EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Sciengine logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 60 / No 2 (March-April 2026) ESAIM: M2AN, 60 2 (2026) 981-1019 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 60, Number 2, March-April 2026
Page(s) 981 - 1019
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2026024
Published online 17 April 2026
  1. B. Ayuso and L.D. Marini, Discontinuous Galerkin methods for advection–diffusion–reaction problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47 (2009) 1391–1420. [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Badia, J. Droniou, J. Manyer and J. Tushar, Analysis of BDDC preconditioners for non-conforming polytopal hybrid discretisation methods. Preprint arXiv:2506.11956 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Badia, J. Droniou and J. Tushar, A discrete trace theory for non-conforming polytopal hybrid discretisation methods. Found. Comput. Math. (2025) 1–50. [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Biros and O. Ghattas, Parallel Lagrange–Newton–Krylov–Schur methods for PDE-constrained optimization. Part I: the Krylov–Schur solver. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 27 (2005) 687–713. [Google Scholar]
  5. G. Biros and O. Ghattas, Parallel Lagrange–Newton–Krylov–Schur methods for PDE-constrained optimization. Part II: the Lagrange–Newton solver and its application to optimal control of steady viscous flows. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 27 (2005) 714–739. [Google Scholar]
  6. S.B. Boyana, T. Lewis, S. Liu and Y. Zhang, Convergence analysis of a dual-wind discontinuous Galerkin method for an elliptic optimal control problem with control constraints. Results Appl. Math. 27 (2025) 100624. [Google Scholar]
  7. S.C. Brenner, S. Liu and L.-Y. Sung, Multigrid methods for saddle point problems: Karush–Kuhn–Tucker systems. Preprint arXiv:1811.12434 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  8. S.C. Brenner, S. Liu and L.-Y. Sung, Multigrid methods for saddle point problems: optimality systems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 372 (2020) 112733. [Google Scholar]
  9. S.C. Brenner, S. Liu and L.-Y. Sung, A P1 finite element method for a distributed elliptic optimal control problem with a general state equation and pointwise state constraints. Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 21 (2021) 777–790. [Google Scholar]
  10. S.C. Brenner, S. Liu and L.-Y. Sung, Multigrid methods for an elliptic optimal control problem with pointwise state constraints. Results Appl. Math. 17 (2023) 100356. [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Chen, W. Hu, J. Shen, J.R. Singler, Y. Zhang and X. Zheng, An HDG method for distributed control of convection diffusion PDEs. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 343 (2018) 643–661. [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Chen, J.R. Singler and Y. Zhang, An HDG method for Dirichlet boundary control of convection dominated diffusion PDEs. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 57 (2019) 1919–1946. [Google Scholar]
  13. B. Cockburn, O. Dubois, J. Gopalakrishnan and S. Tan, Multigrid for an HDG method. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 34 (2014) 1386–1425. [Google Scholar]
  14. S.S. Collis and M. Heinkenschloss, Analysis of the SUPG method for the solution of optimal control problems. CoRR. Preprint arXiv:2411.09828 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  15. C.R. Dohrmann, Preconditioning of saddle point systems by substructuring and a penalty approach, in Domain Decomposition Methods in Science and Engineering XVI. Vol. 55 of Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Eng. Springer, Berlin (2007) 53–64. [Google Scholar]
  16. C. Dohrmann and O. Widlund, Some recent tools and a BDDC algorithm for 3D problems in H(curl), in Domain Decomposition Methods in Science and Engineering XX. Vol. 91 of Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Eng. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) 15–25. [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Du and F.-J. Sayas, A note on devising HDG+ projections on polyhedral elements. Math. Comput. 90 (2021) 65–79. [Google Scholar]
  18. S.C. Eisenstat, H.C. Elman and M.H. Schultz, Variational iterative methods for nonsymmetric systems of linear equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 20 (1983) 345–357. [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Engel and M. Griebel, A multigrid method for constrained optimal control problems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 235 (2011) 4368–4388. [Google Scholar]
  20. G. Fu, W. Qiu and W. Zhang, An analysis of HDG methods for convection-dominated diffusion problems. ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 49 (2015) 225–256. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  21. F. Gaspoz, C. Kreuzer, A. Veeser and W. Wollner, Quasi-best approximation in optimization with PDE constraints. Inv. Prob. 36 (2019) 014004. [Google Scholar]
  22. W. Gong, Z. Tan and Z. Zhou, Optimal convergence of finite element approximation to an optimization problem with PDE constraint. Inverse Prob. 38 (2022) 045004. [Google Scholar]
  23. S.B. Hazra and V. Schulz, Simultaneous pseudo-timestepping for PDE-model based optimization problems. BIT 44 (2004) 457–472. [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Heinkenschloss and D. Leykekhman, Local error estimates for SUPG solutions of advection-dominated elliptic linear-quadratic optimal control problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47 (2010) 4607–4638. [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Hinze, A variational discretization concept in control constrained optimization: the linear-quadratic case. Comput. Optim. App. 30 (2005) 45–61. [Google Scholar]
