EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 59 / No 6 (November-December 2025) ESAIM: M2AN, 59 6 (2025) 3249-3281 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 59, Number 6, November-December 2025
Page(s) 3249 - 3281
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2025072
Published online 17 December 2025
  1. G.D. Akrivis, V.A. Dougalis and O.A. Karakashian, On fully discrete Galerkin methods of second-order temporal accuracy for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Numer. Math. 59 (1991) 31–53. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Altmann, P. Henning and D. Peterseim, Numerical homogenization beyond scale separation. Acta Numer. 30 (2021) 1–86. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  3. X. Antoine, W. Bao and C. Besse, Computational methods for the dynamics of the nonlinear Schrödinger/Gross–Pitaevskii equations. Comput. Phys. Comm. 184 (2013) 2621–2633. [Google Scholar]
  4. W. Auzinger, T. Kassebacher, O. Koch and M. Thalhammer, Convergence of a Strang splitting finite element discretization for the Schrödinger–Poisson equation. ESAIM: M2AN 51 (2017) 1245–1278. [Google Scholar]
  5. W. Bao and Y. Cai, Mathematical theory and numerical methods for Bose–Einstein condensation. Kinet. Relat. Models 6 (2013) 1–135. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  6. W. Bao, S. Jin and P.A. Markowich, On time-splitting spectral approximations for the Schrödinger equation in the semiclassical regime. J. Comput. Phys. 175 (2002) 487–524. [Google Scholar]
  7. W. Bao, D. Jaksch and P.A. Markowich, Numerical solution of the Gross–Pitaevskii equation for Bose–Einstein condensation. J. Comput. Phys. 187 (2003) 318–342. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  8. W. Bao, S. Jin and P.A. Markowich, Numerical study of time-splitting spectral discretizations of nonlinear Schrödinger equations in the semiclassical regimes. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 25 (2003) 27–64. [Google Scholar]
  9. C. Besse, A relaxation scheme for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 42 (2004) 934–952. [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Besse, B. Bidégaray and S. Descombes, Order estimates in time of splitting methods for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 40 (2003) 26–40. [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Besse, S. Descombes, G. Dujardin and I. Lacroix-Violet, Energy-preserving methods for nonlinear Schrödinger equations. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 41 (2020) 618–653. [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Chen, D. Ma and Z. Zhang, A multiscale finite element method for the Schrödinger equation with multiscale potentials. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 41 (2019) B1115–B1136. [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Chen, S. Li and Z. Zhang, Efficient multiscale methods for the semiclassical Schrödinger equation with time-dependent potentials. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 369 (2020) 113232. [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Chen, D. Ma and Z. Zhang, A multiscale reduced basis method for the Schrödinger equation with multiscale and random potentials. Multiscale Model. Simul. 18 (2020) 1409–1434. [Google Scholar]
  15. E.T. Chung, Y. Efendiev and G. Li, An adaptive GMsFEM for high-contrast flow problems. J. Comput. Phys. 273 (2014) 54–76. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Descombes, Convergence of a splitting method of high order for reaction–diffusion systems. Math. Comput. 70 (2001) 1481–1501. [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Dick, F.Y. Kuo and I.H. Sloan, High-dimensional integration: the quasi-Monte Carlo way. Acta Numer. 22 (2013) 133–288. [Google Scholar]
  18. C. Döding, P. Henning and J. W¨arnegård, An efficient two level approach for simulating Bose–Einstein condensates. Preprint arXiv:2212.07392 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Donsa, H. Hofst¨atter, O. Koch, J. Burgdörfer and I. Březinová, Long-time expansion of a Bose–Einstein condensate: observability of Anderson localization. Phys. Rev. A 96 (2017) 043630. [Google Scholar]
