Open Access
Issue |
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 57, Number 4, July-August 2023
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 2193 - 2225 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2023036 | |
Published online | 03 July 2023 |
- M. Amrein and T.P. Wihler, Fully adaptive Newton-Galerkin methods for semilinear elliptic partial differential equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 37 (2015) A1637–A1657. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Amrein, P. Heid and T.P. Wihler, A numerical energy minimisation approach for semilinear diffusion-reaction boundary value problems based on steady state iterations. Preprint arXiv:2202.07398 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- M. Arioli, E.H. Georgoulis and D. Loghin, Stopping criteria for adaptive finite element solvers. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 35 (2013) A1537–A1559. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Arioli, J. Liesen, A. Miçdlar and Z. Strakoš, Interplay between discretization and algebraic computation in adaptive numerical solution of elliptic PDE problems. GAMM-Mitt. 36 (2013) 102–129. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- M. Aurada, M. Feischl, T. Führer, M. Karkulik and D. Praetorius, Efficiency and optimality of some weighted-residual error estimator for adaptive 2D boundary element methods. Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 13 (2013) 305–332. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- R.E. Bank, M. Holst, R. Szypowski and Y. Zhu, Finite element error estimates for critical growth semilinear problems without angle conditions. Preprint arXiv:1108.3661 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- I. Babuška and M. Vogelius, Feedback and adaptive finite element solution of one-dimensional boundary value problems. Numer. Math. 44 (1984) 75–102. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- R. Becker, S. Mao and Z. Shi, A convergent nonconforming adaptive finite element method with quasi-optimal complexity. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47 (2010) 4639–4659. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- R. Becker, M. Brunner, M. Innerberger, J.M. Melenk and D. Praetorius, Rate-optimal goal-oriented adaptive FEM for semilinear elliptic PDEs. Comput. Math. Appl. 118 (2022) 18–35. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- L. Belenki, L. Diening and C. Kreuzer, Optimality of an adaptive finite element method for the p-Laplacian equation. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 32 (2012) 484–510. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- A. Bespalov, A. Haberl and D. Praetorius, Adaptive FEM with coarse initial mesh guarantees optimal convergence rates for compactly perturbed elliptic problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 317 (2017) 318–340. [Google Scholar]
- P. Binev, W. Dahmen and R. DeVore, Adaptive finite element methods with convergence rates. Numer. Math. 97 (2004) 219–268. [Google Scholar]
- C. Carstensen, M. Feischl, M. Page and D. Praetorius, Axioms of adaptivity. Comput. Math. Appl. 67 (2014) 1195–1253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- J.M. Cascón and R.H. Nochetto, Quasioptimal cardinality of AFEM driven by nonresidual estimators. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 32 (2012) 1–29. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- J.M. Cascon, C. Kreuzer, R.H. Nochetto and K.G. Siebert, Quasi-optimal convergence rate for an adaptive finite element method. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 46 (2008) 2524–2550. [Google Scholar]
- S. Congreve and T.P. Wihler, Iterative Galerkin discretizations for strongly monotone problems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 311 (2017) 457–472. [Google Scholar]
- L. Diening and C. Kreuzer, Linear convergence of an adaptive finite element method for the p-Laplacian equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 46 (2008) 614–638. [Google Scholar]
- W. Dörfler, A convergent adaptive algorithm for Poisson’s equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 33 (1996) 1106–1124. [Google Scholar]
- L. El Alaoui, A. Ern and M. Vohralk, Guaranteed and robust a posteriori error estimates and balancing discretization and linearization errors for monotone nonlinear problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 200 (2011) 2782–2795. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Ern and M. Vohralk, Adaptive inexact Newton methods with a posteriori stopping criteria for nonlinear diffusion PDEs. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 35 (2013) A1761–A1791. [Google Scholar]
- M. Feischl, T. Führer and D. Praetorius, Adaptive FEM with optimal convergence rates for a certain class of nonsymmetric and possibly nonlinear problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 52 (2014) 601–625. [Google Scholar]
- S. Fučk and A. Kufner, Nonlinear differential equations, in Studies in Applied Mechanics. Vol. 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1980). [Google Scholar]
- G. Gantner, A. Haberl, D. Praetorius and B. Stiftner, Rate optimal adaptive FEM with inexact solver for nonlinear operators. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 38 (2018) 1797–1831. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- G. Gantner, A. Haberl, D. Praetorius and S. Schimanko, Rate optimality of adaptive finite element methods with respect to overall computational costs. Math. Comput. 90 (2021) 2011–2040. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- E.M. Garau, P. Morin and C. Zuppa, Convergence of an adaptive Kačanov FEM for quasi-linear problems. Appl. Numer. Math. 61 (2011) 512–529. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- E.M. Garau, P. Morin and C. Zuppa, Quasi-optimal convergence rate of an AFEM for quasi-linear problems of monotone type. Numer. Math. Theory Methods Appl. 5 (2012) 131–156. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- A. Haberl, D. Praetorius, S. Schimanko and M. Vohralk, Convergence and quasi-optimal cost of adaptive algorithms for nonlinear operators including iterative linearization and algebraic solver. Numer. Math. 147 (2021) 679–725. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- P. Heid and T.P. Wihler, Adaptive iterative linearization Galerkin methods for nonlinear problems. Math. Comput. 89 (2020) 2707–2734. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. Heid and T.P. Wihler, On the convergence of adaptive iterative linearized Galerkin methods. Calcolo 57 (2020) 24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. Heid, D. Praetorius and T.P. Wihler, Energy contraction and optimal convergence of adaptive iterative linearized finite element methods. Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 21 (2021) 407–422. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- P. Houston and T.P. Wihler, An hp-adaptive Newton-discontinuous-Galerkin finite element approach for semilinear elliptic boundary value problems. Math. Comput. 87 (2018) 2641–2674. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Innerberger and D. Praetorius, MooAFEM: an object oriented Matlab code for higher-order adaptive FEM for (nonlinear) elliptic PDEs. Appl. Math. Comput. 442 (2023) 127731. [Google Scholar]
- C. Kreuzer and K.G. Siebert, Decay rates of adaptive finite elements with Dörfler marking. Numer. Math. 117 (2011) 679–716. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- M.S. Mommer and R. Stevenson, A goal-oriented adaptive finite element method with convergence rates. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47 (2009) 861–886. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- P. Morin, R.H. Nochetto and K.G. Siebert, Data oscillation and convergence of adaptive FEM. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 38 (2000) 466–488. [Google Scholar]
- P. Morin, K.G. Siebert and A. Veeser, A basic convergence result for conforming adaptive finite elements. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 18 (2008) 707–737. [Google Scholar]
- C.-M. Pfeiler and D. Praetorius, Dörfler marking with minimal cardinality is a linear complexity problem. Math. Comput. 89 (2020) 2735–2752. [Google Scholar]
- R. Stevenson, Optimality of a standard adaptive finite element method. Found. Comput. Math. 7 (2007) 245–269. [Google Scholar]
- R. Stevenson, The completion of locally refined simplicial partitions created by bisection. Math. Comput. 77 (2008) 227–241. [Google Scholar]
- A. Veeser, Convergent adaptive finite elements for the nonlinear Laplacian. Numer. Math. 92 (2002) 743–770. [Google Scholar]
- R. Verfürth, A Posteriori Error Estimation Techniques for Finite Element Methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. Yosida, Functional analysis, in Classics in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin (1995). Reprint of the sixth (1980) edition. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- E. Zeidler, Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Its Applications. Part II/B. Springer-Verlag, New York (1990). [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.