EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 59 / No 6 (November-December 2025) ESAIM: M2AN, 59 6 (2025) 3227-3247 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 59, Number 6, November-December 2025
Page(s) 3227 - 3247
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2025088
Published online 01 December 2025
  1. V. Barbu, Optimal Control of Variational Inequalities. Pitman (Advanced Publishing Program), Boston, MA (1984). [Google Scholar]
  2. J.W. Barrett and L. Prigozhin, Bean’s critical-state model as the p → ∞ limit of an evolutionary p-Laplacian equation. Nonlinear Anal. 42 (2000) 977–993. [Google Scholar]
  3. J.W. Barrett and L. Prigozhin, Dual formulations in critical state problems. Interf. Free Bound. 8 (2006) 349–370. [Google Scholar]
  4. J.W. Barrett and L. Prigozhin, A quasi-variational inequality problem in superconductivity. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 20 (2010) 679–706. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  5. J.W. Barrett and L. Prigozhin, Existence and approximation of a mixed formulation for thin film magnetization problems in superconductivity. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 24 (2014) 991–1015. [Google Scholar]
  6. J.W. Barrett and L. Prigozhin, Sandpiles and superconductors: nonconforming linear finite element approximations for mixed formulations of quasi-variational inequalities. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 35 (2015) 1–38. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  7. C.P. Bean, Magnetization of hard superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 8 (1962) 250–253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. C.P. Bean, Magnetization of high-field superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 36 (1964) 31–39. [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Caselli, M. Hensel and I. Yousept, Quasilinear variational inequalities in ferromagnetic shielding: well-posedness, regularity, and optimal control. SIAM J. Control Optim. 61 (2023) 2043–2068. [Google Scholar]
  10. S.S. Dragomir, Some Gronwall Type Inequalities and Applications. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., Hauppauge, NY, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Duvaut and J.L. Lions, Inequalities in Mechanics and Physics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1976). [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Fujita, A coherent analysis of Stokes flows under boundary conditions of friction type. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 149 (2002) 57–69. [Google Scholar]
  13. V. Girault and P.A. Raviart, Finite Element Methods for Navier–Stokes Equations. Theory and Algorithms. Vol. 5 of Springer Series in Computational Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1986). [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Glowinski, J. Lions and R. Tremolieres, Numerical Analysis of Variational Inequalities. Elsevier Science Ltd, North-Holland (1981). [Google Scholar]
  15. W. Han, M. Ling and F. Wang, Numerical solution of an H(curl)-elliptic hemivariational inequality. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 43 (2023) 976–1000. [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Hensel and I. Yousept, Numerical analysis for Maxwell obstacle problems in electric shielding. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 60 (2022) 1083–1110. [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Hensel, M. Winckler and I. Yousept, Numerical solutions to hyperbolic Maxwell quasi-variational inequalities in Bean–Kim model for type-II superconductivity. ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 58 (2024) 1385–1411. [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Hiptmair, Finite elements in computational electromagnetism. Acta Numer. 11 (2002) 237–339. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Hiptmair and J. Xu, Nodal auxiliary space preconditioning in H(curl ) and H(div) spaces. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 45 (2007) 2483–2509. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Hiptmair, L.X. Li, S.P. Mao and W.Y. Zheng, A fully divergence-free finite element method for magnetohydro-dynamic equations. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 28 (2018) 659–695. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  21. K.B. Hu, Y.C. Ma and J. Xu, Stable finite element methods preserving ∇ · B = 0 exactly for MHD models. Numer. Math. 135 (2017) 371–396. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  22. F. Jochmann, On a first-order hyperbolic system including Bean’s model for superconductors with displacement current. J. Differ. Equ. 246 (2009) 2151–2191. [Google Scholar]
  23. F. Jochmann, Well-posedness for Bean’s critical state model with displacement current. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 362 (2010) 505–513. [Google Scholar]
