EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 58 / No 4 (July-August 2024) ESAIM: M2AN, 58 4 (2024) 1347-1383 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: M2AN
Volume 58, Number 4, July-August 2024
Page(s) 1347 - 1383
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2024037
Published online 30 July 2024
  1. R. Adam, Sobolev Spaces. Academic Press, New York (1975). [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Allali, A priori and a posteriori error estimates for Boussinesq equations. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Model. 2 (2005) 179–196. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Ainsworth and J.T. Oden, A posteriori error estimation in finite element analysis, in Pure and Applied Mathematics. Wiley-Insterscience, New York (2000). [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Araya, E. Behrens and R. Rodríguez, A posteriori error estimates for elliptic problems with Dirac Delta source terms. Numer. Math. 105 (2006) 193–216. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Allendes, G.R. Barrenechea and C. Naranjo, A divergence-free low-order stabilized finite element method for a generalized steady state Boussinesq problem. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 340 (2018) 90–120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Allendes, C. Naranjo and E. Otárola, Stabilized finite element approximations for a generalized Boussinesq problem: a posteriori error analysis. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 361 (2020) 112703. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Allendes, E. Otárola and A.J. Salgado, The stationary Boussinesq problem under singular forcing. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 31 (2021) 789–827. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Allendes, F. Fuica and E. Otárola, Error estimates for a pointwise tracking optimal control problem of a semilinear elliptic equation. SIAM J. Control Optim. 60 (2022) 1763–1790. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Allendes, G. Campaña and E. Otárola, Numerical discretization of a Darcy-Forchheimer problem coupled with a singular heat equation. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 45 (2023) A2755–A2780. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Allendes, G. Campaña, F. Fuica and E. Otárola, Darcy’s problem coupled with the heat equation under singular forcing: analysis and discretization. IMA J. Numer. Anal. (2024) drad094. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. J.A. Almonacid and G.N. Gatica, A fully-mixed finite element method for the n-dimensional Boussinesq problem with temperature-dependent parameters. Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 20 (2020) 187–213. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  12. J.A. Almonacid, G.N. Gatica and R. Oyarzúa, A mixed-primal finite element method for the Boussinesq problem with temperature-dependent viscosity. Calcolo 55 (2018) 36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. J.A. Almonacid, G.N. Gatica and R. Oyarzúa, A posteriori error analysis of a mixed-primal finite element method for the Boussinesq problem with temperature-dependent viscosity. J. Sci. Comput. 78 (2019) 887–917. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Alonso Rodríguez, J. Camaño, R. Rodríguez and A. Valli, A posteriori error estimates for the problem of electrostatics with a dipole source. Comput. Math. Appl. 68 (2014) 464–485. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Bernardi, B. Métivet and B. Pernaud-Thomas, Couplage des équations de Navier–Stokes et de la chaleur: le modèle et son approximation par éléments finis. RAIRO Modél. Math. Anal. Numér. 29 (1995) 871–921. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Boland and W. Layton, An analysis of the finite element method for natural convection problems. Numer. Methods Part. Differ. Equ. 6 (1990) 115–126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S.C. Brenner and L.R. Scott, The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods. Springer-Verlag, New York (2008). [Google Scholar]
  18. E. Casas, Control of an elliptic problem with pointwise state constaints. SIAM J. Control Optim. 24 (1986) 1309–1318. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Cesmelioglu, B. Cockburn and W. Qiu, Analysis of a hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin method for the steady-state incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Math. Comput. 86 (2017) 1643–1670. [Google Scholar]
  20. B. Cockburn, J. Gopalakrishnan and R. Lazarov, Unified hybridization of discontinuous Galerkin, mixed, and continuous Galerkin methods for second order elliptic problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47 (2009) 1319–1365. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  21. D.A. Di Pietro and A. Ern, Discrete functional analysis tools for discontinuous Galerkin methods with application to the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Math. Comput. 79 (2010) 1303–1330. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. D.A. Di Pietro and A. Ern, Mathematical Aspects of Discontinuous Galerkin Methods. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Ern and J.-L. Guermond, Theory and Practice of Finite Elements. Springer-Verlag, New York (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Farhloul, S. Nicaise and L. Paquet, A mixed formulation of Boussinesq equations: analysis of nonsingular solutions. Math. Comput. 69 (2000) 965–986. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. G. Fu, W. Qiu and W. Zhang, An analysis of HDG methods for convection-dominated diffusion problems. ESAIM: M2AN 49 (2015) 225–256. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  26. F. Fuica, F. Lepe, E. Otárola and D. Quero, An optimal control problem for the Navier–Stokes equations with point sources. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 196 (2023) 590–616. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  27. G. Fulford and J. Blake, Muco-ciliary transport in the lung. J. Theor. Biol. 121 (1986) 381–402. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. V. Girault and P.