Free Access
Issue
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 43, Number 3, May-June 2009
Page(s) 507 - 522
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2009004
Published online 07 February 2009
  1. G. Aletti, G. Naldi and G. Toscani, First-order continuous models of opinion formation. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 67 (2007) 837–853 (electronic). [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  2. E. Ben-Naim, Opinion dynamics: rise and fall of political parties. Europhys. Lett. 69 (2005) 671–677. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. G.A. Bird, Molecular gas dynamics and the direct simulation of gas flows, Oxford Engineering Science Series 42. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York (1995). Corrected reprint of the 1994 original, Oxford Science Publications. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Campiti, G. Metafune and D. Pallara, Degenerate self-adjoint evolution equations on the unit interval. Semigroup Forum 57 (1998) 1–36. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  5. J.A. Carrillo, S. Cordier and G. Toscani, Over-populated tails for conservative in the mean, inelastic Maxwell models. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. A (to appear). Available at http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00206273/fr/. [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Cordier, L. Pareschi and G. Toscani, On a kinetic model for a simple market economy. J. Stat. Phys. 120 (2005) 253–277. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  7. G. Deffuant, D. Neau, F. Amblard and G. Weisbuch, Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Adv. Complex Systems 3 (2000) 87–98. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. M.R. Feix, D. Lepelley, V. Merlin and J.-L. Rouet, The probability of conflicts in a U.S. presidential type election. Econom. Theory 23 (2004) 227–257. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Galam, Rational group decision making: A random field Ising model at Formula . Phys. A 238 (1997) 66–80. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Galam, Contrarian deterministic effects on opinion dynamics: the hung elections scenario. Phys. A 333 (2004) 453–460. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Galam, Heterogeneous beliefs, segregation, and extremism in the making of public opinions. Phys. Rev. E 71 (2005) 046123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Galam and S. Moscovici, Towards a theory of collective phenomena: consensus and attitude changes in groups. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 21 (1991) 49–74. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Galam and J.-D. Zucker, From individual choice to group decision-making. Phys. A 287 (2000) 644–659. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Galam, Y. Gefen and Y. Shapir, Sociophysics: A new approach of sociological collective behaviour. I. Mean-behaviour description of a strike. J. Math. Sociol. 9 (1982) 1–23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Hegselmann and U. Krause, Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Sim. 5 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  16. F. Slanina, Inelastically scattering particles and wealth distribution in an open economy. Phys. Rev. E 69 (2004) 046102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Slanina and H. Lavicka, Analytical results for the Sznajd model of opinion formation. Eur. Phys. J. B 35 (2003) 279–288. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  18. K. Sznajd-Weron and J. Sznajd, Opinion evolution in closed community. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 11 (2000) 1157–1166. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. G. Toscani, Kinetic models of opinion formation. Commun. Math. Sci. 4 (2006) 481–496. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you