  24. T. Kashiwabara, On a finite element approximation of the Stokes equations under a slip boundary condition of the friction type. Jpn. J. Ind. Appl. Math. 30 (2013) 227–261. [Google Scholar]
  25. N. Kikuchi and J.T. Oden, Contact Problems in Elasticity: A Study of Variational Inequalities and Finite Element Methods. SIAM, Philadelphia (1988). [Google Scholar]
  26. Y.B. Kim, C.F. Hempstead and A.R. Strnad, Magnetization and critical supercurrents. Phys. Rev. 129 (1963) 528–535. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. T.V. Kolev and P.S. Vassilevski, Parallel auxiliary space AMG for H(curl) problems. J. Comput. Math. 27 (2009) 604–623. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Laurain, M. Winckler and I. Yousept, Shape optimization for superconductors governed by H(curl)-elliptic variational inequalities. SIAM J. Control Optim. 59 (2021) 2247–2272. [Google Scholar]
  29. Y. Li and K.T. Li, Uzawa iteration method for Stokes type variational inequality of the second kind. Acta. Math. Appl. Sin. 17 (2011) 303–316. [Google Scholar]
  30. J.L. Lions and G. Stampacchia, Variational inequalities. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 20 (1967) 493–519. [Google Scholar]
  31. H. Liu and L.B. Zhang, Parallel implementation of commonly used marking strategies in the adaptive finite element toolbox PHG. J. Numer. Methods Comput. Appl. 30 (2009) 315–320. [Google Scholar]
  32. A. Milani, On a variational inequality with time dependent convex constraints for the Maxwell equations. Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Politec. Torino 36 (1979) 389–401. [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Milani, On a variational inequality with time dependent convex constraint for the Maxwell equations. Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Politec. Torino 43 (1985) 171–183. [Google Scholar]
  34. F. Miranda, J.-F. Rodrigues and L. Santos, A class of stationary nonlinear Maxwell systems. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 19 (2009) 1883–1905. [Google Scholar]
  35. F. Miranda, J.-F. Rodrigues and L. Santos, On a p-curl system arising in electromagnetism. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 5 (2012) 605–629. [Google Scholar]
  36. F. Miranda, J.-F. Rodrigues and L. Santos, Evolutionary quasi-variational and variational inequalities with constraints on the derivatives. Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 9 (2020) 250–277. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  37. P. Monk, Finite Element Methods for Maxwell’s Equations. Numerical Analysis and Scientic Computation. Clarendon Press (2003). [Google Scholar]
  38. L. Prigozhin, On the Bean critical-state model in superconductivity. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 7 (1996) 237–247. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. L. Prigozhin, The Bean model in superconductivity: variational formulation and numerical solution. J. Comput. Phys. 129 (1996) 190–200. [Google Scholar]
  40. L. Prigozhin, Variational inequalities in critical-state problems. Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenom. 197 (2004) 197–210. [Google Scholar]
  41. M. Winckler and I. Yousept, Fully discrete scheme for Bean’s critical-state model with temperature effects in superconductivity. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 57 (2019) 2685–2706. [Google Scholar]
  42. M. Winckler and I. Yousept, Maxwell variational inequalities in type-II superconductivity. Int. Ser. Numer. Math. 172 (2022) 499–519. [Google Scholar]
  43. M. Winckler, I. Yousept and J. Zou, Adaptive edge element approximation for H(curl) elliptic variational inequalities of second kind. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 58 (2020) 1941–1964. [Google Scholar]
  44. I. Yousept, Optimal control of quasilinear H(curl)-elliptic partial differential equations in magnetostatic field problems. SIAM J. Control Optim. 5 (2013) 3624–3651. [Google Scholar]
  45. I. Yousept, Hyperbolic Maxwell variational inequalities for Bean’s critical-state model in type-II superconductivity. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 55 (2017) 2444–2464. [Google Scholar]
  46. I. Yousept, Optimal control of non-smooth hyperbolic evolution maxwell equations in type-II superconductivity. SIAM J. Control Optim. 55 (2017) 2305–2332. [Google Scholar]
  47. I. Yousept, Hyperbolic Maxwell variational inequalities of the second kind. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 26 (2020) 34. [Google Scholar]
  48. I. Yousept, Well-posedness theory for electromagnetic obstacle problems. J. Differ. Equ. 269 (2020) 8855–8881. [Google Scholar]
  49. I. Yousept, Maxwell quasi-variational inequalities in superconductivity. ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 55 (2021) 1545–1568. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  50. L.B. Zhang, T. Cui and H. Liu, A set of symmetric quadrature rules on triangles and tetrahedra. J. Comput. Math. 27 (2009) 89–96. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you