EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Sciengine logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 60 / No 3 (May-June 2026) ESAIM: M2AN, 60 3 (2026) 1135-1175 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 60, Number 3, May-June 2026
Page(s) 1135 - 1175
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2026027
Published online 01 June 2026
  1. T. Alemán, M. Halla, C. Lehrenfeld and P. Stocker, Robust finite element discretizations for a simplified Galbrun's equation. ECCOMAS 2022 (2022). DOI: 10.23967/eccomas.2022.206. [Google Scholar]
  2. H. Barucq, F. Faucher, D. Fournier, L. Gizon and H. Pham, Efficient and accurate algorithm for the full modal Green's kernel of the scalar wave equation in helioseismology. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 80 (2020) 2657–2683. [Google Scholar]
  3. H. Barucq, F. Faucher, D. Fournier, L. Gizon and H. Pham, Outgoing modal solutions for Galbrun's equation in helioseismology. J. Differ. Equ. 286 (2021) 494–530. [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Barucq, N. Rouxelin and S. Tordeux, Construction and analysis of a HDG solution for the total-flux formulation of the convected Helmholtz equation. Math. Comput. 92 (2023) 2097–2131. [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Bassi and S. Rebay, A high-order acurate discontinuous finite element method for the numerical solution of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys. 131 (1997) 267–279. [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Bertoluzza, The discrete commutator property of approximation spaces. C. R. Acad. Sci.-Ser. I-Math. 329 (1999) 1097–1102. [Google Scholar]
  7. A.S. Bonnet-Ben Dhia, P. Ciarlet and C.M. Zwölf, Time harmonic wave diffraction problems in materials with sign-shifting coefficients. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 234 (2010) 1912–1919. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  8. A.S. Bonnet-Ben Dhia, L. Chesnel and P. Ciarlet, T-coercivity for scalar interface problems between dielectrics and metamaterials. ESAIM: Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 46 (2012) 1363–1387. [Google Scholar]
  9. A.S. Bonnet-Ben Dhia, J.F. Mercier, F. Millot, S. Pernet and E. Peynaud, Time-harmonic acoustic scattering in a complex flow: a full coupling between acoustics and hydrodynamics. Commun. Comput. Phys. 11 (2012) 555–572. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  10. A.S. Bonnet-Ben Dhia, L. Chesnel and P. Ciarlet, T-coercivity for the Maxwell problem with sign-changing coefficients. Commun. Part. Differ. Equ. 39 (2014) 1007–1031. [Google Scholar]
  11. F. Brezzi, J. Douglas, R. Durán and M. Fortin, Mixed finite elements for second order elliptic problems in three variables. Numer. Math. 51 (1987) 237–250. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  12. F. Brezzi, G. Manzini, D. Marini, P. Pietra and A. Russo, Discontinuous Galerkin approximations for elliptic problems. Numer. Methods Part. Differ. Equ. 16 (2000) 365–378. [Google Scholar]
  13. E. Burman and A. Ern, Discontinuous Galerkin approximation with discrete variational principle for the nonlinear Laplacian. C. R. Math. 346 (2008) 1013–1016. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Buffa and C. Ortner, Compact embeddings of broken Sobolev spaces and applications. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 29 (2009) 827–855. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Buffa, M. Costabel and C. Schwab, Boundary element methods for Maxwell's equations on non-smooth domains. Numer. Math. 92 (2002) 679–710. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Chabassier and M. Duruflé, Solving time-harmonic Galbrun's equation with an arbitrary flow. Application to Helioseismology. Research Report RR-9192, INRIA Bordeaux (2018). [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Chesnel and P. Ciarlet, T-coercivity and continuous Galerkin methods: application to transmission problems with sign changing coefficients. Numer. Math. 124 (2013) 1–29. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Christensen-Dalsgaard, W. Däppen, S.V. Ajukov, E.R. Anderson, H.M. Antia, S. Basu, V.A. Baturin, G. Berthomieu, B. Chaboyer, S.M. Chitre, A.N. Cox, P. Demarque, J. Donatowicz, W.A. Dziembowski, M. Gabriel, D.O. Gough, D.B. Guenther, J.A. Guzik, J.W. Harvey, F. Hill, G. Houdek, C.A. Iglesias, A.G. Kosovichev, J.W. Leibacher, P. Morel, C.R. Proffitt, J. Provost, J. Reiter, E.J. Rhodes, F.J. Rogers, I.W. Roxburgh, M.J. Thompson and R.K. Ulrich, The current state of solar modeling. Science 272 (1996) 1286–1292. [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Ciarlet, T-coercivity: application to the discretization of Helmholtz-like problems. Comput. Math. App. 64 (2012) 22–34. [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Cicuttin, A. Ern and N. Pignet, Hybrid High-Order Methods A Primer with Applications to Solid Mechanics. Springer Briefs in Mathematics. Springer, Cham (2021). [Google Scholar]