  20. W. E and B. Engquist, The heterognous multiscale methods. Commun. Math. Sci. 1 (2003) 87–132. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  21. Y. Efendiev, J. Galvis and T.Y. Hou, Generalized multiscale finite element methods (GMsFEM). J. Comput. Phys. 251 (2013) 116–135. [Google Scholar]
  22. Y. Efendiev and T.Y. Hou, Multiscale Finite Element Methods: Theory and Applications. Vol. 4. Springer Science & Business Media (2009). [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Fishman, Y. Krivolapov and A. Soffer, The nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a random potential: results and puzzles. Nonlinearity 25 (2012) R53. [Google Scholar]
  24. I. García-Mata and D.L. Shepelyansky, Delocalization induced by nonlinearity in systems with disorder. Phys. Rev. E 79 (2009) 026205. [Google Scholar]
  25. I.G. Graham, F.Y. Kuo, J.A. Nichols, R. Scheichl, C. Schwab and I.H. Sloan, Quasi-Monte Carlo finite element methods for elliptic PDEs with lognormal random coefficients. Numer. Math. 131 (2015) 329–368. [Google Scholar]
  26. P. Henning and A. Målqvist, Localized orthogonal decomposition techniques for boundary value problems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 36 (2014) A1609–A1634. [Google Scholar]
  27. P. Henning and A. Persson, On optimal convergence rates for discrete minimizers of the Gross–Pitaevskii energy in localized orthogonal decomposition spaces. Multiscale Model. Simul. 21 (2023) 993–1011. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  28. P. Henning and J. W¨arnegård, Numerical comparison of mass-conservative schemes for the Gross–Pitaevskii equation. Kinet. Relat. Models 12 (2019) 1247–1271. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  29. P. Henning and J. W¨arnegård, Superconvergence of time invariants for the Gross–Pitaevskii equation. Math. Comput. 91 (2022) 509–555. [Google Scholar]
  30. P. Henning, A. Målqvist and D. Peterseim, Two-level discretization techniques for ground state computations of Bose–Einstein condensates. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 52 (2014) 1525–1550. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  31. T.Y. Hou and X.-H. Wu, A multiscale finite element method for elliptic problems in composite materials and porous media. J. Comput. Phys. 134 (1997) 169–189. [Google Scholar]
  32. T.Y. Hou and P. Zhang, Sparse operator compression of higher-order elliptic operators with rough coefficients. Res. Math. Sci. 4 (2017) 24. [Google Scholar]
  33. T. Hou, P. Liu and Z. Zhang, A model reduction method for elliptic PDEs with random input using the heterogeneous stochastic FEM framework. Bull. Inst. Math. 11 (2016) 179–216. [Google Scholar]
  34. T.Y. Hou, D. Ma and Z. Zhang, A model reduction method for multiscale elliptic PDEs with random coefficients using an optimization approach. Multiscale Model. Simul. 17 (2019) 826–853. [Google Scholar]
  35. A. Iomin, Subdiffusion in the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with disorder. Phys. Rev. E 81 (2010) 017601. [Google Scholar]
  36. K. Karhunen, Über lineare methoden in der wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae: Ser. A 37 (1947) 1. [Google Scholar]
  37. M. Knöller, A. Ostermann and K. Schratz, A Fourier integrator for the cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation with rough initial data. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 57 (2019) 1967–1986. [Google Scholar]
  38. S. Li and Z. Zhang, Computing eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of Schrödinger equations using a model reduction approach. Commun. Comput. Phys. 24 (2018) 1073–1100. [Google Scholar]
  39. S. Li, Z. Zhang and H. Zhao, A data-driven approach for multiscale elliptic PDEs with random coefficients based on intrinsic dimension reduction. Multiscale Model. Simul. 18 (2020) 1242–1271. [Google Scholar]
  40. M. Loève, Probability Theory II. Vol. 46 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics (1978). [Google Scholar]
  41. J.C. López-Marcos and J.M. Sanz-Serna, A definition of stability for nonlinear problems. Numer. Treatment Differ. Equ. 104 (1988) 216–226. [Google Scholar]
