Free Access
Volume 49, Number 1, January-February 2015
Page(s) 39 - 67
Published online 12 January 2015
  1. M. Carpenter, D. Gottlieb and S. Abarbanel, Time-stable conditions for finite-difference schemes solving hyperbolic systems: methodology and application to high-order compact schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 111 (1994) 220–236. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Carpenter, J. Nordström and D. Gottlieb, A stable and conservative interface treatment of arbitrary spatial accuracy. J. Comput. Phys. 148 (1999) 341–365. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. G.S. Constantinescu and S.K. Lele, Large eddy simulation of a near sonic turbulent jet and its radiated noise. AIAA Paper 0376 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Goldberg, On a boundary extrapolation theorem by Kreiss. Math. Comput. 31 (1977) 469–477. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Goldberg and E. Tadmor, Scheme-independent stability criteria for difference approximations of hyperbolic initial-boundary value problems. I. Math. Comput. 32 (1978) 1097–1107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Goldberg and E. Tadmor, Scheme-independent stability criteria for difference approximations of hyperbolic initial-boundary value problems. II. Math. Comput. 36 (1981) 603–626. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Gustafsson, On the implementation of boundary conditions for the methode of lines. BIT 38 (1998) 293–314. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Gustafsson, H.-O. Kreiss and J. Oliger, Time dependent problems and difference methods. John Wiley & Sons (1995). [Google Scholar]
  9. B. Gustafsson, H.-O. Kreiss and A. Sundström, Stability theory of difference approximations for mixed initial boundary value problem. II. Math. Comput. 26 (1972) 649–686. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. H.-O. Kreiss and G. Scherer, Finite element and finite difference methods for hyperbolic partial differential operators. Mathematical aspects of finite elements in partial differential equations. Academic Press, Orlando, FL (1974). [Google Scholar]
  11. H.-O. Kreiss and G. Scherer, On the existence of energy estimates for difference approximations for hyperbolic systems. Technical report, Uppsala University, Sweden (1977). [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Lee, S.K. Lele and P. Moin, Interaction of isotropic turbulence with shock waves: effect of shock strength. J. Fluid Mech. 340 (1997) 225–247. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. S.K. Lele, Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J. Comput. Phys. 103 (1992) 16–42. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. X. Liu, S. Zhang, H. Zhang and C.-W. Shu, A new class of central compact schemes with spectral-like resolution I: linear schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 248 (2013) 235–256. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. K. Mahesh, S.K. Lele and P. Moin, The influence of entropy fluctuation on the interaction of turbulence with a shock wave. J. Fluid Mech. 334 (1997) 353–379. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Mattsson, Boundary procedure for summation-by-parts operators. J. Sci. Comput. 18 (2003) 133–153. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Mattsson and J. Nordström, Summation by parts operators for finite difference approximations of second derivatives. J. Comput. Phys. 199 (2004) 503–540. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Moin, K. Squires, W. Cabot and S. Lee, A dynamic subgridscale model for compressible turbulence and scalar transport. Phys. Fluid 3 (1991) 2746–2757. [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Olson, Summation by parts, projection and stability: I. Math. Comput. 64 (1995) 1035–1065. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. C.-W. Shu and S. Osher, Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 77 (1988) 439–471. [Google Scholar]
  21. B. Strand, Summation by parts for finite difference approximations for d/dx. J. Comput. Phys. 110 (1994) 47–67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. J.C. Strikwerda, Initial boundary value problems for the method of lines. J. Comput. Phys. 34 (1980) 94–107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Tan and C.-W. Shu, Inverse Lax−Wendroff procedure for numerical boundary conditions of conservations laws. J. Comput. Phys. 229 (2010) 8144–8166. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Tan, C. Wang, C.-W. Shu and J. Ning, Efficient implementation of high order inverse Lax−Wendroff boundary treatment for conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 231 (2012) 2510–2527. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you