  21. B. Cockburn, J. Gopalakrishnan and R. Lazarov, Unified hybridization of discontinuous Galerkin, mixed, and continuous Galerkin methods for second order elliptic problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47 (2009) 1319–1365. [Google Scholar]
  22. D.A. Di Pietro and A. Ern, Discrete functional analysis tools for discontinuous Galerkin methods with application to the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Math. Comput. 79 (2010) 1303–1330. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. D.A. Di Pietro and A. Ern, A hybrid high-order locking-free method for linear elasticity on general meshes. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 283 (2015) 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  24. D.A. Di Pietro, A. Ern and S. Lemaire, An arbitrary-order and compact-stencil discretization of diffusion on general meshes based on local reconstruction operators. Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 14 (2014) 461–472. [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Ern and J.L. Guermond, Mollification in strongly Lipschitz domains with application to continuous and discrete De Rham complexes. Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 16 (2016) 51–75. [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Ern and J.L. Guermond, Finite Elements I: Approximation and Interpolation. Springer (2021). [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Ern and J.L. Guermond, Finite Elements II: Galerkin Approximation, Elliptic and Mixed PDEs. Springer (2021). [Google Scholar]
  28. P.E. Farrell, T. van Beeck and U. Zerbinati, Analysis and numerical analysis of the Helmholtz-Korteweg equation. arXiv:2503.10771 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  29. D. Fournier, T. Hohage, J. Preuss and L. Gizon, Learned infinite elements for helioseismology Learning transparent boundary conditions for the solar atmosphere. A&A 690 (2024) A86. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  30. H. Galbrun, Propagation d'une onde sonore dans l'atmosphre et théorie des zones de silence. Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1931). [Google Scholar]
  31. L. Gizon, A. Birch and H. Spruit, Local helioseismology: three dimensional imaging of the solar interior. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 48 (2010) 289–338. [Google Scholar]
  32. L. Gizon, H. Barucq, M. Duruflé, C.S. Hanson, M. Leguèbe, A.C. Birch, J. Chabassier, D. Fournier, T. Hohage and E. Papini, Computational helioseismology in the frequency domain: acoustic waves in axisymmetric solar models with flows. Astron. Astrophys. 600 (2017) A35. [Google Scholar]
  33. I. Gohberg, S. Goldberg and M.A. Kaashoek, Classes of Linear Operators. Vol. I. Birkhauser (1990). [Google Scholar]
  34. P. Grisvard, Elliptic Problems in Nonsmooth Domains. SIAM (2011). [Google Scholar]
  35. L. Hägg and M. Berggren, On the well-posedness of Galbrun’s equation. J. Math. Pures App. 150 (2021) 112–133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. M. Halla, Galerkin Approximation of Holomorphic Eigenvalue Problems: Weak T-coercivity and T-compatibility. Numer. Math. 148 (2021) 387–407. [Google Scholar]
  37. M. Halla, Convergence analysis of nonconforming H(div)-finite elements for the damped time-harmonic Galbrun’s equation. Numer. Math. (2026). DOI: 10.1007/s00211-026-01540-8. [Google Scholar]
  38. M. Halla and T. Hohage, On the well-posedness of the damped time-harmonic Galbrun equation and the equations of stellar oscillations. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 53 (2021) 4068–4095. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  39. M. Halla, C. Lehrenfeld and P. Stocker, A new T-compatibility condition and its application to the discretization of the damped time-harmonic Galbrun’s equation. IMA J. Numer. Anal. (2025) draf071. [Google Scholar]