  42. D. Ma and Z. Zhang, A quasi monte carlo-based model reduction method for solving Helmholtz equation in random media. Commun. Anal. Comput. (CAC) 1 (2023). DOI: 10.3934/cac.2023015. [Google Scholar]
  43. A. Målqvist and D. Peterseim, Computation of eigenvalues by numerical upscaling. Numer. Math. 130 (2015) 337–361. [Google Scholar]
  44. A. Målqvist and D. Peterseim, Numerical Homogenization by Localized Orthogonal Decomposition. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA (2020). [Google Scholar]
  45. M. Meister, S. Arnold, D. Moll, M. Eckart, E. Kajari, M.A. Efremov, R. Walser and W.P. Schleich, Chapter six – Efficient description of Bose–Einstein condensates in time-dependent rotating traps, in Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics. Vol. 66. Academic Press (2017) 375–438. [Google Scholar]
  46. A.V. Milovanov and A. Iomin, Destruction of Anderson localization in quantum nonlinear Schrödinger lattices. Phys. Rev. E 95 (2017) 042142. [Google Scholar]
  47. A. Ostermann, Y. Wu and F. Yao, A second-order low-regularity integrator for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Adv. Contin. Discrete Models 2022 (2022) 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  48. H. Owhadi, Multigrid with rough coefficients and multiresolution operator decomposition from hierarchical information games. SIAM Rev. 59 (2017) 99–149. [Google Scholar]
  49. H. Owhadi and L. Zhang, Localized bases for finite-dimensional homogenization approximations with nonseparated scales and high contrast. Multiscale Model. Simul. 9 (2011) 1373–1398. [Google Scholar]
  50. D. Peterseim, Eliminating the pollution effect in Helmholtz problems by local subspace correction. Math. Comput. 86 (2017) 1005–1036. [Google Scholar]
  51. A.S. Pikovsky and D.L. Shepelyansky, Destruction of Anderson localization by a weak nonlinearity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 094101. [Google Scholar]
  52. J.M. Sanz-Serna, Methods for the numerical solution of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Math. Comput. 43 (1984) 21–27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. C. Schwab and R.A. Todor, Karhunen–Loéve approximation of random fields by generalized fast multipole methods. J. Comput. Phys. 217 (2006) 100–122. [Google Scholar]
  54. D.L. Shepelyansky, Delocalization of quantum chaos by weak nonlinearity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 1787–1790. [Google Scholar]
  55. M.E. Taylor, Partial Differential Equations III: Nonlinear Equations. Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer New York (2010). [Google Scholar]
  56. M. Thalhammer, High-order exponential operator splitting methods for time-dependent Schrödinger equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 46 (2008) 2022–2038. [Google Scholar]
  57. J. Wang, A new error analysis of Crank-Nicolson Galerkin FEMs for a generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation. J. Sci. Comput. 60 (2014) 390–407. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  58. Z. Wang, X. Luo, S. Yau and Z. Zhang, Proper orthogonal decomposition method to nonlinear filtering problems in medium-high dimension. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 65 (2019) 1613–1624. [Google Scholar]
  59. Z. Wu and Z. Zhang, Convergence analysis of the localized orthogonal decomposition method for the semiclassical Schrödinger equations with multiscale potentials. J. Sci. Comput. 93 (2022) 73. [Google Scholar]
  60. Z. Wu, Z. Zhang and X. Zhao, Error estimate of a quasi-Monte Carlo time-splitting pseudospectral method for nonlinear Schrödinger equation with random potentials. SIAM/ASA J. Uncertainty Quantif. 12 (2024) 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  61. X. Zhao, Numerical integrators for continuous disordered nonlinear Schrödinger equation. J. Sci. Comput. 89 (2021) 40. [Google Scholar]
  62. G.E. Zouraris, On the convergence of a linear two-step finite element method for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation. ESAIM: M2AN 35 (2001) 389–405. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you