EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Sciengine logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 60 / No 1 (January-February 2026) ESAIM: M2AN, 60 1 (2026) 411-444 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 60, Number 1, January-February 2026
Page(s) 411 - 444
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2026005
Published online 11 March 2026
  1. V. Anaya, D. Mora, R. Oyarzúa and R. Ruiz-Baier, A priori and a posteriori error analysis of a mixed scheme for the Brinkman problem. Numer. Math. 133 (2016) 781–817. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  2. V. Anaya, D. Mora and R. Ruiz-Baier, Pure vorticity formulation and Galerkin discretization for the Brinkman equations. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 37 (2017) 2020–2041. [Google Scholar]
  3. P.F. Antonietti, L. Beirão da Veiga, D. Mora and M. Verani, A stream virtual element formulation of the Stokes problem on polygonal meshes. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 52 (2014) 386–404. [Google Scholar]
  4. P.F. Antonietti, C. Facciolà, P. Houston, I. Mazzieri, G. Pennesi and M. Verani, High-order discontinuous Galerkin methods on polyhedral grids for geophysical applications: seismic wave propagation and fractured reservoir simulations, in Polyhedral Methods in Geosciences. Vol. 27 of SEMA SIMAI Springer Series. Springer, Cham (2021) 159–225. [Google Scholar]
  5. P.F. Antonietti, L. Beirão da Veiga and G. Manzini, The Virtual Element Method and its Applications. Vol. 31. Springer (2022). [Google Scholar]
  6. H.J. Barbosa and T.J. Hughes, The finite element method with Lagrange multipliers on the boundary: circumventing the Babuška Brezzi condition. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 85 (1991) 109–128. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. L. Beirão da Veiga, F. Brezzi, A. Cangiani, G. Manzini, L.D. Marini and A. Russo, Basic principles of virtual element methods. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 23 (2013) 199–214. [Google Scholar]
  8. L. Beirão da Veiga, K. Lipnikov and G. Manzini, The Mimetic Finite Difference Method for Elliptic Problems. Vol. 11 of MSCA. Modeling, Simulation and Applications. Springer, Cham (2014). [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Beirão da Veiga, C. Lovadina and G. Vacca, Divergence free virtual elements for the Stokes problem on polygonal meshes. ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 51 (2017) 509–535. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  10. L. Beirão da Veiga, C. Lovadina and G. Vacca, Virtual elements for the Navier-Stokes problem on polygonal meshes. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 56 (2018) 1210–1242. [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Beirão da Veiga, D. Mora and G. Vacca, The Stokes complex for virtual elements with application to Navier- Stokes flows. J. Sci. Comput. 81 (2019) 990–1018. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Beirão da Veiga, F. Brezzi, L.D. Marini and A. Russo, The virtual element method. Acta Numer. 32 (2023) 123–202. [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Beirão da Veiga, C. Lovadina and M. Trezzi, CIP-stabilized virtual elements for diffusion-convection-reaction problems. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 45 (2024) 934–970. [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Bertoluzza, M. Pennacchio and D. Prada, Weakly imposed Dirichlet boundary conditions for 2D and 3D Virtual Elements. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 400 (2022) 115454. [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Boffi, F. Brezzi and M. Fortin, Mixed Finite Element Methods and Applications. Vol. 44. Springer (2013). [Google Scholar]
  16. L. Botti, D.A. Di Pietro and J. Droniou, A Hybrid High-Order discretisation of the Brinkman problem robust in the Darcy and Stokes limits. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 341 (2018) 278–310. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S.C. Brenner and L.R. Scott, The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods. Springer (2008). [Google Scholar]
  18. E. Burman, P. Hansbo and M. Larson, Cut finite element method for divergence-free approximation of incompressible flow: a lagrange multiplier approach. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 62 (2024) 893–918. [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Cáceres and G.N. Gatica, A mixed virtual element method for the pseudostress-velocity formulation of the Stokes problem. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 37 (2017) 296–331. [Google Scholar]
  20. E. Cáceres, G.N. Gatica and F.A. Sequeira, A mixed virtual element method for the Brinkman problem. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 27 (2017) 707–743. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Cangiani, E.H. Georgoulis and P. Houston, hp-version discontinuous Galerkin methods on polygonal and polyhedral meshes. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 24 (2014) 2009–2041. [Google Scholar]
  22. N. Carro, D. Mora and J. Vellojin, A finite element model for concentration polarization and osmotic effects in a membrane channel. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 96 (2024) 601–625. [Google Scholar]
  23. F. Chouly and P. Hild, A Nitsche-based method for unilateral contact problems: numerical analysis. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 51 (2013) 1295–1307. [Google Scholar]