  40. M. Halla, C. Lehrenfeld and T. van Beeck, Replication Data for: Hybrid Discontinuous Galerkin Discretizations for the damped time-harmonic Galbrun’s equation (2025). [Google Scholar]
  41. M. Halla, T. Hohage and F. Oberender, A new numerical method for scalar eigenvalue problems in heterogeneous, dispersive, sign-changing materials. J. Sci. Comput. 106 (2026) 61. [Google Scholar]
  42. T. Hohage and L. Nannen, Convergence of infinite element methods for scalar waveguide problems. BIT Numer. Math. 55 (2015) 215–254. [Google Scholar]
  43. T. Hohage, C. Lehrenfeld and J. Preuß, Learned infinite elements. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 43 (2021) A3552–A3579. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. R.M. Kirby, S.J. Sherwin and B. Cockburn, To CG or to HDG. J. Sci. Comput. 51 (2012) 183–212. [Google Scholar]
  45. K. Kirk, A. Cesmelioglu and S. Rhebergen, Convergence to weak solutions of a space-time hybridized discontinuous Galerkin method for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Math. Comput. 92 (2023) 147–174. [Google Scholar]
  46. P.L. Lederer, C. Lehrenfeld and J. Schöberl, Hybrid Discontinuous Galerkin methods with relaxed H(div)-conformity for incompressible flows. Part I. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 56 (2018) 2070–2094. [Google Scholar]
  47. P.L. Lederer, C. Lehrenfeld and J. Schöberl, Hybrid Discontinuous Galerkin methods with relaxed H(div)-conformity for incompressible flows. Part II. ESAIM: M2AN 53 (2019) 503–522. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  48. C. Lehrenfeld, Hybrid discontinuous Galerkin methods for incompressible flow problems. Master’s thesis, RWTH Aachen (May 2010). DOI: 10.25625/O4VBYH. [Google Scholar]
  49. C. Lehrenfeld and J. Schöberl, High order exactly divergence-free Hybrid Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for unsteady incompressible flows. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 307 (2016) 339–361. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. C. Lindsey and D.C. Braun, Helioseismic holography. Astrophys. J. 485 (1997) 895. [Google Scholar]
  51. M. Maeder, G. Gabard and S. Marburg, 90 years of Galbrun’s equation: an unusual formulation for aeroacoustics and hydroacoustics in terms of the Lagrangian displacement. J. Theor. Comput. Acoust. 28 (2020) 2050017. [Google Scholar]
  52. B. Müller, T. Hohage, D. Fournier and L. Gizon, Quantitative passive imaging by iterative holography: the example of helioseismic holography. Inv. Prob. 40 (2024) 045016. [Google Scholar]
  53. H. Pham, F. Faucher, D. Fournier, H. Barucq and L. Gizon, Assembling algorithm for Green’s tensors and absorbing boundary conditions for Galbrun’s equation in radial symmetry. J. Comput. Phys. 519 (2024) 113444. [Google Scholar]
  54. F.J. Sayas, T.S. Brown and M.E. Hassell, Variational Techniques for Elliptic Partial Differential Equations: Theoretical Tools and Advanced Applications. CRC Press (2019). [Google Scholar]
  55. J. Schöberl, Netgen an advancing front 2d/3d-mesh generator based on abstract rules. Comput. Visual. Sci. 1 (1997) 41–52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. J. Schöberl, C++ 11 implementation of finite elements in NGSolve. Institute for analysis and scientific computing, Vienna University of Technology 30 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  57. L.R. Scott and M. Vogelius, Norm estimates for a maximal right inverse of the divergence operator in spaces of piecewise polynomials. ESAIM: Math. Modell. Numer. Anal. 19 (1985) 111–143. [Google Scholar]
  58. F. Stummel, Diskrete Konvergenz linearer Operatoren. I. Math. Ann. 190 (1970) 45–92. [Google Scholar]
  59. G. Vainikko, Funktionalanalysis der Diskretisierungsmethoden. B. G. Teubner Verlag (1976). [Google Scholar]
  60. T. van Beeck, On stable discontinuous Galerkin discretizations for Galbrun’s equation. Master’s thesis, University of Göttingen (2023). DOI: 10.25625/KGHQWV/F6PCXK. [Google Scholar]
  61. T. van Beeck and U. Zerbinati, An adaptive mesh refinement strategy to ensure quasi-optimality of finite element methods for self-adjoint Helmholtz problems. Preprint arXiv:2403.06266 (2024). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you