-A. Raviart, Finite Element Methods for Navier–Stokes Equations, Theory and Algorithms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg (1986). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. J. Guzmán, Pointwise error estimates for discontinuous Galerkin methods with lifting operators for elliptic problems. Math. Comput. 75 (2006) 1067–1085. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. P. Hansbo and M.G. Larson, Discontinuous Galerkin methods for incompressible and nearly incompressible elasticity by Nitsche’s method. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 191 (2002) 1895–1908. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. P. Houston and T.P. Wihler, Discontinuous Galerkin methods for problem with Dirac delta source. ESAIM: M2AN 46 (2012) 1467–1483. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  32. D. Jerison and C.E. Kenig, The inhomogeneous Dirichlet problem in Lipschitz domain. J. Funct. Anal. 130 (1995) 161–219. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  33. O.A. Karakashian and W.N. Jureidini, A nonconforming finite element method for the stationary Navier–Stokes equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 35 (1998) 93–120. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  34. O.A. Karakashian and F. Pascal, A posteriori error estimates for a discontinuous Galerkin approximation of second-order elliptic problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 41 (2003) 2374–2399. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  35. K.L.A. Kirk and S. Rhebergen, Analysis of a pressure-robust hybridized discontinuous Galerkin method for the stationary Navier–Stokes equations. J. Sci. Comput. 81 (2019) 881–897. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  36. H. Leng, Analysis of an HDG method for the Navier–Stokes equations with Dirac measures. ESAIM: M2AN 57 (2023) 271–297. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  37. S.A. Lorca and J.L. Boldrini, Stationary solutions for generalized Boussinesq models. J. Differ. Equ. 124 (1996) 389–406. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. M.T. Manzari, An explicit finite element algorithm for convection heat transfer problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow 9 (1999) 860–877. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. N. Nguyen, J. Peraire and B. Cockburn, An implict high-order hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin method for linear convection diffusion equations. J. Comput. Phys. 228 (2009) 3232–3254. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  40. N. Nguyen, J. Peraire and B. Cockburn, An implict high-order hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin method for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. J Comput. Phys. 230 (2011) 1147–1170. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  41. E. Otárola, Semilinear optimal control with Dirac measures. IMA J. Numer. Anal. (2023) drad091. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. R. Oyarzúa and M. Serón, A divergence-conforming DG-mixed finite element method for the stationary Boussinesq problem. J. Sci. Comput. 85 (2020) 14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. R. Oyarzúa and P. Zúñiga, Analysis of a conforming finite element method for the Boussinesq problem with temperature-denpendent parameters. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 323 (2017) 71–94. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  44. R. Oyarzúa, T. Qin and D. Schötzau, An exactly divergence-free finite element method for a generalized Boussinesq problem. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 34 (2014) 1104–1135. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  45. C.E. Pérez, J.-M. Thomas, S. Blancher and R. Creff, The steady Navier–Stokes/energy system with temperature-dependent viscosity. I. Analysis of the continuous problem. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 56 (2008) 63–89. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. C.E. Pérez, J.-M. Thomas, S. Blancher and R. Creff, The steady Navier–Stokes/energy system with temperature-dependent viscosity. II. The discrete problem and numerical experiments. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 56 (2008) 91–114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. S. Rhebergen and G.N. Wells, A hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin method for the Navier–Stokes equations with pointwise divergence-free velocity field. J. Sci. Comput. 76 (2018) 1484–1501. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  48. S. Rhebergen and G.N. Wells, Analysis of a hybridized/interface stabilized finite element method for the Stokes equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 55 (2017) 1982–2003. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  49. S. Rhebergen and G.N. Wells, Preconditioning of a hybridized discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for the Stokes equations. J. Sci. Comput. 77 (2018) 1936–1952. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  50. Z. Shen, Bounds of Riesz transforms on Lp spaces for second order elliptic operators. Ann. Inst. Fourier 55 (2005) 173–197. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  51. M.P. Ueckermann and P.F.J. Lermusiaux, Hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin projection methods for Navier–Stokes and Boussinesq equations. J. Comput. Phys. 306 (2016) 390–421. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  52. R. Verfürth, A posteriori error estimators for convection-diffusion equations. Numer. Math. 80 (1998) 641–663. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  53. R. Verfürth, A Posteriori Error Estimation Techniques for Finite Element Methods, Numerical Mathematics on Scientific Computation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. G.N. Wells, Analysis of an interface stabilized finite element method: the advection-diffusion-reaction equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 49 (2011) 87–109. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Recommended for you