Free Access
Volume 43, Number 6, November-December 2009
Page(s) 1045 - 1061
Published online 12 June 2009
  1. M. Avellaneda and A. Parás, Dynamic hedging portfolios for derivative securities in the presence of large transaction costs. Appl. Math. Finance 1 (1994) 165–193. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Barles and H.M. Soner, Option pricing with transaction costs and a nonlinear Black–Scholes equation. Finance Stochast. 2 (1998) 369–397. [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Boyle and T. Vorst, Option replication in discrete time with transaction costs. J. Finance 47 (1973) 271–293. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Company, E. Navarro, J.R. Pintos and E. Ponsoda, Numerical solution of linear and nonlinear Black–Scholes option pricing equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 56 (2008) 813–821. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Davis, V. Panis and T. Zariphopoulou, European option pricing with transaction fees. SIAM J. Contr. Optim. 31 (1993) 470–493. [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Dewynne, S. Howinson and P. Wilmott, Option pricing: mathematical models and computations. Oxford Financial Press, Oxford (2000). [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Düring, M. Fournier and A. Jungel, Convergence of a high order compact finite difference scheme for a nonlinear Black–Scholes equation. ESAIM: M2AN 38 (2004) 359–369. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Forsyth, K. Vetzal and R. Zvan, A finite element approach to the pricing of discrete lookbacks with stochastic volatility. Appl. Math. Finance 6 (1999) 87–106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. J.M. Harrison and S.R. Pliska, Martingales and stochastic integrals in the theory of continuous trading. Stochastic Processes Appl. 11 (1981) 215–260. [Google Scholar]
  10. S.D. Hodges and A. Neuberger, Optimal replication of contingent claims under transaction costs. Review of Futures Markets 8 (1989) 222–239. [Google Scholar]
  11. T. Hoggard, A.E. Whalley and P. Wilmott, Hedging option portfolios in the presence of transaction costs. Adv. Futures Options Research 7 (1994) 217–35. [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Kangro and R. Nicolaides, Far field boundary conditions for Black–Scholes equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 38 (2000) 1357–1368. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Leitner, Continuous time CAPM, price for risk and utility maximization, in Mathematical Finance – Workshop of the Mathematical Finance Research Project, Konstanz, Germany, M. Kohlmann and S. Tang Eds., Birkhäuser, Basel (2001). [Google Scholar]
  14. H.E. Leland, Option pricing and replication with transactions costs. J. Finance 40 (1985) 1283–1301. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. O. Pironneau and F. Hecht, Mesh adaption for the Black and Scholes equations. East-West J. Numer. Math. 8 (2000) 25–35. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Rigal, Numerical analisys of three-time-level finite difference schemes for unsteady diffusion-convection problems. J. Num. Meth. Engineering 30 (1990) 307–330. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. G.D. Smith, Numerical solution of partial differential equations: finite difference methods. Third Edition, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1985). [Google Scholar]
  18. H.M. Soner, S.E. Shreve and J. Cvitanic, There is no non-trivial hedging portfolio for option pricing with transaction costs. Ann. Appl. Probab. 5 (1995) 327–355. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  19. J.C. Strikwerda, Finite difference schemes and partial differential equations. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Mathematics Series (1989) 32–52. [Google Scholar]
  20. D. Tavella and C. Randall, Pricing financial instruments – The finite difference method. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (2000). [Google Scholar]
  21. A.E. Whalley and P. Wilmott, An asymptotic analysis of an optimal hedging model for option pricing with transaction costs. Math. Finance 7 (1997) 307–324. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you