeneous mixed-dimensional problems. Preprint arXiv:2510.09442 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  34. P. Henning and E. Jarlebring, The Gross-Pitaevskii Equation and Eigenvector Nonlinearities: Numerical Methods and Algorithms. SIAM Rev. 67 (2025) 256–317. [Google Scholar]
  35. P. Henning and A. Persson, On optimal convergence rates for discrete minimizers of the Gross-Pitaevskii energy in localized orthogonal decomposition spaces. Multiscale Model. Simul. 21 (2023) 993–1011. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  36. P. Henning and D. Peterseim, Oversampling for the multiscale finite element method. Multiscale Model. Simul. 11 (2013) 1149–1175. [Google Scholar]
  37. J.S. Hesthaven, S. Zhang and X. Zhu, High-order multiscale finite element method for elliptic problems. Multiscale Model. Simul. 12 (2014) 650–666. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  38. T.Y. Hou and X.-H. Wu, A multiscale finite element method for elliptic problems in composite materials and porous media. J. Comput. Phys. 134 (1997) 169–189. [Google Scholar]
  39. R. Li, P. Ming and F. Tang, An efficient high order heterogeneous multiscale method for elliptic problems. Multiscale Model. Simul. 10 (2012) 259–283. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  40. C. Ma, R. Scheichl and T. Dodwell, Novel design and analysis of generalized finite element methods based on locally optimal spectral approximations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 60 (2022) 244–273. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  41. R. Maier, Computational multiscale methods in unstructured heterogeneous media. Ph.D. thesis, University of Augsburg (2020). [Google Scholar]
  42. R. Maier, A high-order approach to elliptic multiscale problems with general unstructured coefficients. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 59 (2021) 1067–1089. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  43. R. Maier and B. Verfürth, Multiscale scattering in nonlinear Kerr-type media. Math. Comput. 91 (2022) 1655–1685. [Google Scholar]
  44. A. Målqvist and D. Peterseim, Localization of elliptic multiscale problems. Math. Comput. 83 (2014) 2583–2603. [Google Scholar]
  45. A. Målqvist and D. Peterseim, Numerical Homogenization By Localized Orthogonal Decomposition. Vol. 5 of SIAM Spotlights. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA (2020). [Google Scholar]
  46. J.M. Melenk and S.S. Sauter, Wavenumber explicit convergence analysis for galerkin discretizations of the Helmholtz equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 49 (2011) 1210–1243. [Google Scholar]
  47. P. Oswald, On a BPX-preconditioner for P1 elements. Computing (Wien. Print) 51 (1993) 125–133. [Google Scholar]
  48. H. Owhadi, Multigrid with rough coefficients and multiresolution operator decomposition from hierarchical information games. SIAM Rev. 59 (2017) 99–149. [Google Scholar]
  49. H. Owhadi and C. Scovel, Operator-adapted Wavelets, Fast Solvers, and Numerical Homogenization. Vol. 35 of Cambridge Monographs on Applied and Computational Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2019). [Google Scholar]
  50. H. Owhadi, L. Zhang and L. Berlyand, Polyharmonic homogenization, rough polyharmonic splines and sparse super-localization. ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 48 (2014) 517–552. [Google Scholar]
  51. D. Peterseim, Eliminating the pollution effect in Helmholtz problems by local subscale correction. Math. Comput. 86 (2016) 1005–1036. [Google Scholar]
  52. D. Peterseim and B. Verfürth, Computational high frequency scattering from high-contrast heterogeneous media. Math. Comput. 89 (2020) 2649–2674. [Google Scholar]
  53. C. Schwab, Numerical mathematics and scientific computation, in p- and hp- Finite Element Methods. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England (1998). [Google Scholar]
  54. E. Weinan and B. Engquist, The heterogeneous multiscale methods. Commun. Math. Sci. 1 (2003) 87–132. [Google Scholar]
  55. E. Weinan and B. Engquist, The heterogeneous multi-scale method for homogenization problems, in Multiscale Methods in Science and Engineering. Vol. 44 of Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Eng. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2005) 89–110. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you