Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 54, Number 1, January-February 2020
Page(s) 25 - 58
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2019017
Published online 14 January 2020
  1. C. Audouze, L’utilisation du formalisme PAW en théorie de la fonctionnelle de la densité perturbée. Research Report CEA (2006). [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Audouze, F. Jollet, M. Torrent and X. Gonze, Projector augmented-wave approach to density-functional perturbation theory. Phys. Rev. B 73 (2006) 235101. [Google Scholar]
  3. X. Blanc, E. Cancès and M.-S. Dupuy, Variational projector augmented-wave method: theoretical analysis and preliminary numerical results. Preprint arXiv:1711.06529 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  4. X. Blanc, E. Cancès and M.-S. Dupuy, Variational projector augmented-wave method. C.R. Math. 355 (2017) 665–670. [Google Scholar]
  5. P.E. Blochl, Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50 (1994) 17953–17979. [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Cancès and G. Dusson, Discretization error cancellation in electronic structure calculation: toward a quantitative study. ESAIM: M2AN 51 (2017) 1617–1636. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  7. N. Holzwarth, A. Tackett and G. Matthews, A Projector Augmented Wave (PAW) code for electronic structure calculations, part I: atompaw for generating atom-centered functions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 135 (2001) 329–347. [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Jollet, M. Torrent and N. Holzwarth, Generation of projector augmented-wave atomic data: A 71 element validated table in the XML format. Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 1246–1254. [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Kato, On the eigenfunctions of many-particle systems in quantum mechanics. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 10 (1957) 151–177. [Google Scholar]
  10. L. Kleinman and D. Bylander, Efficacious form for model pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1425. [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59 (1999) 1758–1775. [Google Scholar]
  12. C.J. Pickard and F. Mauri, All-electron magnetic response with pseudopotentials: NMR chemical shifts. Phys. Rev. B 63 (2001) 245101. [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Torrent, F. Jollet, F. Bottin, G. Zérah and X. Gonze, Implementation of the projector augmented-wave method in the ABINIT code: application to the study of iron under pressure. Comput. Mater. Sci. 42 (2008) 337–351. [Google Scholar]
  14. N. Troullier and J.L. Martins, Efficient pseudopotentials for plane-wave calculations. Phys. Rev. B 43 (1991) 1993. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you