  24. F. Chouly, R. Mlika and Y. Renard, An unbiased Nitsche’s approximation of the frictional contact between two elastic structures. Numer. Math. 139 (2018) 593–631. [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Dedner and A. Hodson, A framework for implementing general virtual element spaces. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 46 (2024) B229–B253. [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Dedner, R. Klöfkorn, M. Nolte and M. Ohlberger, A generic interface for parallel and adaptive discretization schemes: abstraction principles and the DUNE-FEM module. Computing 90 (2010) 165–196. [Google Scholar]
  27. D.A. Di Pietro and J. Droniou, The Hybrid High-Order Method for Polytopal Meshes. Vol. 19 of MS&A. Modeling, Simulation and Applications: Design, Analysis and Applications. Springer, Cham (2020). [Google Scholar]
  28. D.A. Di Pietro and J. Droniou, A polytopal method for the Brinkman problem robust in all regimes. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 409 (2023) 115981. [Google Scholar]
  29. D.A. Di Pietro and A. Ern, A hybrid high-order locking-free method for linear elasticity on general meshes. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 283 (2015) 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  30. L.F. Gatica and F.A. Sequeira, A priori and a posteriori error analyses of an HDG method for the Brinkman problem. Comput. Math. Appl. 75 (2018) 1191–1212. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  31. G.N. Gatica and F.A. Sequeira, An L spaces-based mixed virtual element method for the two-dimensional Navier- Stokes equations. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 31 (2021) 2937–2977. [Google Scholar]
  32. G.N. Gatica, M. Munar and F.A. Sequeira, A mixed virtual element method for a nonlinear Brinkman model of porous media flow. Calcolo 55 (2018) 21. [Google Scholar]
  33. C. Geuzaine and J.-F. Remacle, Gmsh: a 3-D finite element mesh generator with built-in pre-and post-processing facilities. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 79 (2009) 1309–1331. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. I. Gjerde and L. Scott, Nitsche’s method for Navier-Stokes equations with slip boundary conditions. Math. Comput. 91 (2022) 597–622. [Google Scholar]
  35. P. Hansbo, Nitsche’s method for interface problems in computational mechanics. GAMM-Mitteilungen 28 (2005) 183–206. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  36. X. Huang and F. Wang, Analysis of divergence free conforming virtual elements for the Brinkman problem. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 33 (2023) 1245–1280. [Google Scholar]
  37. M. Juntunen and R. Stenberg, Nitsche’s method for general boundary conditions. Math. Comput. 78 (2009) 1353–1374. [Google Scholar]
  38. L. Mascotto, Ill-conditioning in the virtual element method: stabilizations and bases. Numer. Methods Part. Differ. Equ. 34 (2018) 1258–1281. [Google Scholar]
  39. S. Meddahi and R. Ruiz-Baier, A new DG method for a pure-stress formulation of the Brinkman problem with strong symmetry. Netw. Heterog. Media 17 (2022) 893–916. [Google Scholar]
  40. D. Mora, C. Reales and A. Silgado, A C1-virtual element method of high order for the Brinkman equations in stream function formulation with pressure recovery. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 42 (2022) 3632–3674. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  41. J. Nitsche, Über ein variationsprinzip zur lösung von dirichlet-problemen bei verwendung von teilräumen, die keinen randbedingungen unterworfen sind, in Abhandlungen aus dem mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg. Vol. 36. Springer (1971) 9–15. [Google Scholar]
  42. N. Schlömer, pygmsh: a Python frontend for Gmsh. Zenodo (2021). [Google Scholar]
  43. C. Talischi, G.H. Paulino, A. Pereira and I.F. Menezes, Polymesher: a general-purpose mesh generator for polygonal elements written in Matlab. Struct. Multidisciplinary Optim. 45 (2012) 309–328. [Google Scholar]
  44. J.M. Urquiza, A. Garon and M.-I. Farinas, Weak imposition of the slip boundary condition on curved boundaries for stokes flow. J. Comput. Phys. 256 (2014) 748–767. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  45. G. Vacca, An H1-conforming virtual element for Darcy and Brinkman equations. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 28 (2018) 159–194. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  46. P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T.E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, S.J. van der Walt, M. Brett, J. Wilson, K.J. Millman, N. Mayorov, A.R.J. Nelson, E. Jones, R. Kern, E. Larson, C.J. Carey, İ. Polat, Y. Feng, E.W. Moore, J. VanderPlas, D. Laxalde, J. Perktold, R. Cimrman, I. Henriksen, E.A. Quintero, C.R. Harris, A.M. Archibald, A.H. Ribeiro, F. Pedregosa, P. van Mulbregt and SciPy 1.0 Contributors, SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in python. Nat. Methods 17 (2020) 261–272. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. P. Wriggers, M. De Bellis and B. Hudobivnik, A Taylor-Hood type virtual element formulations for large incompressible strains. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 385 (2021) 114021. [Google Scholar]
  48. L. Zhao, E. Chung and M.F. Lam, A new staggered DG method for the Brinkman problem robust in the Darcy and Stokes limits. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 364 (2020) 112986. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you