  26. W. Hu, J. Shen, J.R. Singler, Y. Zhang and X. Zheng, A superconvergent HDG method for distributed control of convection diffusion PDEs. J. Sci. Comput. 76 (2018) 1436–1457. [Google Scholar]
  27. H.H. Kim, E.T. Chung and C.S. Lee, A BDDC algorithm for a class of staggered discontinuous Galerkin methods. Comput. Math. Appl. 67 (2014) 1373–1389. [Google Scholar]
  28. D. Leykekhman, Investigation of commutative properties of discontinuous Galerkin methods in PDE constrained optimal control problems. J. Sci. Comput. 53 (2012) 483–511. [Google Scholar]
  29. D. Leykekhman and M. Heinkenschloss, Local error analysis of discontinuous Galerkin methods for advection-dominated elliptic linear-quadratic optimal control problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 50 (2012) 2012–2038. [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Li and X. Tu, Convergence analysis of a balancing domain decomposition method for solving a class of indefinite linear systems. Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 16 (2009) 745–773. [Google Scholar]
  31. J.-L. Lions, Optimal Control of Systems Governed by Partial Differential Equations. Vol. 170 of Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1971). [Google Scholar]
  32. S. Liu, Robust multigrid methods for discontinuous Galerkin discretizations of an elliptic optimal control problem. Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 25 (2025) 133–151. [Google Scholar]
  33. S. Liu and V. Simoncini, Multigrid preconditioning for discontinuous Galerkin discretizations of an elliptic optimal control problem with a convection-dominated state equation. J. Sci. Comput. 101 (2024) 79. [Google Scholar]
  34. S. Liu and J. Zhang, A balancing domain decomposition by constraints preconditioner for a hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin discretization of an elliptic optimal control problem. Preprint arXiv:2504.02072 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  35. S. Liu, Z. Tan and Y. Zhang, Discontinuous Galerkin methods for an elliptic optimal control problem with a general state equation and pointwise state constraints. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 437 (2024) 115494. [Google Scholar]
  36. J. Schöberl, R. Simon and W. Zulehner, A robust multigrid method for elliptic optimal control problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 49 (2011) 1482–1503. [Google Scholar]
  37. R. Simon and W. Zulehner, On Schwarz-type Smoothers for saddle point problems with applications to PDE-constrained optimization problems. Numer. Math. 111 (2009) 445–468. [Google Scholar]
  38. S. Ta’asan, “One-shot” methods for optimal control of distributed parameter systems I: finite dimensional control. Technical Report ICASE Report 91-2, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA (1991). [Google Scholar]
  39. F. Tröltzsch, Optimal Control of Partial Differential Equations: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Vol. 112 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2010). [Google Scholar]
  40. X. Tu, A BDDC algorithm for a mixed formulation of flows in porous media. Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal. 20 (2005) 164–179. [Google Scholar]
  41. X. Tu, A BDDC algorithm for flow in porous media with a hybrid finite element discretization. Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal. 26 (2007) 146–160. [Google Scholar]
  42. X. Tu, Three-level BDDC in three dimensions. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 29 (2007) 1759–1780. [Google Scholar]
  43. X. Tu, Three-level BDDC in two dimensions. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 69 (2007) 33–59. [Google Scholar]
  44. X. Tu, A three-level BDDC algorithm for saddle point problems. Numer. Math. 119 (2011) 189–217. [Google Scholar]
  45. X. Tu and J. Li, A balancing domain decomposition method by constraints for advection–diffusion problems. Commun. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 3 (2008) 25–60. [Google Scholar]
  46. X. Tu and B. Wang, A BDDC algorithm for second-order elliptic problems with hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin discretizations. Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal. 45 (2016) 354–370. [Google Scholar]
  47. X. Tu and J. Zhang, BDDC algorithms for advection–diffusion problems with HDG discretizations. Comput. Math. Appl. 101 (2021) 74–106. [Google Scholar]
  48. X. Tu and J. Zhang, BDDC algorithms for Oseen problems with HDG discretizations. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 43 (2023) 3478–3521. [Google Scholar]
  49. X. Tu, B. Wang and J. Zhang, Analysis of BDDC algorithms for Stokes problems with hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin discretizations. Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal. 52 (2020) 553–570. [Google Scholar]
  50. O.B. Widlund, BDDC domain decomposition algorithms, in 75 Years of Mathematics of Computation. Vol. 754 of Contemp. Math. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI (2020) 261–281. [Google Scholar]
  51. O.B. Widlund and C.R. Dohrmann, BDDC deluxe domain decomposition, in Domain Decomposition Methods in Science and Engineering XXII. Vol. 104 of Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Eng. Springer, Cham (2016) 93–103. [Google Scholar]
  52. S. Zampini and X. Tu, Adaptive multilevel BDDC deluxe algorithms for flow in porous media. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 39 (2017) A1389–A1415. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you